Difference between revisions of "Team:Czech Republic/Interlab study"
(→Background) |
(→Background) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
= Background = | = Background = | ||
“All iGEM teams are invited and encouraged to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology.” | “All iGEM teams are invited and encouraged to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology.” | ||
+ | |||
Our team accept this remarkable challenge that should show differences in cloning and measurement between teams all over the world. The main task was to characterize expression profiles of three promoters with different strength. In our case, we measured fluorescence using flow cytometer. | Our team accept this remarkable challenge that should show differences in cloning and measurement between teams all over the world. The main task was to characterize expression profiles of three promoters with different strength. In our case, we measured fluorescence using flow cytometer. | ||
Revision as of 10:57, 4 September 2015
{{{1}}}
Contents
Background
“All iGEM teams are invited and encouraged to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology.”
Our team accept this remarkable challenge that should show differences in cloning and measurement between teams all over the world. The main task was to characterize expression profiles of three promoters with different strength. In our case, we measured fluorescence using flow cytometer.
Design
Cloning of GFP gen into the vector containing promoter allows us to measure strength of promoter via fluorescence. For construction of such device we chose to use BioBrick Standard Assembly. Suffix promoters was cut with the enzymes SpeI and PstI. Prefix of GFP gen was cut with the XbaI enzyme and suffix with the PtI enzyme. Enzymes SpeI and XbaI have compatible sticky ends. This allows us to connect two parts of final device together through ligation.
Materials and methods
Used plasmids
- Device 1 (20K+21J): J23101 + I13504, in the pSB1C3 backbone
- Device 2 (22A+21J): J23106 + I13504, in the pSB1C3 backbone
- Device 3 (22K+21J): J23117 + I13504, in the pSB1C3 backbone
- Positive control (C+): I20270, in the pSB1C3 backbone
- Negative control (C-): K823008, in the pSB1C3 backbone
Used strain
E. coli E5alpha
Used material
- LB-M agar plates with chloramphenicol
- LB-M agar plates with ampicillin
- 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes
- 0.5 ml PCR tubes
- 50 ml centrifuge conical base and rim tubes
- NucleoSpin Plasmid DNA, RNA, and protein purification Kit
- NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit
- LB-M medium with chloramphenicol
- NaOH agarose gel and buffer
- Sphero Rainbow Calibration Particles, 8 Peaks, 3.0-3.4
Used methods
- Transformation
- Miniprep
- Restriction digest
- Ligation
- NucleoSpin Gel Clean-up
- NucleoSpin Plasmid DNA purification
- Flow cytometry
All used protocols can be found here: Protocols
Used machines
- Incubator: Binder, ATP.line CB(E6), CO2 – Incubator with O2 control, model CB160, 230V
- Orbita Shaker PSU-10i, 280 rpm, 360deg
- Flow Cytometr C6
- Thermo-Shaker with cooling for microtubes and PCR plates TS-100C
- Centrifuge 5424/5424 R
Used software
- CFlow Plus
- Microsoft Excel
- Sphero PMT QC Template
Description
Plasmids containing promoters and GFP were taken from The 2015 DNA Distribution Kit and transformed into E. coli. Colonies were streaked for patches and amplified plasmids were obtained using NucleoSpin Plasmid DNA purification. Restriction digest followed using XbaI and PstI enzymes for digest of plasmid with GFP and SpeI and PstI ezymes for digest of plasmids containing promoters. Desired parts were then cut out of gel and purified using NucleoSpin Gel Clean-up. Ligation of Device 1 and 2 followed our standard protocol. However ligation of Device 3 had to be repeated several times and the protocol had to be modified (2 hours ligation, 5:1 insert:vector ratio). All devices were transformed into E.coli. Fluorescence of colonies was checked up under UV light. Plasmids were then obtained by NucleoSpin Plasmid DNA purification. Devices were verified on gel after restriction digest using SpeI and EcoRI enzymes and by sequencing.
Picture o patches (all together)
Picture of colonies????
