Difference between revisions of "Team:UFMG Brazil/Public Engagement"

Education and Public Engagement

(4) Talking to the society

The distance between the academia and the society, beyond restrict the demands that are addressed by science and make them apart from the societal needs, also interferes in the public acceptance of the projects developed by science. This subject was covered by our team work in the Synenergene project, which is described here.

To evaluate the public reaction about Synthetic Biology and our project, since we have the objective of using attenuated pathogens as a disease treatment, and to also assess the concerns and fears of the population about this approach, the team conducted a survey at different points of Belo Horizonte.

Overview of interviewees

Among a total of 302 people interviewed, 52.8% were female, and 46.9% were male (Figure 1).

Figure 1 The majority of the people interviewed had between 12 and 40 years(Figure 2)

Figure 2 Figure 2: Age of the interviewees.

The majority of the people interviewed has middle school to undergraduate degree (Figure 3).

Figure3 Figure 3: Education level of the interviewees.

Public background and opinion

In the survey questions on people’s opinions about genetically modified organisms (GMOs), most respondents (75%) showed that they were familiar with the concept, but the majority is unsure about the benefits they can provide (25.7% thinks they are bad for society and 34.2% do not know what to respond). In some cases, the phrase "that's playing God" was mentioned (see Figures 4 to 10).

The two main mistrusts reported by the public were the possibility of something going wrong, leading to the creation of a more dangerous pathogen than the pre-existing one; and the lack of faith that the Leishmania strain is indeed apathogenic. Thus, further explanations were given about the specific proposal and about Synthetic Biology.

In some cases, an oppening to the idea was observed and people seemed more sympathetic to the project, leading to a detected 84.5% acceptance to the team’s proposal. The reactions detected in the survey’s results made the team realise that there is a lack of information and discussion about GMOs and Synthetic Biology between society and scientific community (see Figures 4 to 10).

Figure 4 Figure 4: Answer to the question “Have you ever heard about Leishmania?”

Figure 5 Figure 5. Answer to the question “Do you think Leishmania could be beneficial?””

Figure 6 Figure 6. Answer to the question “Have you ever heard about GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms)?”

Figure 7 Figure 7. Answer to the question “Do you believe GMOs to be beneficial or harmful for our society?”

Figure 8 Figure 8. Answer to the question “Would you accept using modified Leishmania as treatment for a disease?”

Figure 9 Figure 9. Answer to the question “Do you use probiotics, biological baking powder (yeast) or vaccines?”

Figure 11 Figure 11. Answer to the question “Do you believe GMOs to be beneficial or harmful for our society?”