Result toehold secondary structure prediction

RESULTS
The pictures are the secondary structure prediction of four toehold switches that we design, which we want to use to sensor the four biomarkers we choose to detect in oral cancer’s patients’ saliva. We use the website RNA structure :
(http://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/RNAstructureWeb/Servers/Predict1/Predict1.html)
to predict their secondary structures. These structures must have the hairpin structure, which could have the switch on-off mechanism to sensor the target RNA and trigger RNA we design to test its efficiency, and further the sensitivity and specificity of this detection method. Also, the secondary structure can’t be annealed randomly, and the linker and trigger RNA can’t be complementary. These four sequences secondary structure are correspond with our expectation. Then we can further do the experiment of construction of toehold switches.

Plasmid construction we have done

We construct toehold switch part in pSB1C3 backbone, and construct trigger in pSB1AK8 backbone for use different antibiotic to check whether the bacteria uptake both plasmids in it.

RESULTS
These two plasmids are what we have constructed. One is toehold switch with T7 promoter and luciferase in pSB1C3 backbone; the other is trigger RNA with T7 promoter in pSB1AK8 backbone. The pSB1C3 T7-toehold-luciferase construct also has Ampicillin antibiotic for selection. On the other hand, the pSB1C3 T7-trigger construct contain chloramphenicol antibiotic for selection. The two plasmids are constructed in different backbones for further cotransformation selection, this way we can check whether the two plasmids are both successfully uptaken by the bacteria.

Restriction enzyme digestion

(A) 1. Luciferase cut with EcoRI and XbaI. Lane 1 and 4, 3 μg of luciferase digested by EcoRI and XbaI ; Lane 2, 1K DNA marker ; Lane 3, 3 μg of luciferase not digested by EcoRI and XbaI. (B) Restriction enzyme digestion of synthetic toehold and trigger RNA with EcoRI and SpeI. Samples were run in 1% agarose gel. Lane 1, 1kb DNA marker；Lane 2-5, 125 ng of synthetic DNA fragment that would transcribe into toehold sensors (SAT、DUSP1、IL-1β、IL-8 ) were digested by EcoRI and SpeI；Lane 6-9, 125 ng of DNA fragment that would transcribe into trigger RNAs (SAT、DUSP1、IL-1β、IL-8 ) were digested by EcoRI and SpeI. (C) T7 promoter digestion with restriction enzyme PstI and SpeI. Lane 1, marker ; Lane 2, 3 μg T7 promoter digested by restriction enzyme PstI and SpeI.

RESULTS
  Preparation of parts to construct two vectors system
    We use enzyme to digest, and cut out the bands we want, and then run electrophoresis then amplifying the toehold and trigger RNA we would use. In Figure A, the backbone, pSB1AK8, is 3426 base pairs, when it be digested with restriction enzyme and added luciferase, which is 1653 base pairs, it would be 4937 base pairs. Then we use enzyme EcoRI and XbaI to digest the plasmid. The results match our expectations.
    According to Figure B, toehold and trigger RNA. To cut out the toehold and trigger RNAs, we digest them with EcoRI and SpeI. The toehold switch sensor are all 167 base pairs, the trigger RNAs are 149 base pairs. The results match our expectation. In Figure C, we use restriction enzyme PstI and SpeI to digest. Then cut out the T7 promoter, thus further we could amplify the T7 promoter. The T7 promoter part in pSB1AK8 is about 3K .
    After we confirm the sequences are correct, we digest toehold switches, luciferases from pSB1AK8, trigger RNAs, and T7 promoters from pSB1C3. Then we construct two vectors, one contains T7 promoter luciferase and toehold switch sequence in pSB1C3 backbone ; the other vector, pSB1AK8, contains T7 promoter trigger RNAs sequence. After construct these two vectors, we sent it to the biotechnology company to confirm the sequence. The confirmed final plasmids are showed in Figure 7. In the future, we will cotransform these two vector into BL21*DE3 and test the luciferase’s brightness, then we can lysate the bacteria, which already have these two plasmids, and use ELISA reader to test whether there is light or not. Further to build the sensitivity standard curve.
  Discussion
    In Figure , the size of cut is about 5 K. Uncut DNA’s structure is supercoil, it should be below of the cut DNA. After discuss with the advisor, we still don’t know the reason why the uncut doesn’t meet our expectation. We predict that the structure of uncut plasmid didn’t fold perfectly, so it can’t run rapidly.

Luciferase brightness test

After construct two plasmids, we want to test the sensor efficiency of the toehold switch structure. So we then transform the two plasmids into BL21 bacteria then break the bacteria to get lysate. We use PCR to make a positive control, a fragment of sequence contains T7 promoter, toehold switch, and luciferase. And our negative control for this part is T7 promoter with luciferase.

RESULTS
The table is the outcome of the luciferase brightness test. In our prediction, if we add the trigger RNA, which simulate the environment of oral cancer patients’ saliva in real world, the toehold switches we design should be triggered, then the hairpin structure would be open, downstream reporter gene thus can be translated. Experimental group and we Positive control we use T7 promoter with luciferase, so its reporter gene must be expressed. On the other hand, negative control is T7promoter, toehold switch, and luciferase, but without trigger RNA. As you can see, IL8 ,DUSP1,SAT experimental group’s data is just as twice of the negative control, but it still means that the triggered toehold switches function almost acceptable and not triggered ones’ hairpin aren’t open, corresponding with our expectation.

PCR for T7-luciferase

In the figure, each lane are 10 μl of PCR products, we use temperature gradient (50°C, 53°C, 56°C, 59°C, 62°C, 65°C) to test the product of which temperature condition is suitable to be our negative control of in vivo functional assay.

RESULTS
To do the in vivo part of functional assay, we must have control condition. This figure shows the process that we use temperature gradient to choose which temperature is the most appropriate for us to do the experiment of the in vivo part of functional assay. Finally, we choose the result of 53 °C for PCR. Because the product of 53 °C condition is much clearer, also much brighter then other conditions.