_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cloning
Our original full construct containing Lpp_OmpA and Zif268 were cloned successfully into the pSB1C3 plasmid and transformed into chemically competent DH5α-Z1. Then we cloned INP, BclA, and sZFs 2,10 & 14 individually into our construct gene, using the restriction sites we included in the design. Results were confirmed by sequencing colonies picked from antibiotic selection plates.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Experiment 1: Testing the binding of specifically designed DNA strands to glass slides
We showed that we could bind aminated DNA to slides using a fluorescein-labelled oligonucleotide. Two slides were used: a GOPTS-treated slide that should bind aminated DNA, and a control slide that was cleaned like the GOPTS slide, but was not treated with the GOPTS solution, and should not bind DNA (aminated or otherwise). Our experiment showed fluorescence only on the treated slide, showing that our DNA-immobilisation technique was valid.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Experiment 2: Testing the expression of zinc finger proteins on the surface of E. coli cells upon induction with IPTG
Our objective was to prove that the modified protein was being expressed on the surface of the plasmid transformed cells.
Zif268
- A: Wild type DH5α-Z1 E. coli cells
- B: Uninduced Lpp_OmpA-Zif268 transformed cells
- C: Induced Lpp_OmpA-Zif268 transformed cells
Upon comparison of image B and C,it is clear that the modified protein is being expressed upon induction with IPTG. However, the wild type cell shows fluorescence as well, suggesting that there is an error with our method of washing the cells after the fluorescent antibodies have been applied. The affected cells would fluoresce regardless of surface zinc finger expression.
sZF2
- A: Wild type DH5α-Z1 E. coli cells
- B: Uninduced Lpp_OmpA-sZF2 transformed cells
- C: Induced Lpp_OmpA-sZF2 transformed cells
Images A and B show no fluorescence, other than what looks like a clothing fibre falling on the slide, however image C only shows very little fluorescence. This suggests that very few of our cells were expressing the protein. This could be due to incorrect growing or mounting of the cells.
sZF10
- A: Wild type DH5α-Z1 E. coli cells
- B: Uninduced Lpp_OmpA-sZF10 transformed cells
- C: Induced Lpp_OmpA-sZF10 transformed cells
From the images, no fluorescence was detected on any of the slides. This could be caused by the protein not being expressed on the surface of the cell. A random mutation in the colony that these cells were grown from could be the cause. While this plasmid was sequenced successfully, the colony that these cells originate from came from a replating of the original successful colony.
sZF14
- A: Wild type DH5α-Z1 E. coli cells
- B: Uninduced Lpp_OmpA-sZF14 transformed cells
- C: Induced Lpp_OmpA-sZF14 transformed cells
These induced cells are the most clearly fluorescent from the set that was measured. Based on the previous results we decided to alter the protocol for preparing cells for microscopy, instead of fixing the cells on a glass slide, these cells were in liquid medium on the slide. The alternative protocol can be found here. By comparing images A and C it is clear that the fluorescence is caused by the protein being expressed on the cell surface. Image B shows that the Pl_lac promoter did not leak and cause uninduced cells to express the protein in great enough numbers to be visible.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Experiment 3: Reciprocal experiment - binding of fluorescently labelled oligonucleotides to immobilised cells
This experiment was conducted with all the zinc fingers, however all but