Difference between revisions of "Team:KU Leuven/InterLabStudy/Protocol"
Laetitia VW (Talk | contribs) |
Laetitia VW (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
</a> | </a> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 21:37, 13 September 2015
Protocol
Introduction
We began our experiments by constructing devices that contained constitutive
promoters with low (J23117), medium (J23106) and higher (J23101) strength.
Each promotor was coupled to biobrick I13504, containing a RBS, GFP protein and a double terminator.
We transformed the above mentioned biobrick and the promoters in E.
cloni competent cells. The cells were grown on LB (Sigma-Aldrich) 1.5% agar (VWR Chemicals) plates with chloramphenicol (from Acros Organics) as a selection
marker. As a positive control, we transformed the cells with pUC19 plasmid and
plated them on LB plates containing ampicillin. We also plated E. cloni without any
plasmid as a negative control on LB plates containing chloramphenicol. We
performed transformation of the biobricks twice by using chemically competent
cells. The first time, we did not obtain any colonies of the four biobricks. The
second time we got very few colonies. Nevertheless, the positive controls were
correct every time, and we did double check the efficiency of the cells that
proved to be very high. We concluded that our constructs were not easy to
transform into our E. cloni. Therefore, we
switched to electroporation. This technique gave a higher efficiency and enough
colonies for our experiments.
Thereafter we proceeded using the Biobrick Assembly Method to assemble the DNA.
Subsequently we performed transformation using electrocompetent E.cloni cells,
plated them in LB agar plates with antibiotic selection markers, and the plates
were illuminated with blue/UV-light to check for the presence of GFP, and thus
the functioning device.
For the fluorescent measurements, we inoculated liquid cultures(3
mL-LB + Antibiotic) in polypropylene round-bottom tubes and incubated them for 16
to 18 hours in a shaking incubator (200 rpm) at 37 degrees. We recorded the
fluorescent data from cells grown to an OD of ~0.5 (if the OD was higher, it was brought
in the range 0.48-0.52) at 300 nm. Finally, the fluorescence data were collected
from the overnight cultures of the constructed devices with an excitation and
emission wavelengths of 483 nm and 525 nm respectively, in a 96-well plate by an
Tecan Safire2 monochromator MTP Reader. Also, the absorbance measurements at 600
nm were repeated in the plate reader. This is important because the absorbance
depends on the path length.
Methodology
Worksheet
Our wetlab team worked well together to fulfill this challenge. Vincent Van Deuren and Laurens Vandenbroek performed the biobrick assembly and the transformation experiments. The measurements were recorded by Laetitia Van Wonterghem, Ovia Margaret Thirukkumaran and Laurens Vandenbroek. Laura Van Hese, Astrid Deryckere, Ines Cottignie and Vincent Van Deuren carried out the restriction digestion to check for the inserts. Finally, the results were processed by Ovia Margaret Thirukkumaran and Laurens Vandenbroek, and our wiki-page was filled with provided data by Vincent Van Deuren
To grow our cells, we made use of a New Brunswick Innova® 43/43R Shaker purchased in Eppendorf. This incubator has a throw of 2.54 cm. Our devices were measured by a Tecan Safire2 monochromator MTP Reader. This machine was last calibrated on the 31th of March in 2015 by Tecan and our measurements took place on the 25th of August in 2015. The cells were excited at 483 nm and the emission was recorded at 525 nm. To capture the light emission, a Quad4 Monochromator was used. The absorbance was measured at 600 nm with a sampling frequency of 0.11 seconds/ sample while the sampling frequency of the fluorescence was 0.15 seconds/sample.
Contact
Address: Celestijnenlaan 200G room 00.08 - 3001 Heverlee
Telephone n°: +32(0)16 32 73 19
Mail: igem@chem.kuleuven.be
