Difference between revisions of "Team:Aachen/Design"
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
The huge advantage of our approach is that it addresses the problem in various ways. Not only can the potential of methanol as a carbon source be exploited but also the surplus CO{{sub|2}} in the atmosphere is utilized. Likewise, it has to be considered that by fixing the CO{{sub|2}} technically, non-arable areas like deserts can be used. In addition compared to the other approaches, our project is based on a CO{{sub|2}} fixing method that is far more efficient than plants. Finally, the production of glycogen from methanol with our bacteria is independent from the restricted arable land available. | The huge advantage of our approach is that it addresses the problem in various ways. Not only can the potential of methanol as a carbon source be exploited but also the surplus CO{{sub|2}} in the atmosphere is utilized. Likewise, it has to be considered that by fixing the CO{{sub|2}} technically, non-arable areas like deserts can be used. In addition compared to the other approaches, our project is based on a CO{{sub|2}} fixing method that is far more efficient than plants. Finally, the production of glycogen from methanol with our bacteria is independent from the restricted arable land available. | ||
+ | {{Team:Aachen/Figure|Aachen_BG11.jpg|title=cycle from CO{{sub|2}} to biotechnological product|subtitle=|size=large}} | ||
The most important impact of our project is, that arable land will no longer be used to supply the bioeconomy’s demand for a carbon source. It can again be used to plant food crops to feed a rapidly growing world population. | The most important impact of our project is, that arable land will no longer be used to supply the bioeconomy’s demand for a carbon source. It can again be used to plant food crops to feed a rapidly growing world population. |
Revision as of 02:10, 19 September 2015