Difference between revisions of "Template:Heidelberg/ivt/results"
Max Seidel (Talk | contribs) |
m (size of graphics) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Fig. 3. Fusion of Aptamers to Spinach to generate fluorescent small molecule sensors. </div> | Fig. 3. Fusion of Aptamers to Spinach to generate fluorescent small molecule sensors. </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrapperimage"> | <div class="imagewrapperimage"> | ||
− | <img class="img-responsive" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015 | + | <img class="img-responsive" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c2/HeidelbergMS003.png"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrappercaption"> | <div class="imagewrappercaption"> | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Fig. 4. Establishment of a system to sense small molecule using the Spinach2 Aptamer. </div> | Fig. 4. Establishment of a system to sense small molecule using the Spinach2 Aptamer. </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrapperimage"> | <div class="imagewrapperimage"> | ||
− | <img class="img-responsive" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015 | + | <img class="img-responsive" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1b/HeidelbergMS004.png"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrappercaption"> | <div class="imagewrappercaption"> | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
Fig. 5. Analysis of an <i>in vitro</i> transcription by thin layer chromatography. </div> | Fig. 5. Analysis of an <i>in vitro</i> transcription by thin layer chromatography. </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrapperimage"> | <div class="imagewrapperimage"> | ||
− | <img class="img-responsive" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015 | + | <img class="img-responsive" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4a/HeidelbergMS005.png"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrappercaption"> | <div class="imagewrappercaption"> | ||
Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
Fig. 9. Real time monitoring of RNA synthesis and ATP consumption in presence of inhibitors. </div> | Fig. 9. Real time monitoring of RNA synthesis and ATP consumption in presence of inhibitors. </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrapperimage"> | <div class="imagewrapperimage"> | ||
− | <img class="img-responsive" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015 | + | <img class="img-responsive" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3b/HeidelbergMS009.png"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrappercaption"> | <div class="imagewrappercaption"> | ||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
Fig. 10. Application of the Spinach/Malachite Green readout system to improve buffer conditions for the transcription. </div> | Fig. 10. Application of the Spinach/Malachite Green readout system to improve buffer conditions for the transcription. </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrapperimage"> | <div class="imagewrapperimage"> | ||
− | <img class="img-responsive" src=" https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015 | + | <img class="img-responsive" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b1/HeidelbergMS010.png"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="imagewrappercaption"> | <div class="imagewrappercaption"> |
Revision as of 17:13, 18 September 2015
Results
Establishment of a System to Sense Small Molecule Using the Spinach2 Aptamer
To establish a stable, reproducible system in lab that is able to sense small molecules in real time using a fluorescent readout, we applied the already published c-di-GMP Spinach2 system first
To analyze the functionality of our small molecule sensor system, we amplified all constructs, including, Spinach2, c-di-GMP Spinach2 and ATP Aptamer Spinach2 sensors by PCR and transcribed them in vitro successfully. The RNA was analyzed for its specific binding to a small molecule by a highly sensitive fluorometer. Figure 4 shows the results of the fluorescence measurements. All Spinach2 systems show fluorescence maxima at 500 nm in presence of the ligand. The original Spinach2
Common Techniques of Sensing Small Molecules in Biochemical Reactions
Analyzing biochemical reactions depend on radioactive labeling. Yet, many laboratories try to avoid the usage of radioactivity since it is connected to affect the health. Our established ATP Aptamer Spinach2 sensor system enables the sensing low concentrated small molecules like ATP within in vitro assays. In this context the change of ATP concentration during the in vitro transcription reaction is an attractive target to study. NTPs are genially consumed by a RNA polymerase over time. To monitor the decrease of ATP during a successful in vitro transcription, we applied thin layer chromatography first (Fig. 5). To analyze ATP and not GTP/CTP or UTP by the TLC, the remaining ATP was converted to AMP via an apyrase reaction. However, we cannot identify significant changes of the ATP concentration on the TLC plate because of the low sensitivity of this method.
Highly Sensitive Sensing of Small Molecules via Spinach in Biochemical Reactions in Real time
Common techniques like TLC have a very poor limit of detection. Especially in our studies, a highly sensitive method is needed to visualize ATP concentration in biochemical reactions. Thus, we can apply our ATP AptamerJAWS1 Spinach2 system so sense consumption of ATP in real time (Fig. 6). To show the general feasibility of our system we titrated the T7 RNA polymerase concentration in in vitro transcription reaction. We monitored the fluorescence signal of the ATP AptamerJAWS1 Spinach2 in regular intervals. In presence of a high RNA polymerase concentration we would expect the highest turn-off effect of the fluorescence. In Figure 6B we show the results of the real time measurements of the spinach fluorescence. As expected we can show that the ATP signal decreases rapidly in presence of a high concentration of polymerase. In contrast, if less RNA polymerase was applied, the measured fluorescence is much higher. To confirm the results of the fluorescence measurements, we analyzed the in vitro transcription reaction using denaturing acrylamide gels in addition (Fig. 6C). Similar to the fluorescent readout, we were able to identify the most intense bands in presence of high T7 RNA polymerase.