All verified devices were again transformed into E. coli accompanied by positive and negative control. 5 ml of liquid LB-M medium with chloramphenicol were inoculated with three chosen colonies of each device. There were no biological replicates for positive and negative control. Liquid cultures were incubated for 17 hours in Orbita Shaker PSU-10i placed in incubator. OD of these cultures was measured and diluted to 0,1. Fluorescence of biological and also technical replicates was measured using Flow Cytometr C6 following our flow cytometry protocol.
Processing of data
Raw data obtained from Flow Cytometr C6 were transformed into MEFL (Molecules of Equivalent Fluorescein) unites. We used Sphero Rainbow Calibration Particles, 8 Peaks, 3.0-3.4 to obtain a Calibration Graph using Sphero PMT QC Template. MEFL data were then processed in Microsoft Excel.
Protocol [Spherotech]
- Run the 3.0 μm RCPs, which the MEFL are known. Adjust the signal settings such as laser power ….. to place all peaks within the 4-decade log scale. Record the fluorescence Mean Channel Number for each peak.
- Plot the assigned MEFL value for each peak vs the Mean Channel Number on the SPHERO PMT QC Teplate to obtain a Calibration Graph. (see appendix)
- Run the unknown sample using the same instrument settings (see Flow Cytometr protocol). Record the Mean Channel Number of sample.
- Calculate the MEFL of the unknown by crosscalibrating its Mean Channel Number against the Calibration Graph of the RCPs.
Calibration Graph + PeakChMEFL
Results
Device | Colony | MEFL | Mean of technical replicates | SD Colony | Mean of device | SD Device | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20K +21J (Device 1) | Colony 1 | I. | 639549 | 657818 | 15504 | 664409 | 29185 |
II. | 677453 | ||||||
III. | 656453 | ||||||
Colony 2 | I. | 689717 | 702990 | 10067 | |||
II. | 714084 | ||||||
III. | 705169 | ||||||
Colony 3 | I. | 620331 | 632419 | 15053 | |||
II. | 623286 | ||||||
III. | 653639 | ||||||
22A+21J (Device 2) | Colony 1 | I. | 481600 | 464304 | 12795 | 392603 | 50712 |
II. | 460265 | ||||||
III. | 451048 | ||||||
Colony 2 | I. | 346283 | 358070 | 9696 | |||
II. | 357896 | ||||||
III. | 370032 | ||||||
Colony 3 | I. | 354544 | 355433 | 4688 | |||
II. | 350188 | ||||||
III. | 361568 | ||||||
22K+21J (Device 3) | Colony 1 | I. | 2635 | 2872 | 220 | 2229 | 454 |
II. | 3165 | ||||||
III. | 2814 | ||||||
Colony 2 | I. | 1786 | 1891 | 74 | |||
II. | 1933 | ||||||
III. | 1953 | ||||||
Colony 3 | I. | 1665 | 1926 | 204 | |||
II. | 1948 | ||||||
III. | 2163 | ||||||
Positive control | Colony 1 | I. | 202361 | 196401 | 5853 | 196401 | / |
II. | 188446 | ||||||
III. | 198395 | ||||||
Negative control | Colony 1 | I. | 224 | 213 | 8 | 213 | / |
II. | 204 | ||||||
III. | 211 |
graphs
It is noticeable that promoter of Device 1 is strongest followed by promoter of Device 3. Device 1 has the weakest promoter.
Picture of gel (all together)
Sequencing results
Reference
- ↑ Spherotech, Inc. SHERO Technical Note, Measuring molecules of equivalent fluorochrome (MEF) using Sphero Rainbow and Ultrarainbow Calibration Particles[Online] [Cited: 9 4, 2015.] http://www.spherotech.com/Updated%20STN%208-21-07/STN-9%20Rev%20D.pdf
Appendix
Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study
Anna Sosnová – leading, construction of devices, measurement, processing of data, wiki content
Václav Pelíšek – assisntace, transformation from kit
Bc. Hynek Kasl – assistance
Jan Bejvl – processing of data
Ing. Pavel Zach – biobrick assembly advisor
Mgr. Kateřina Pěchotová – technical advisor
M.Sc. Daniel Georgiev, PhD – support, possibility to perform this study
External links
Raw data
Calibration graph
Flow cytometer graph example ????