Difference between revisions of "Team:Kent/Basic Part"
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
<p><i>(<b>Figure 2.</b> Illustrates the construction of our plasmid, containing pSBIC3 and Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub>. The image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)</i> </p> | <p><i>(<b>Figure 2.</b> Illustrates the construction of our plasmid, containing pSBIC3 and Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub>. The image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)</i> </p> | ||
− | <p> This part uses the BBa_J23104 and encodes Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> in a pSB1C3 backbone. This part has been validated by digestion and quantification of the presence of the cytochrome gene on a diagnostic gel. Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> is a single subunit, four-helix bundle protein containing a non-covalently bound b-type haem group with a molecular weight of 25kDa | + | <p> This part uses the BBa_J23104 and encodes Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> in a pSB1C3 backbone. This part has been validated by digestion and quantification of the presence of the cytochrome gene on a diagnostic gel. Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> is a single subunit, four-helix bundle protein containing a non-covalently bound b-type haem group with a molecular weight of 25kDa <sup><a href="#r1">[1]</a></sup><sup><a href="#r2">[2]</a></sup>.</p> |
<!----<h3> Validation </h3>-----> | <!----<h3> Validation </h3>-----> | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
<p><i>(<b>Figure 3.</b> Illustrates the construction of our plasmid containing pSBIC3 and Sup35 with an N-terminal CsgAss signal sequence. The image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)</i></p> | <p><i>(<b>Figure 3.</b> Illustrates the construction of our plasmid containing pSBIC3 and Sup35 with an N-terminal CsgAss signal sequence. The image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)</i></p> | ||
− | <p> This part uses the BBa_J23104 and has been inserted into the pSB1C3 backbone. The design includes the bipartite csgA signal sequence that targets the protein to the Sec-export pathway and subsequently to the curli export pathway via interaction with csgG | + | <p> This part uses the BBa_J23104 and has been inserted into the pSB1C3 backbone. The design includes the bipartite csgA signal sequence that targets the protein to the Sec-export pathway and subsequently to the curli export pathway via interaction with csgG <sup><a href="#r6">[6]</a><sup><a href="#r7">[7]</a></sup></sup>. Sup35-NM is derived from the yeast prion protein Sup35p and excludes the C-terminal domain with the N-terminal domain allowing self-assembly of functional amyloid <sup><a href="#r3">[3]</a></sup><sup><a href="#r4">[4]</a></sup>. This has previously been discussed by Tessier and Lindquist (2009)<sup><a href="#r8">[8]</a></sup> who show that two beta-sheets bond together in a self-complimenting ‘steric zipper’ that excludes water, leaving a highly stable parallel beta-sheet with one molecule every 4.7 Angstroms. The particular advantage of using Sup35-NM is that in its native state Sup35p has two functional domains, the N and C terminal, separated by the highly charged M domain <sup><a href="#r3">[3]</a></sup><sup><a href="#r4">[4]</a></sup><sup><a href="#r9">[9]</a></sup> allowing the fusion of a new functional domain. </p> |
<!----<h3> Validation </h3> | <!----<h3> Validation </h3> | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
<p><i>(<b>Figure 5. </b> Illustrates the construction of our Envirowire plasmid containing pSBIC3 and Sup35 with an N-terminal CsgAss signal sequence and a C-terminal Cytochrome b<sub>562</sub>. This image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)</i></p> | <p><i>(<b>Figure 5. </b> Illustrates the construction of our Envirowire plasmid containing pSBIC3 and Sup35 with an N-terminal CsgAss signal sequence and a C-terminal Cytochrome b<sub>562</sub>. This image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)</i></p> | ||
