Difference between revisions of "Team:Aalto-Helsinki/Parts"
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
<p>Our Propane 1 includes 3 of the 10 required genes to produce propane in <i>E. coli</i>. The plasmid has been assembled from IDT's gBlocks with NEBuilder assembly, similar to Gibson Assembly.</p> | <p>Our Propane 1 includes 3 of the 10 required genes to produce propane in <i>E. coli</i>. The plasmid has been assembled from IDT's gBlocks with NEBuilder assembly, similar to Gibson Assembly.</p> | ||
− | <p><b>Validation:</b> We restricted our Propane 1 and ran the insert on an agarose gel. From the picture we can tell that the | + | <p><b>Validation:</b> We restricted our Propane 1 and ran the insert on an agarose gel. From the picture we can tell that the plasmid's size is correct. The result can be seen in <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3a/Aalto-Helsinki_car_submittedparts.png">Figure 2.</a><br/> |
Additionally, we did a colony PCR with VR and our primer P001. The VR primer attaches to our plasmid's backbone while P001 anneals with the very beginning of our construct. With this colony PCR we were able to show that the insert is present and it is indeed in the pSB1C3 backbone. See <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d1/Aalto-Helsinki_submittedparts_colony_pcr_validation.png">figure 3</a> for results, where the product in wells 1, and 5-10 is of the right size.</p> | Additionally, we did a colony PCR with VR and our primer P001. The VR primer attaches to our plasmid's backbone while P001 anneals with the very beginning of our construct. With this colony PCR we were able to show that the insert is present and it is indeed in the pSB1C3 backbone. See <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d1/Aalto-Helsinki_submittedparts_colony_pcr_validation.png">figure 3</a> for results, where the product in wells 1, and 5-10 is of the right size.</p> | ||
<p>The colony which produced the product seen in figure 3, well 10 was sent to the registry under the name <b><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1655000">BBa_K1655000</a></b>.</p> | <p>The colony which produced the product seen in figure 3, well 10 was sent to the registry under the name <b><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1655000">BBa_K1655000</a></b>.</p> | ||
Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
<figcaption><center><b>Figure 9.</b> Amphiphilic Brick</center></figcaption> | <figcaption><center><b>Figure 9.</b> Amphiphilic Brick</center></figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
− | <p>We submitted a sole amphiphilic brick, containing only the coding region of the ampihphilic protein. This brick can be used to produce intracellular micelles or vesicles under any chosen expression system. Our amphiphilic protein is constructed so that the hydrophilic part is translated first. According to Huber et al. this allows for the formation on of intracellular micelles and vesicles. If the hydrophobic domain was to be translated first, the amphiphils would only form micelles.<p> | + | <p>We submitted a sole amphiphilic brick, containing only the coding region of the ampihphilic protein. This brick can be used to produce intracellular micelles or vesicles under any chosen expression system. Our amphiphilic protein is constructed so that the hydrophilic part is translated first. According to <a href="http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v14/n1/abs/nmat4118.html">Huber <i>et al.</i></a> this allows for the formation on of intracellular micelles and vesicles. If the hydrophobic domain was to be translated first, the amphiphils would only form micelles.<p> |
− | <p><b>Validation:</b> Our amphiphilic brick's sequencing results were unclear, as the brick is mainly built of short repeats. We have however been able to show the size on this insert in the pSB1C3 backbone is | + | <p><b>Validation:</b> Our amphiphilic brick's sequencing results were unclear, as the brick is mainly built of short repeats. We have however been able to show that the size on this insert in the pSB1C3 backbone is correct. See figure 10 for a gel electrophoresis image. The DNA from the colony which produced the product seen in well 2 was sent to the registry. We were also able to show, that once this Amphiphilic brick is fused to a GFP, the GFP is expressed and again, the construct size is correct. See figure 11. Although the sequencing results are unclear, there seemed to be no premature stop codons in the sequence. This leads us to believe, that the Amphiphilic protein was indeed translated. We weren't able to detect the micelles and vesicles because of low accuracy of the microscopic images or because our expression level was too high. Our promoter is 10 times more efficient than the one that has been previously used to produce micelles and vesicles with this amphiphilic protein. The high concentration of amphiphils is likely to interfere with the micelle and vesicle formation.<br/><br/></p> |
<p><span style="color:red"><b>Note!</b></span> The submitted BioBrick does most likely not contain the correct sequence. Restriction analysis lead us to initially believe we had the correct insert, as the insert size in pSB1C3 backbone matched that of the correct sequence (figure 10). However, as we proceeded to the sequencing results of the then already submitted brick a day before the wiki freeze, we found out that the sequence was not that of the amphiphilic protein, but instead that of the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K592009">blue chromoprotein</a>.</p> | <p><span style="color:red"><b>Note!</b></span> The submitted BioBrick does most likely not contain the correct sequence. Restriction analysis lead us to initially believe we had the correct insert, as the insert size in pSB1C3 backbone matched that of the correct sequence (figure 10). However, as we proceeded to the sequencing results of the then already submitted brick a day before the wiki freeze, we found out that the sequence was not that of the amphiphilic protein, but instead that of the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K592009">blue chromoprotein</a>.</p> |
Revision as of 06:09, 18 September 2015