in vitro Transcription Using a Fluorescent RNA of Interest
To substitute the time-consuming analysis of in vitro transcription by denaturing acrylamide gel electrophoresis, we established a second read-out system. Using this system we want to monitor RNA synthesis in real time (Fig. 7). For this purpose we applied a DNA transcription template which encodes the Malachite Green Aptamer
To analyze the functionality and fluorescent properties of the Malachite Green Aptamer we performed in vitro transcriptions and measured fluorescence in regular intervals. We prepared two negative controls (Blank) which were either depleted with T7 RNA Polymerase or without malachite green. The functional setup contains DNA template, polymerase as well as malachite green dye to monitor the transcription in real time by an increase of the fluorescence signal. If our Malachite-Green Aptamer read-out system functions properly, we expect an increase at an emission wavelength of 650 nm only for functional setup. The blank values should stay at zero. The results (Fig. 7) indicate that we do not see any increase of fluorescence for the blanks. All measured values show a fluctuation around 0. The graph of the functional aptamer with malachite green and T7 polymerase shows an increase of fluorescence over time. We were able to record a classical enzyme kinetic curve of a polymerase using the malachite green system (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, to confirm our data and to show, that the transcription efficiency is not hampered by the malachite green dye, we performed denaturing acrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 7C). The gel shows similar band intensities in presence as well as in absence of the dye if T7 polymerase was added to the reaction. Thus malachite green does not influence our transcription efficiency.
in vitro Transcription recording the Nucleotide Consumption in Correlation to de novo RNA Synthesis
As we were able to establish a highly sensitive fluorescent read out for ATP concentrations as well as for the RNA synthesis, we wanted to combine both methods. We performed in vitro transcription reactions in presence of the ATP AptamerJAWS1 Spinach2/DFHBI and Malachite Green Aptamer DNA template/malachite green dye. Fluorescence was measured in regular intervals. During the reaction we were able to sense the decrease of ATP AptamerJAWS1 Spinach2 fluorescence and an increase of the fluorescence corresponding to the Malachite Green Aptamer (Fig. 8). The results show that the transcription reaction reaches its maximum after 140 min.
In further studies, we added heparin to the in vitro transcription which is known to be a potent inhibitor of the T7 RNA polymerase
High Throughput Buffer Test under Low Input Conditions
For the buffer screen we applied six different buffer systems: Three transcription buffers pH 8.1 with different spermidine concentrations ranging from 0 mM to 10 mM, Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.1, HEPES buffer pH 7.5 (similar to the renaturing buffer) and a buffer including BSA pH 8.1. All buffers were analyzed using the same conditions as described in previous assays. As DNA template we applied the Malachite Green Aptamer with T7 promotor. Using our fluorescent read out system we can determine different transcription efficiencies. In presence of the HEPES buffer no increase of the Malachite Green Aptamer fluorescence signal was monitored (Fig. 10A). Furthermore the signal of the ATP Aptamer Spinach2 stays also at the same level as the blank. The BSA buffer and the Tris-HCl buffer (Fig. 10B) show a decrease of Spinach2 fluorescence and an increase of the Malachite Green Aptamer signal. The transcription buffer (1 mM and 10 mM) shows the highest slope of Malachite Green Aptamer fluorescence and the fastest decrease of the ATP Aptamer Spinach2 fluorescence (Fig. 10C). Thus we can detect huge differences in the transcription by applying our Spinach/Malachite Green set up. In addition we tested DNA template “substrate of RNA-cleaving DNAzyme”, which was difficult to transcribe (Fig. 11). Using our fluorescent tool box we can demonstrate again that substrate of RNA-cleaving DNAzyme causes problems during transcription. We can identify a slight decrease of Spinach fluorescence and increase in the Malachite Green signal. Thus this RNA yield of this transcription is low (Fig. 11A). As we were applying a DNA template containing a HHR in front of the Malachite Green Aptamer, we analyzed cleavage by denaturing acrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig 11B). We could identify the cleaved HHR-MGA RNA by high sensitive Sybr Gold staining.
Employing different Polymerases for Universal Setup Conditions
To overcome the dependence of the setup to apply a specific polymerase we designed new transcription templates containing different promoters for a subset of commercial available RNA polymerase such as T7 Phi 2.5, T3, Sp6 and E. coli (T7A1) (Fig. 12A). All polymerases have been tested for 12 hours at 37 °C and were measured in regular time intervals using TECAN Safire. The results show that the decrease of ATP AptamerJWAS1 Spinach2 activity is connected to the speed of the RNA polymerase. The data indicates that the reduction of ATP goes faster for T7 and T7Phi 2.5 than for the other candidates (Fig. 12B). Therefore the fluorescence of ATP AptamerJAWS1 Spinach2 decreases. The T3 polymerase is a little bit slower than the T7 RNA polymerase and does not reach the same bottom point. Nevertheless the graph decreases still over time and the polymerase seem to be active even after 500 min of the reaction. The Sp6 shows activity as well. The Sp6 leads to higher Malachite Green Aptamer production by using less ATP or leading to more functional RNA, while the T3 has a lower ATP Aptamer Spinach2 activity than Malachite Green Aptamer.
Establishment of Titration Curves for Quantification of the in vitro Transcription
The quantification of fluorescence is necessary to estimate the total amount of RNA synthetized in the in vitro transcription. For this purpose we transcribed the Malachite Green Aptamer and purified it by denaturing PAGE. Finally Malachite Green Aptamer RNA was titrated to different concentrations (10 µM, 7.5 µM, 5 µM, 2.5 µM, 1 µM, 0.5 µM and 0 µM of RNA) and the fluorescence determined using a multiwell-plate reader in presence of the dye and all other transcription components (Fig. 13). We were able to obtain a calibration curve (Fig. 13A) with a correlation coefficient of 0.99 which enables us to calculate the final RNA yields of different in vitro transcription reactions (Fig. 13B). As an example we calculated the RNA amount of the different transcriptions in presence of different DNA template concentrations. As expected best RNA yields were determined in presence of the highest DNA template concentration.