− | <p> This BioBrick contains the constitutive promoter BBa_J23104 and uses the pSB1C3 backbone. It consists of three genes, a csgA signal sequence, Sup35-NM, and Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub>. The bipartite csgA signal sequence targets the Sec protein export pathway followed by the endogenous curli export system of E.coli allowing our protein to be easily exported into an external medium | + | <p> This BioBrick contains the constitutive promoter BBa_J23104 and uses the pSB1C3 backbone. It consists of three genes, a csgA signal sequence, Sup35-NM, and Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub>. The bipartite csgA signal sequence targets the Sec protein export pathway followed by the endogenous curli export system of E.coli allowing our protein to be easily exported into an external medium <sup><a href="#r6">[6]</a></sup><sup><a href="#r7">[7]</a></sup>. Sup35-NM is derived from the yeast prion protein Sup35p and excludes the C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain allows self-assembly of functional amyloid <sup><a href="#r3">[3]</a></sup><sup><a href="#r4">[4]</a></sup>. This has previously been discussed by Tessier and Lindquist (2009)<sup><a href="#r8">[8]</a></sup> who show that two beta-sheets bond together in a self-complimenting ‘steric zipper’ that excludes water, leaving a highly stable parallel beta-sheet with one molecule every 4.7Å. The particular advantage of using Sup35-NM is that in its native state Sup35p has two functional domains, the N and C terminal, separated by the highly charged M domain <sup><a href="#r3">[3]</a></sup><sup><a href="#r4">[4]</a></sup><sup><a href="#r9">[9]</a></sup>. Thus facilitating the removal of one functional domain in order to add our own functional protein, in this case Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> to form a fusion protein. </p> |
− | <p>We chose Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> as the electron carrier to make our amyloid conductive. The structure of Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> consists of a single 24kDa subunit containing four nearly parallel alpha helices | + | <p>We chose Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> as the electron carrier to make our amyloid conductive. The structure of Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> consists of a single 24kDa subunit containing four nearly parallel alpha helices <sup><a href="#r1">[1]</a></sup><sup><a href="#r5">[5]</a></sup>. B-type cytochromes are a favourable choice because haem binds in a non-ionic fashion to the two ligands Methionine-7 and Histidine-106 (Xavier et al., 1978). Haem binding has been shown to occur in both the native protein and the denatured protein, although the latter exhibits a modest affinity with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 3μM. This allows the cytochrome to be exported in an unfolded state and haem to be added exogenously to initiate correct folding of the cytochrome by burying hydrophobic side chains <sup><a href="#r2">[2]</a></sup>. Furthermore, haem binding to Cytochrome <i>b</i><sub>562</sub> has a high affinity interaction with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 9nM at 25°C <sup><a href="#r2">[2]</a></sup>). This BioBrick has been optimised for use in the VS45 strain of E.coli containing deletions that prevent amyloid from binding to the outside of the cell and increase the rate of protein exiting the cell via the curli export system. </p> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<!------<h3> Validation </h3> | <!------<h3> Validation </h3> | ||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
<!---<p><i>(<b>Figure 6.</b> Shows the conductivity testing of the biofilm on the haem plates.) </i></p>-----> | <!---<p><i>(<b>Figure 6.</b> Shows the conductivity testing of the biofilm on the haem plates.) </i></p>-----> | ||
− | <!----<p>The third method of validation for protein export and amyloid formation was achieved by atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging to provide a topography of our samples. Using the aforementioned E.coli strains a, 5 day incubation at 25°C was carried out to make sure that the amyloid fibres were stable for the AFM protocol, as suggested by Sivanathan and Hochschild (2012). The resulting images clearly showed the presence of amyloid fibres in the VS45 sample with PVS72 and no amyloid fibres in the VS45 with PVS105 sample.</p>-----> | + | <!----<p>The third method of validation for protein export and amyloid formation was achieved by atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging to provide a topography of our samples. Using the aforementioned E.coli strains a, 5 day incubation at 25°C was carried out to make sure that the amyloid fibres were stable for the AFM protocol, as suggested by Sivanathan and Hochschild (2012)<sup><a href="#r6">[6]</a></sup>. The resulting images clearly showed the presence of amyloid fibres in the VS45 sample with PVS72 and no amyloid fibres in the VS45 with PVS105 sample.</p>-----> |
