Difference between revisions of "Team:Bordeaux/Practices"
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
<p align="justify"> • We worked with non-toxic organisms as <i> Escherichia coli </i>(BL21) and <i> Saccharomyces cerevisiae </i>(Invsc1) but, all waste that has been in contact with bacteria was put to bacterial waste in aseptic conditions. </p> | <p align="justify"> • We worked with non-toxic organisms as <i> Escherichia coli </i>(BL21) and <i> Saccharomyces cerevisiae </i>(Invsc1) but, all waste that has been in contact with bacteria was put to bacterial waste in aseptic conditions. </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <p align="justify"> | + | <p align="justify"> <h6> On another hand </h6>, our project intends to use a polysaccharide which is synthetically produced by our genetically modified organisms but it already exists in nature. This molecule is naturally present in yeast’s wall, and doesn’t have a bad known impact on the environment. Compared to copper sulfate which is a toxic compound this molecule seems to be more eco-friendly. Indeed, this metal isn’t biodegradable; used many times to treat Downy Mildew, it is accumulated on the soil and the vineyards are polluted. For worms and micro-organisms living in vineyards soils, this compound is toxic, so it alters the biosphere. The hydric and air erosion contribute to the diffusion of copper in the transfer of pollution. </p> |
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 11:31, 29 July 2015