Difference between revisions of "Team:Penn/Sender"

Line 102: Line 102:
  
  
     <p class="margin-top-10">Lux operon expression is responsible for bioluminescence. The operon is initiated by a constitutive promoter (BBa_J23100) followed by an RBS + lux box. The box contains the following: LuxC, D, A, B, E and G. LuxA and B encode two subunits of bacterial luciferase. The genes LuxC, D, and E drive expression of the substrate for the light-emitting reaction, tetradecanal. The function of the luxG gene is yet to be fully elucidated; however, inclusion of the gene is known to increase light output (CITATION). The circuit is completed with a stop codon and a terminator sequence.</p>
+
     <p class="margin-top-10">Lux operon expression is responsible for bioluminescence. The operon is initiated by a constitutive promoter (BBa_J23100) followed by an RBS + lux box. The box contains the following: LuxC, D, A, B, E and G. LuxA and B encode two subunits of bacterial luciferase. The genes LuxC, D, and E drive expression of the substrate for the light-emitting reaction, tetradecanal. The function of the luxG gene is yet to be fully elucidated; however, inclusion of the gene is known to increase light output (Craney et al. 2007)). The circuit is completed with a stop codon and a terminator sequence.</p>
  
 
<table align = "center">
 
<table align = "center">
Line 115: Line 115:
  
 
<p class="margin-top-10">We also tested the light output of a "split-lux" system to decrease the genetic payload controlled by a single promoter. Gene expression of lux AB was placed under control of the sulA inducible promoter, and lux CDE expression was placed under a constitutive promoter (CP25/CP38). Further characterization involved adding substrate externally to the reaction and concentrating cell samples to increase light output. The project plan is illustrated in the flow diagram below</p>
 
<p class="margin-top-10">We also tested the light output of a "split-lux" system to decrease the genetic payload controlled by a single promoter. Gene expression of lux AB was placed under control of the sulA inducible promoter, and lux CDE expression was placed under a constitutive promoter (CP25/CP38). Further characterization involved adding substrate externally to the reaction and concentrating cell samples to increase light output. The project plan is illustrated in the flow diagram below</p>
 +
 +
<p class="margin-top-10"><br><b></b> </p>
 +
 +
<table align = "center">
 +
<tr>
 +
<td><img id = "daicon" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/2a/HNS_shows_greater_stustained_luminesence.png"></a></td>
 +
</table>
 +
  
 
<p class="margin-top-10"><br><b>DERIVATION OF PHOTONS/SEC FROM RELATIVE LIGHT UNITS (RLUs)</b> </p>
 
<p class="margin-top-10"><br><b>DERIVATION OF PHOTONS/SEC FROM RELATIVE LIGHT UNITS (RLUs)</b> </p>

Revision as of 22:02, 18 September 2015

University of Pennsylvania iGEM

PENN iGEM 2015



SENDER


IS THE LIGHT PRODUCED BY THE SENDER CELL SUFFICIENT TO ACTIVATE THE RECEIVER CELL?


INTRODUCTION

An effective light-based communication system rests on the bioluminesence generated by the “sender cell.” In order to design a well-functioning system, the Penn 2015 iGEM team worked to optimize the light output of various E.coli “sender cells” transformed with the lux operon (BBa_K325909).

Lux operon expression is responsible for bioluminescence. The operon is initiated by a constitutive promoter (BBa_J23100) followed by an RBS + lux box. The box contains the following: LuxC, D, A, B, E and G. LuxA and B encode two subunits of bacterial luciferase. The genes LuxC, D, and E drive expression of the substrate for the light-emitting reaction, tetradecanal. The function of the luxG gene is yet to be fully elucidated; however, inclusion of the gene is known to increase light output (Craney et al. 2007)). The circuit is completed with a stop codon and a terminator sequence.

Our sender cell characterization was founded on determining the photons/second trends for luminescing cell populations. This information was important in order to determine if light produced by the lux box is sufficient to activate the light-activated transcription factor of the receiver cell population.

Following this, we measured luminescence output in different strains (BL21, NEB10 and HNS BW25113 Dhns::kan strain). We wanted to see which strain would drive the most sustained luminescence output at the highest photon/second value.

We also tested the light output of a "split-lux" system to decrease the genetic payload controlled by a single promoter. Gene expression of lux AB was placed under control of the sulA inducible promoter, and lux CDE expression was placed under a constitutive promoter (CP25/CP38). Further characterization involved adding substrate externally to the reaction and concentrating cell samples to increase light output. The project plan is illustrated in the flow diagram below



DERIVATION OF PHOTONS/SEC FROM RELATIVE LIGHT UNITS (RLUs)

Our team used a Tecan M200 in order to measure luminescence output of our cell cultures. The instrument provides the luminescence in relative light units. We worked to convert this to an absolute measurement, which would allow us to compare our luminescence output to pDawn (our receiver plasmid) activation thresholds described in literature.

The below graphs demonstrate the derivation of our conversion. The first graph relates RLUs to luminometer measurements. A luminometer is "an instrument used to measures light and other optical properties of specimens in chemiluminescent and bioluminescent applications." Following this, the second graph relates the luminometer measurements to power meter readings. The luminometer is used as an intermediate because the low intensities of the cell cultures are below the detection threshold of the power meter.