<!---AFM image---> | <!---AFM image---> | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
<a class="anchor" id="top" name="ref"></a> <h2 align="left"> References </h2> | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="ref"></a> <h2 align="left"> References </h2> | ||
<p align="justify"> | <p align="justify"> | ||
− | Fujiwara, T., Fnkumori,, Y. and Yamanaka, T. (1993). Halobacterium halobium Cytochrome b-558 and Cytochrome b-562: Purification and Some Properties. J. Biochem., 113, pp.48-54. | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r1"> </a> [1] Fujiwara, T., Fnkumori,, Y. and Yamanaka, T. (1993). Halobacterium halobium Cytochrome b-558 and Cytochrome b-562: Purification and Some Properties. J. Biochem., 113, pp.48-54. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | Robinson, C., Liu, Y., Thomson, J., Sturtevant, J. and Sligar, S. (1997). Energetics of Heme Binding to Native and Denatured States of Cytochrome b 562 †. Biochemistry, 36(51), pp.16141-16146. | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r2"> </a> [2]Robinson, C., Liu, Y., Thomson, J., Sturtevant, J. and Sligar, S. (1997). Energetics of Heme Binding to Native and Denatured States of Cytochrome b 562 †. Biochemistry, 36(51), pp.16141-16146. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | Frederick, K., Debelouchina, G., Kayatekin, C., Dorminy, T., Jacavone, A., Griffin, R. and Lindquist, S. (2014). Distinct Prion Strains Are Defined by Amyloid Core Structure and Chaperone Binding Site Dynamics. Chemistry & Biology, 21(2), pp.295-305. | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r3"> </a> [3] Frederick, K., Debelouchina, G., Kayatekin, C., Dorminy, T., Jacavone, A., Griffin, R. and Lindquist, S. (2014). Distinct Prion Strains Are Defined by Amyloid Core Structure and Chaperone Binding Site Dynamics. Chemistry & Biology, 21(2), pp.295-305. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | Glover, J., Kowal, A., Schirmer, E., Patino, M., Liu, J. and Lindquist, S. (1997). Self-Seeded Fibers Formed by Sup35, the Protein Determinant of [PSI+], a Heritable Prion-like Factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell, 89(5), pp.811-819. | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r4"> </a> [4] Glover, J., Kowal, A., Schirmer, E., Patino, M., Liu, J. and Lindquist, S. (1997). Self-Seeded Fibers Formed by Sup35, the Protein Determinant of [PSI+], a Heritable Prion-like Factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell, 89(5), pp.811-819. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | Mathews, F. S., Bethge, P. H., & Czerwinski, E. W. (1979). The structure of cytochrome b562 from Escherichia coli at 2.5 A resolution. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 254(5), 1699-1706. | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r5"> </a> [5] Mathews, F. S., Bethge, P. H., & Czerwinski, E. W. (1979). The structure of cytochrome b562 from Escherichia coli at 2.5 A resolution. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 254(5), 1699-1706. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | Sivanathan, V. and Hochschild, A. (2012). Generating extracellular amyloid aggregates using E. coli cells. Genes & Development, 26(23), pp.2659-2667 | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r6"> </a> [6] Sivanathan, V. and Hochschild, A. (2012). Generating extracellular amyloid aggregates using E. coli cells. Genes & Development, 26(23), pp.2659-2667 |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | Sivanathan, V. and Hochschild, A. (2013). A bacterial export system for generating extracellular amyloid aggregates. Nat Protoc, 8(7), pp.1381-1390. | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r7"> </a> [7] Sivanathan, V. and Hochschild, A. (2013). A bacterial export system for generating extracellular amyloid aggregates. Nat Protoc, 8(7), pp.1381-1390. