Difference between revisions of "Team:SDU-Denmark/Tour54"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | + | <a class="popupImg alignRight" style="width:300px" target="_blank" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1f/SDU2015_InterlabStudyData.png" title=""> | |
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a9/SDU2015_InterlabStudyData_thumbnail.png" style="width:300px"/> | ||
| + | <b> Figure 2:</b> | ||
| + | </a> | ||
<span class="intro">Once the final constructs</span> were made, each construct were veryfied through colony PCR, and sequencing. | <span class="intro">Once the final constructs</span> were made, each construct were veryfied through colony PCR, and sequencing. | ||
For the measurements conducted in this project we used FACS. | For the measurements conducted in this project we used FACS. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 33: | ||
Although veryfied through colony PCR, one construct seemed faulty, due to irregular measurments, and inconclusive sequencing. | Although veryfied through colony PCR, one construct seemed faulty, due to irregular measurments, and inconclusive sequencing. | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 11:13, 16 September 2015
Interlab study
Figure 1:
Our team has been participating in the interlab study, to characterize three different promoters, using GFP.
The three constructs were made through standard biobrick assembly, inserting GFP into plasmids containing different promoters. The final construct were transformed into E. coli K12 TOP10.
Figure 2:
Once the final constructs were made, each construct were veryfied through colony PCR, and sequencing.
For the measurements conducted in this project we used FACS.
FACS functions through singling out droplets containing cells, exciting the proteins by shooting light on the absorption frequency onto the cells, then by measuring the emission intensity, the fluorescence of each cell is measured.
When measuring we used our own construct rfirefhyiw as a positive control, and TOP10 as negative control.
Each construct were in the experiment measured in both biological and technical triplicates.
Although veryfied through colony PCR, one construct seemed faulty, due to irregular measurments, and inconclusive sequencing.