Difference between revisions of "Team:Aalto-Helsinki/Modeling micelle"
m (text of lengths and constants) |
m |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<h1>Geometrical approach</h1> | <h1>Geometrical approach</h1> | ||
− | <p>The micelle is formed by amphiphilic proteins that have both hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts. At the end of hydrophilic part there is short protein, a linker that attaches CAR or ADO to the amphiphilic part. | + | <h2>Micelle structure</h2> |
+ | |||
+ | <p>The micelle is formed by amphiphilic proteins that have both hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts. At the end of hydrophilic part there is short protein, a linker that attaches CAR or ADO to the amphiphilic part.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>--picture of micelle somewhere near!--</p> | ||
<p>(Here where we got amphiphilic proteins sizes.) The <a>linker (here link for more info about this. Structure and such, does lab have that somewhere?)</a> consists of eight amino acids, for which the maximum lengths are 3,8Å. From this we can calculate that at most the length of one linker is 2,8 nm. If the linker would form $\alpha$-helical structure, then the length for one peptide would be about 1,5 Å so the one linker would be 1,2 nm long. (we need some source for the Å-lengths) However, we can estimate that the linkers are straight, since when running the structure in <a href="http://mobyle.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr">peptide structure prediction software</a> doesn't yield strong folding or helical structure. </p> | <p>(Here where we got amphiphilic proteins sizes.) The <a>linker (here link for more info about this. Structure and such, does lab have that somewhere?)</a> consists of eight amino acids, for which the maximum lengths are 3,8Å. From this we can calculate that at most the length of one linker is 2,8 nm. If the linker would form $\alpha$-helical structure, then the length for one peptide would be about 1,5 Å so the one linker would be 1,2 nm long. (we need some source for the Å-lengths) However, we can estimate that the linkers are straight, since when running the structure in <a href="http://mobyle.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr">peptide structure prediction software</a> doesn't yield strong folding or helical structure. </p> | ||
Line 28: | Line 32: | ||
<p>The mass of CAR is <a href = "http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/B2HN69">127 797 DA</a> and the mass of ADO is <a href="http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=4KVS">27 569.15 Da</a>. Based on this information and <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055910/">this paper</a> we can calculate that if the enzymes were spheres, their radiuses would be 3,5 nm for CAR and 2 nm for ADO. (do we need more info about these calculations here?)</p> | <p>The mass of CAR is <a href = "http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/B2HN69">127 797 DA</a> and the mass of ADO is <a href="http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=4KVS">27 569.15 Da</a>. Based on this information and <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055910/">this paper</a> we can calculate that if the enzymes were spheres, their radiuses would be 3,5 nm for CAR and 2 nm for ADO. (do we need more info about these calculations here?)</p> | ||
+ | <p>--picture of two amphiphilic proteins with ADO and CAR where all the above numbers are marked as well as total lengths--</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>Calculations</h2> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>We can estimate how many amphiphilic proteins we can theoretically fit in one micelle by calculating how big solid angles they take with attached enzymes. The easiest way to estimate the solid angles is to think the amphiphilic proteins linked with enzymes as cones. This way CAR-cone would take xx rad and ADO-cone yy rad.</p> | ||
<h1>Discussion</h1> | <h1>Discussion</h1> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Here text about how the results obtained show normal micelle sizes so the formation should be ok geometrically.</p> | ||
<p>Here text about how we didn't take into account any forces and how this model could be improved.</p> | <p>Here text about how we didn't take into account any forces and how this model could be improved.</p> |
Revision as of 09:06, 29 July 2015