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | Tessier, P. and Lindquist, S. (2009). Unraveling infectious structures, strain variants and species barriers for the yeast prion [PSI+]. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 16(6), pp.598-605. | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r8"> </a> [8]Tessier, P. and Lindquist, S. (2009). Unraveling infectious structures, strain variants and species barriers for the yeast prion [PSI+]. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 16(6), pp.598-605. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | Wickner, R., Edskes, H., Shewmaker, F. and Nakayashiki, T. (2007). Prions of fungi: inherited structures and biological roles. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(8), pp.611-618. | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r9"> </a> [9] Wickner, R., Edskes, H., Shewmaker, F. and Nakayashiki, T. (2007). Prions of fungi: inherited structures and biological roles. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(8), pp.611-618. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
− | Xavier, A., Czerwinski, E., Bethge, P. and Mathews, F. (1978). Identification of the haem ligands of cytochrome b562 by X-ray and NMR methods. Nature, 275(5677), pp.245-247. | + | <a class="anchor" id="top" name="r10"> </a> [10]Xavier, A., Czerwinski, E., Bethge, P. and Mathews, F. (1978). Identification of the haem ligands of cytochrome b562 by X-ray and NMR methods. Nature, 275(5677), pp.245-247. |
Revision as of 18:47, 18 September 2015
Basic Parts
Sup35NM
Part name: BBa_K1739000
(Figure 1. Illustrates the construction of our plasmid containing pSBIC3 and Sup35NM. The image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)
We have improved a previously designed BioBrick (Part:BBa_K401001) from the 2010 Valencia iGEM team that encoded the Sup35 protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The previously designed BioBrick contained two illegal cut sites for Pstl and one for Bsal within the coding region that reduce compatibility for digestion and modification of the part. Our improved BioBrick has used genome optimisation in order to remove these cut sites, producing a part compatible with the iGEM part submission standards.
Cytochrome b562
Part name: BBa_K1739001
(Figure 2. Illustrates the construction of our plasmid, containing pSBIC3 and Cytochrome b562. The image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)
This part uses the BBa_J23104 and encodes Cytochrome b562 in a pSB1C3 backbone. This part has been validated by digestion and quantification of the presence of the cytochrome gene on a diagnostic gel. Cytochrome b562 is a single subunit, four-helix bundle protein containing a non-covalently bound b-type haem group with a molecular weight of 25kDa [1][2].
Sup35NM with N-terminal CsgAss signal sequence
Part name: BBa_K1739002
(Figure 3. Illustrates the construction of our plasmid containing pSBIC3 and Sup35 with an N-terminal CsgAss signal sequence. The image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)
This part uses the BBa_J23104 and has been inserted into the pSB1C3 backbone. The design includes the bipartite csgA signal sequence that targets the protein to the Sec-export pathway and subsequently to the curli export pathway via interaction with csgG [6][7]. Sup35-NM is derived from the yeast prion protein Sup35p and excludes the C-terminal domain with the N-terminal domain allowing self-assembly of functional amyloid [3][4]. This has previously been discussed by Tessier and Lindquist (2009)[8] who show that two beta-sheets bond together in a self-complimenting ‘steric zipper’ that excludes water, leaving a highly stable parallel beta-sheet with one molecule every 4.7 Angstroms. The particular advantage of using Sup35-NM is that in its native state Sup35p has two functional domains, the N and C terminal, separated by the highly charged M domain [3][4][9] allowing the fusion of a new functional domain.
Envirowire: Sup35NM with an N-terminal CsgAss signal sequence and a C-terminal Cytochrome b562
Part name: BBa_K1739003
(Figure 5. Illustrates the construction of our Envirowire plasmid containing pSBIC3 and Sup35 with an N-terminal CsgAss signal sequence and a C-terminal Cytochrome b562. This image was created using SnapGene Viewer.)
