Difference between revisions of "Team:Nankai/Practices"

Human Practice: An Amazing Summer！！

As Peter Carr puts it, "Human Practices is the study of how your work affects the world, and how the world affects your work." This summer, Nankai iGEM team worked our best to put the spirits of collaboration and sharing into practice. Not only have we attended many important activities and conferences, but also a new information-sharing platform— iShare has become reality. Let’s see what our team did in this amazing summer.

2. iShare Survey

TBefore a functional platform could be established, we surveyed its popularity among iGEM teams this year. Questionnaires were sent to 281 iGEM teams separately and 82 of them were filled and retrieved. Statistics and analysis of the questions are as following.

Most of those teams were undergraduate teams (76.14%), some were graduate teams (20.45%) and two were high school teams (2.27%).

Q1. Which section is your team in?

Also most teams surveyed were from Asia (53.41%), some were from North America (21.59%) and Europe (18.18%), 5 teams were from South America (5.68%) and one team from Africa (1.14%).

As we explained, “ishare” wants promotes communication and material sharing between iGEM teams. However interactions between teams are greatly limited by the distances of teams. It’s easier for us to reach those teams that are close to us, teams in Asia, but it’s pretty clear that we still need help in organizing real material sharing events on anther continental.

Q2. Which region is your team in?

Among those teams interviewed, 77% of them had difficulty finding experimental materials related to their projects and about 53% of those troubled teams said their project was greatly delayed due to the lack of materials.

It’s usually very difficult for a new team to start on their project. We experienced this inconvenience last summer and that was where the idea of “ishare” came from. Information on wiki could sometimes be too overwhelming, and most of the time we never know how to contact a team by just reviewing their wiki. Therefore it would be great if “ishare” can provide a chance for two-way communication as, a supplement for team wiki. Teams who join “ishare” could put project description and e-mails on it, so that teams with similar interest could find and help each other.

Q3. Have you met any difficulties in finding experimental material related to your project?

In the meantime, 34.09% of teams found it difficult to repeat or improve previous iGEM projects, 56.82% of teams thought it was hard to say and only the 6% of the teams said it would be easy to do so.

iGEM has already established a functional platform of biobricks on registry, and iGEM teams are recommended to use and improve those parts. However information related to those biobricks is often ignored on registry, such as information about bacteria strains, antibodies, enzymes and so on. How can another team acquire certain bacteria strain, when the biobrick is better expressed in this strain than it is in E.coli? Can other teams get this strain directly from the original team, or is it possible that they obtain it from a third party? If those information could be well collected and presented on the platform, independently or as a supplement for registry, “ishare” would be of great help for teams to repeat and improve previous projects, independently or as a supplement for registry.

Q4. How difficult do you think it would be to repeat or improve previous iGEM projects?

Like we expected, 84.09% of the teams agreed that a resource sharing platform like "ishare" would help on solving the problems above.

Q5. Would a resource sharing platform help in improving previous iGEM project?

And 84.09% of the teams would like to join “ishare”.

Q6. Would you like to be part of iShare?

In addition, we questioned about team’s preference about sharing materials. 78.41% of the teams would like to share bacterial strains, 57.95% of them would like to share cells strains, 67.05% of them would share enzymes, 55.68% of them would share antibodies, 80.68% of them would share plasmids and another 21.59% would share other materials.

Showed in the histogram below, teams were generous about real materials they would offer. In the meantime the actual process of sharing the material for instance shipment of bacterial strains may still be troublesome. However it won’t remain as a problem for long, as long as teams are truly involved in “ishare”. There could dozens of solutions between different teams, and in the future, a wider list of material’s information would be presented on “ishare”.

Q7. What kind of material do you expect to get or share on iShare?

Now "ishare" is fully functional and 4 iGEM teams have already provided information of materials related to their project on the platform. We want to show iGEM HQ that this is a trouble solving idea. We hope in the future "ishare" could be presented on the upstream of wiki server and be put into actual use.

If you want to participate in the survey, Click here.

3. Collaborations and Conferences

Communication means improvement and achievement of Double-win. For example, Tianjin University is not only our neighbor but also our good collaborator on experiment and human practice. What’s more, during summer vacation, Nankai, ZJU and SYSU iGEM teams also meet together to exchange ideas.

Nankai University & Tianjian University

Until now, we have built up the collaboration with TJU, ZJU and SYSU. In the near future, we will further communicate with more universities and build up collaborations. We have the same wish for a better team! Let’s communicate and collaborate!

Meeting in Zhejiang Province: Nankai, ZJU, SYSU

What’s more, we also participate many kinds of conferences, such as The 3rd SYMPOSIUM OF BOHAI-RIM MICROBIOLOGY and Peking CCiC.

Through the conferences, not only can we get precious ideas from experts and other teams but also broaden our horizons on synthetic biology. It means a lot to our teams’ improvement.