Difference between revisions of "Team:Dundee/Forensic Toolkit/Fingerprints"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <head> | ||
+ | <link href="css/bootstrap.css" rel="stylesheet"> | ||
+ | <link href="css/style.css" rel="stylesheet"> | ||
+ | <link href="css/font-awesome.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/> | ||
+ | <link href="css/offline-font.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/> | ||
+ | <script src="js/jquery.js"></script> | ||
+ | <script src="js/bootstrap.js"></script> | ||
+ | </head> | ||
+ | |||
<html> | <html> | ||
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> | <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> | ||
Line 47: | Line 56: | ||
− | <p>Fingerprints are used in forensics as visual identification due to the unique ridge patterns between individuals. In dermatoglyphics, the scientific study of fingerprints, there is a key distinction between the terms ‘fingerprint’ and ‘fingermark’. Fingerprints are defined as the intentional imprint on a surface for recording purposes and often with the use of enhancement reagents to make the impressions distinct and fluorescent. ‘Fingermarks’ are incomplete (either smudged or distorted) impressions deposited incidentally on surfaces. Latent fingermarks are the most common type of fingerprint evidence found at crime scenes. The often blurred ridges add an extra depth of complexity when trying to link the fingermark found at a crime scene to the fingerprint of a suspect. Despite the heavy usage of fingerprint evidence for criminal investigations, the forensic procedure comes with its limitations. The most common evasions of prosecution in court are: | + | <p>Fingerprints are used in forensics as visual identification due to the unique ridge patterns between individuals. In dermatoglyphics, the scientific study of fingerprints, there is a key distinction between the terms ‘fingerprint’ and ‘fingermark’. Fingerprints are defined as the intentional imprint on a surface for recording purposes and often with the use of enhancement reagents to make the impressions distinct and fluorescent. ‘Fingermarks’ are incomplete (either smudged or distorted) impressions deposited incidentally on surfaces. Latent fingermarks are the most common type of fingerprint evidence found at crime scenes. The often blurred ridges add an extra depth of complexity when trying to link the fingermark found at a crime scene to the fingerprint of a suspect. Despite the heavy usage of fingerprint evidence for criminal investigations, the forensic procedure comes with its limitations. The most common evasions of prosecution in court are: |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>The fingerprints of the suspect were found on a movable object.</li> | <li>The fingerprints of the suspect were found on a movable object.</li> | ||
<li>There is an absence of evidence as to when the fingerprints were placed.</li> | <li>There is an absence of evidence as to when the fingerprints were placed.</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
− | + | Both arguments could be effectively eliminated if a test existed that could date fingermarks left at crime scenes. The area of dating fingermarks based on their chemical composition is a relatively unexplored field in forensic sciences. This is due to the lack of reliability of proposed techniques. It has been suggested in theory, it may be possible to age fingerprints based on quantitative changes of kinetic compounds found in fingerprints.</p> | |
<p>Following the information obtained from the modelling team (link to mathematical modelling page), squalene was found to be the best compound to target within the fingerprint. Squalene was found to be present up to 21 days once the fingerprint was deposited. When talking to fingerprint experts it was suggested that it would be more beneficial to identify a component that could narrow down the age of a fingerprint to one week or less. Squalene is an intermediate in the pathway to the production of Cholesterol and looking down from squalene we identified squalene epoxide.</p> | <p>Following the information obtained from the modelling team (link to mathematical modelling page), squalene was found to be the best compound to target within the fingerprint. Squalene was found to be present up to 21 days once the fingerprint was deposited. When talking to fingerprint experts it was suggested that it would be more beneficial to identify a component that could narrow down the age of a fingerprint to one week or less. Squalene is an intermediate in the pathway to the production of Cholesterol and looking down from squalene we identified squalene epoxide.</p> |
Revision as of 16:08, 18 September 2015
<head>
<link href="css/bootstrap.css" rel="stylesheet"> <link href="css/style.css" rel="stylesheet"> <link href="css/font-awesome.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/> <link href="css/offline-font.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/> <script src="js/jquery.js"></script> <script src="js/bootstrap.js"></script>
</head>
Abstract
Lanosterol synthase (LSS) an oxidosqualene cyclase (OSC) enzyme that specifically binds to squalene epoxide (2,3- oxidosqualene), which is present in fingerprints. We successfully managed to clone lanosterol synthase into pSB1C3 and the over expression vector pQE80-L and successfully characterised using an anti-His antibody. We then continued on in the hope to purify this enzyme from E. coli using Nickel affinity chromatography.
