Difference between revisions of "Team:Birkbeck/Results"
Srcraig1987 (Talk | contribs) |
Srcraig1987 (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<p><b><u>Fig. 1: Growth Curve of <i>E. coli</i> DH5α Strains Following Culture Optical Density of 600 nm</u></b>.</p> | <p><b><u>Fig. 1: Growth Curve of <i>E. coli</i> DH5α Strains Following Culture Optical Density of 600 nm</u></b>.</p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | <p>Growth kinetics was initially studied using 50 mL cultures. <b>Fig. 1</b> shows the growth kinetics of <i>E. coli</i> DH5α & derivative strains containing plasmids from the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Birkbeck/InterLab_Study">InterLab</a> study. The growth curve shows that the <i>E. coli</i> strain that contains the P1-<i>gfp</i> expression device grows at a slower rate than the other strains investigated. At 220 minutes the <i>E. coli</i> DH5α P1 strain has a significantly lower OD<sub>600</sub> than the <i>E. coli</i> DH5α (P=0.023). <i>E. coli</i> DH5α remains very highly significantly higher in OD600 than <i>E. coli</i> DH5α with the P1-<i>gfp</i> expression device (P=<0.001)<!---->. The only difference between the <i>E. coli</i> DH5α & <i>E. coli</i> DH5α positive control device is observed at 280 minutes into the growth curve (P=0.016) where the positive control has a higher OD<sub>600</sub>. The multiple comparison table showing P values can be viewed in <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Birkbeck/Results/Table_S1"><b>Table S1</b></a></p>. | |
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a8/Growth_Curve_%28395_nm%29_50_mL_Cultures_Team_birkbeck_iGEM_2015.jpg "></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a8/Growth_Curve_%28395_nm%29_50_mL_Cultures_Team_birkbeck_iGEM_2015.jpg "></center> | ||
<p><b><u>Fig. 2: Growth Curve of <i>E. coli</i> DH5α Strains Following Culture Optical Density of 395 nm</u></b>.</p> | <p><b><u>Fig. 2: Growth Curve of <i>E. coli</i> DH5α Strains Following Culture Optical Density of 395 nm</u></b>.</p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | <p>In order to investigate if there could be a point in the <i>E. coli</i> DH5α growth curve in which a signal from the GFP could be detected by absorbance, the growth curves were also conducted using the major absorption peak of GFP (wavelength 395 nm) <!--(REF!)-->. The growth curve data for the culture optical density is displayed in <b>Fig. 2</b>.</P> | |
− | + | <br> | |
+ | <p></p> | ||
<!--Multiple Comparison table link for OD 395 nm (table S2); https://2015.igem.org/Team:Birkbeck/Results/Table_S2. issue sorted, this page is good to go!.--> | <!--Multiple Comparison table link for OD 395 nm (table S2); https://2015.igem.org/Team:Birkbeck/Results/Table_S2. issue sorted, this page is good to go!.--> | ||
<!--For sorting out code to make it look decent on our wiki; https://2015.igem.org/Team:Birkbeck/Results/adjusting_table_code ; use this link. its a spoof web page.--> | <!--For sorting out code to make it look decent on our wiki; https://2015.igem.org/Team:Birkbeck/Results/adjusting_table_code ; use this link. its a spoof web page.--> | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 16:50, 8 September 2015
Birkbeck iGEM
The Owligos are the first-ever team entered into the international Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) Competition by Birkbeck, University of London. We’re a varied group of students who reflect the diversity and unique character of our institution: many of us have chosen science as a second career, having already spent some time in full-time work. For most of us, this has meant making our way through a degree while continuing to work full-time. Hopefully this kind of dedication will help us successfully navigate our way through our iGEM project.
Project Aim
Our project aims to create a new diagnostic solution that will be low-tech and cost-effective enough to allow its usage in deprived and remote communities. We’re attempting to engineer a bacteriophage lambda chassis to change its host affinity, while simultaneously adding a marker that will facilitate easy detection of a target bacterial pathogen in patient samples.
To demonstrate this approach as a proof of concept for the competition, we plan to change this affinity between different strains of E.coli; however, ultimately we hope to demonstrate that this principle could also be applied to alter the phage’s host range to other bacterial species. We could then provide a modular system capable of diagnosing a range of diseases. Of course, we haven’t chosen a simple goal. But as Birkbeck pioneers, we are determined to prove ourselves by making our project a success. We can’t wait to present the results of our work at the Giant Jamboree in September!
Under Construction
Fig. 1: Growth Curve of E. coli DH5α Strains Following Culture Optical Density of 600 nm.
Growth kinetics was initially studied using 50 mL cultures. Fig. 1 shows the growth kinetics of E. coli DH5α & derivative strains containing plasmids from the InterLab study. The growth curve shows that the E. coli strain that contains the P1-gfp expression device grows at a slower rate than the other strains investigated. At 220 minutes the E. coli DH5α P1 strain has a significantly lower OD600 than the E. coli DH5α (P=0.023). E. coli DH5α remains very highly significantly higher in OD600 than E. coli DH5α with the P1-gfp expression device (P=<0.001). The only difference between the E. coli DH5α & E. coli DH5α positive control device is observed at 280 minutes into the growth curve (P=0.016) where the positive control has a higher OD600. The multiple comparison table showing P values can be viewed in Table S1
.Fig. 2: Growth Curve of E. coli DH5α Strains Following Culture Optical Density of 395 nm.
In order to investigate if there could be a point in the E. coli DH5α growth curve in which a signal from the GFP could be detected by absorbance, the growth curves were also conducted using the major absorption peak of GFP (wavelength 395 nm) . The growth curve data for the culture optical density is displayed in Fig. 2.
Fig. 3: Viable Count of E. coli DH5α After 60 mins.
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
Viable Count | 9 | 1600000 | 3750000 | 2566666.67 | 627495.020 |
Valid N (listwise) | 9 | ||||
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics of 60 minutes Viable Count of E. coli DH5α..
Fig. 4: Viable Count of E. coli DH5α After 175 mins.
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
Viable Count | 9 | 90000000 | 175000000 | 133333333.33 | 29154759.474 |
Valid N (listwise) | 9 | ||||