This BioBrick contains the constitutive promoter BBa_J23104 and uses the pSB1C3 backbone. It consists of three genes, a csgA signal sequence, Sup35-NM, and Cytochrome b562. The bipartite csgA signal sequence targets the Sec protein export pathway followed by the endogenous curli export system of E.coli allowing our protein to be easily exported into an external medium [6][7]. Sup35-NM is derived from the yeast prion protein Sup35p and excludes the C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain allows self-assembly of functional amyloid [3][4]. This has previously been discussed by Tessier and Lindquist (2009)[8] who show that two beta-sheets bond together in a self-complimenting ‘steric zipper’ that excludes water, leaving a highly stable parallel beta-sheet with one molecule every 4.7Å. The particular advantage of using Sup35-NM is that in its native state Sup35p has two functional domains, the N and C terminal, separated by the highly charged M domain [3][4][9]. Thus facilitating the removal of one functional domain in order to add our own functional protein, in this case Cytochrome b562 to form a fusion protein.
We chose Cytochrome b562 as the electron carrier to make our amyloid conductive. The structure of Cytochrome b562 consists of a single 24kDa subunit containing four nearly parallel alpha helices [1][5]. B-type cytochromes are a favourable choice because haem binds in a non-ionic fashion to the two ligands Methionine-7 and Histidine-106 (Xavier et al., 1978). Haem binding has been shown to occur in both the native protein and the denatured protein, although the latter exhibits a modest affinity with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 3μM. This allows the cytochrome to be exported in an unfolded state and haem to be added exogenously to initiate correct folding of the cytochrome by burying hydrophobic side chains [2]. Furthermore, haem binding to Cytochrome b562 has a high affinity interaction with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 9nM at 25°C [2]). This BioBrick has been optimised for use in the VS45 strain of E.coli containing deletions that prevent amyloid from binding to the outside of the cell and increase the rate of protein exiting the cell via the curli export system.
References
[1] Fujiwara, T., Fnkumori,, Y. and Yamanaka, T. (1993). Halobacterium halobium Cytochrome b-558 and Cytochrome b-562: Purification and Some Properties. J. Biochem., 113, pp.48-54.
[2]Robinson, C., Liu, Y., Thomson, J., Sturtevant, J. and Sligar, S. (1997). Energetics of Heme Binding to Native and Denatured States of Cytochrome b 562 †. Biochemistry, 36(51), pp.16141-16146.
[3] Frederick, K., Debelouchina, G., Kayatekin, C., Dorminy, T., Jacavone, A., Griffin, R. and Lindquist, S. (2014). Distinct Prion Strains Are Defined by Amyloid Core Structure and Chaperone Binding Site Dynamics. Chemistry & Biology, 21(2), pp.295-305.
[4] Glover, J., Kowal, A., Schirmer, E., Patino, M., Liu, J. and Lindquist, S. (1997). Self-Seeded Fibers Formed by Sup35, the Protein Determinant of [PSI+], a Heritable Prion-like Factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell, 89(5), pp.811-819.
[5] Mathews, F. S., Bethge, P. H., & Czerwinski, E. W. (1979). The structure of cytochrome b562 from Escherichia coli at 2.5 A resolution. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 254(5), 1699-1706.
[6] Sivanathan, V. and Hochschild, A. (2012). Generating extracellular amyloid aggregates using E. coli cells. Genes & Development, 26(23), pp.2659-2667
[7] Sivanathan, V. and Hochschild, A. (2013). A bacterial export system for generating extracellular amyloid aggregates. Nat Protoc, 8(7), pp.1381-1390.
[8]Tessier, P. and Lindquist, S. (2009). Unraveling infectious structures, strain variants and species barriers for the yeast prion [PSI+]. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 16(6), pp.598-605.
[9] Wickner, R., Edskes, H., Shewmaker, F. and Nakayashiki, T. (2007). Prions of fungi: inherited structures and biological roles. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(8), pp.611-618.
[10]Xavier, A., Czerwinski, E., Bethge, P. and Mathews, F. (1978). Identification of the haem ligands of cytochrome b562 by X-ray and NMR methods. Nature, 275(5677), pp.245-247.