Difference between revisions of "Team:Amoy/Description"
ShannonLee (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
<p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 2</strong> The synthesis of L-tert-leucine</p> | <p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 2</strong> The synthesis of L-tert-leucine</p> | ||
− | <p class="main_p"></br></br>To optimize this circle, we have tried many methods. Finally we constructed one genetic circuit containing two target genes and use whole-cell catalysts. There are several advantages using this method. Firstly, none or only very little external cofactor is required, because it is already contained in the whole-cell biocatalyst with the help of cofactor regeneration. Secondly, only one fermentation is required to produce the biocatalyst compared to two separate fermentations to clone cells containing LeuDH and FDH respectively, which is much more convenient. What’s more the biocatalyst is suitable for high-cell density fermentations. No isolation or purification of enzymes are required so that the cost become lower. Last but not least, whole-cell catalysts can achieve the effect of premix, which help to make the two enzymes cooperate well. In a word, the method we adopt not only can lower the cost but also makes it easy for us to adjust the expression level of the two target genes.</br></p> | + | <p class="main_p"></br></br>To optimize this circle, we have tried many methods. Finally we constructed one genetic circuit containing two target genes and use whole-cell catalysts. There are several advantages using this method. Firstly, none or only very little external cofactor is required, because it is already contained in the whole-cell biocatalyst with the help of cofactor regeneration. Secondly, only one fermentation is required to produce the biocatalyst compared to two separate fermentations to clone cells containing <i>LeuDH</i> and <i>FDH</i> respectively, which is much more convenient. What’s more the biocatalyst is suitable for high-cell density fermentations. No isolation or purification of enzymes are required so that the cost become lower. Last but not least, whole-cell catalysts can achieve the effect of premix, which help to make the two enzymes cooperate well. In a word, the method we adopt not only can lower the cost but also makes it easy for us to adjust the expression level of the two target genes.</br></p> |
<img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0f/Amoy-Project_Description_fig3.png" style="width: 100%;" /> | <img class="main_img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0f/Amoy-Project_Description_fig3.png" style="width: 100%;" /> | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
<p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 4</strong> Different activities of leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase</p> | <p class="figure" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 20px;"><strong>Figure 4</strong> Different activities of leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase</p> | ||
− | <p class="main_p"></br></br>The whole plan is to regulate the efficiency of ribosome binding site. In other words, RBS, to control the strength of LeuDH and FDH. With the help of mathematical modeling, the most suitable efficiency of RBS of leucine dehydrogenase will be obtained. Consequently, the | + | <p class="main_p"></br></br>The whole plan is to regulate the efficiency of ribosome binding site. In other words, RBS, to control the strength of <i>LeuDH</i> and <i>FDH</i>. With the help of mathematical modeling, the most suitable efficiency of RBS of leucine dehydrogenase will be obtained. Consequently, the cofactor NADH can be self-sufficient as shown in this cycle. We have investigated lots of RBSs and tried to choose the most probable pair of RBS and we choose B0032、B0030 and B0034 for plasmid construction. Through this way, it is quite easier to control RBS strength in one circuit.</br></p> |
Revision as of 10:33, 17 September 2015
DESCIPTION
L-tert-leucine is an unnatural amino acid which plays an important role in various industrial products, especially in pharmaceuticals. Due to the specific steric hindrance of its side chain, L-tert-leucine is important in asymmetric synthesis. It is also an indispensable intermediate to synthesis drugs such as Atazanavir. Atazanavir is one of the most effective HIV-protease inhibitor confirmed by FDA. As we all know, AIDs is an awful disease which has disturbed human for many years. Lots of people suffered from ADIS and died in pain. To synthesis L-tert-leucine with high chiral selectivity on a large scale is still a challenge for human.
Figure 1 The structure of L-tert-leucine
With its importance, many methodologies were developed for its preparation in the past decades. Scientists have developed enzymatic reductive amination to produce L-tert-leucine by using leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase. This technology greatly improved the yield and excellent enantiomeric excess of L-tert-leucine. It is regarded to be one of the most efficient routes.
Figure 2 The synthesis of L-tert-leucine
To optimize this circle, we have tried many methods. Finally we constructed one genetic circuit containing two target genes and use whole-cell catalysts. There are several advantages using this method. Firstly, none or only very little external cofactor is required, because it is already contained in the whole-cell biocatalyst with the help of cofactor regeneration. Secondly, only one fermentation is required to produce the biocatalyst compared to two separate fermentations to clone cells containing LeuDH and FDH respectively, which is much more convenient. What’s more the biocatalyst is suitable for high-cell density fermentations. No isolation or purification of enzymes are required so that the cost become lower. Last but not least, whole-cell catalysts can achieve the effect of premix, which help to make the two enzymes cooperate well. In a word, the method we adopt not only can lower the cost but also makes it easy for us to adjust the expression level of the two target genes.
Figure 3 The circuit constructed
However, owing to different activity of leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase, the NADH consumption rate does not equal to its regeneration. Therefore, it is necessary to add excess NADH. The cofactor-NADH is a pretty expensive raw material, which will make the mass production of L-tert-leucine not cost-effective.
Figure 4 Different activities of leucine dehydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase
The whole plan is to regulate the efficiency of ribosome binding site. In other words, RBS, to control the strength of LeuDH and FDH. With the help of mathematical modeling, the most suitable efficiency of RBS of leucine dehydrogenase will be obtained. Consequently, the cofactor NADH can be self-sufficient as shown in this cycle. We have investigated lots of RBSs and tried to choose the most probable pair of RBS and we choose B0032、B0030 and B0034 for plasmid construction. Through this way, it is quite easier to control RBS strength in one circuit.
CONTACT US
Email: igemxmu@gmail.com
Website: 2015.igem.org/Team:Amoy
Address: Xiamen University, No. 422, Siming South Road, Xiamen, Fujian, P.R.China 361005