Introduction
Fingerprints are defined as the ridge impressions left on a surface by a fingertip. They are the most commonly used form of criminal evidence globally, either equating or outnumbering all other forms of forensic evidence combined. A typical fingerprint is composed of 95% water with the remaining 5% being a mixture of both organic and inorganic compounds from the eccrine sweat and sebaceous glands. Figure 1 illustrates the key variables that interact and influence the composition of a fingerprint.
Lanosterol synthase is an enzyme that converts squalene epoxide to lanosterol in the pathway from squalene to cholesterol (Fig 2).
Fingerprints are used in forensics as visual identification due to the unique ridge patterns between individuals. In dermatoglyphics, the scientific study of fingerprints, there is a key distinction between the terms ‘fingerprint’ and ‘fingermark’. Fingerprints are defined as the intentional imprint on a surface for recording purposes and often with the use of enhancement reagents to make the impressions distinct and fluorescent. ‘Fingermarks’ are incomplete (either smudged or distorted) impressions deposited incidentally on surfaces. Latent fingermarks are the most common type of fingerprint evidence found at crime scenes. The often blurred ridges add an extra depth of complexity when trying to link the fingermark found at a crime scene to the fingerprint of a suspect. Despite the heavy usage of fingerprint evidence for criminal investigations, the forensic procedure comes with its limitations. The most common evasions of prosecution in court are:
- The fingerprints of the suspect were found on a movable object.
- There is an absence of evidence as to when the fingerprints were placed.
Following the information obtained from the modelling team (link to mathematical modelling page), squalene was found to be the best compound to target within the fingerprint. Squalene was found to be present up to 21 days once the fingerprint was deposited. When talking to fingerprint experts it was suggested that it would be more beneficial to identify a component that could narrow down the age of a fingerprint to one week or less. Squalene is an intermediate in the pathway to the production of Cholesterol and looking down from squalene we identified squalene epoxide.
Using fluorescent nanobeads, we would like to detect the presence of squalene epoxide through the use of its specific enzyme lanosterol synthase. By fusing lanosterol synthase to the fluorescent nanobead, when applied to a fingerprint the nanobead would bind to squalene epoxide, if present, and therefore fluoresce. The current procedure of detecting quantities of chemical compounds in fingerprints is gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Despite the accuracy the current technique provides it comes with the flaw that it completely destroys the fingerprint evidence. A fluorescent biosensor device comes with the advantage of keeping the evidence intact for other analyses.
Results
The first step of this process was optimising the gene encoding lanosterol synthase for E.coli and modifying them to ensure they were compatible with Biobrick specifications and standards. This was then ordered from IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies ) and cloned into pSB1C3 to give the following biobrick.
This was then sub cloned into the pQE80-L vector which allows for inducible expressions of our target protein along with an N-terminal histidine tag. Using the pQE80-L vector we aimed to overexpress LSS and attempted to purify it using nickel affinity chromatography.
Initially western blots were undertaken to test for the production of LSS-His. We transformed our plasmid encoding LSS-His into E.coli strain M15 pREP4 and blotted for recombinantely expressed protein. Fig bla shows the expression of LSS within our system.
As shown in fig 4, there is successful overexpression of lanosterol synthase (expected mass 83kDa) along with traces of degradation. Upon successful expression of LSS- His 4 litre cultures were grown up for protein purification purposes, under the same conditions. Using FPLC, the supernatant was loaded onto a nickel column and the protein was eluted using an increasing concentration of imidazole. The results from this can be seen in figure 5.
Lanosterol synthase was expected to be 83kDa, however the majority of protein purified is at 37kDa. This was further analysed by carrying out a western blot to detect for any full length LSS- His purified.
The results obtained from the blot showed no presence of lanosterol synthase at 83kDa, suggesting we are only detecting a degraded version of it instead of the whole enzyme. The purification conditions will have to be optimized in order to continue with our fingerprint aging device.
Future Work
After purification and characterisation, through site-specific mutagenesis, the active sites (positions 232 and 455) could be inactivated to guarantee that the enzyme wouldn’t destroy any vital evidence on the scene or convert the present squalene epoxide into lanosterol.
References
- Jones, B. Comprehensive Medical Terminology: A Competency-Based Approach. 3rd ed. Thomson Delmar Learning, USA; 2008.
- Adebisi, S. S. Fingerprint Studies-The Recent Challenges and Advancements: A Literary View. The Internet Journal of Biological Anthropology, 2, 1-15; 2009.
- Llewellyn, P. Jr., Dinkins, L. New use for an old friend. J. Forensic Identif. 1995; 42:498–503.
- Yamashita, B., French, M. in: J. Barnes (Ed.) Fingerprint Sourcebook, NCJ 225320. US Department of Justice, Washington; 2011
- Frick, Amanda Akiko. Chemical investigations into the lipid fraction of latent fingermark residue; 2015.