Difference between revisions of "Team:Bordeaux/Problem"
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
<p align="justify" style="text-indent: 3vw;"> Since repairing damaged tissues infected by downy mildew is impossible, the main solutions available to vinyards are preventive solutions, mainly through preventing primary infections. This is mainly done by spraying fungicides on the organs that are most infected: leaves and stems. The most efficient preventive treatment was discovered at the end of the 19th century: a solution made of copper sulfate also known as "Bouillie Bordelaise", the only treatment used until the end of the 20th century. Recently, synthetic fungicides have replaced this chemical treatment and more and more research is being done on alternative eco-friendly preventive treatments. </p> | <p align="justify" style="text-indent: 3vw;"> Since repairing damaged tissues infected by downy mildew is impossible, the main solutions available to vinyards are preventive solutions, mainly through preventing primary infections. This is mainly done by spraying fungicides on the organs that are most infected: leaves and stems. The most efficient preventive treatment was discovered at the end of the 19th century: a solution made of copper sulfate also known as "Bouillie Bordelaise", the only treatment used until the end of the 20th century. Recently, synthetic fungicides have replaced this chemical treatment and more and more research is being done on alternative eco-friendly preventive treatments. </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p align="justify" style="text-indent: 3vw;"> Recently, more models and devices designed to be used by individual growers measure temperature, humidity and leaf wetness and provide treatment recommendations based on algorithms similar to the Goidànich model. This general algorithm defined as the 3–10 spray strategy, as the first treatment is prescribed when the average temperature is above 10°C, more than 10 mm of rain have fallen within 24 h and shoot length in the vineyard is at least 10 cm. This plans out the following treatments at regular intervals. Despite evident imprecision due to the strict parameters, this general model can reliably predict the first risk period and recommend thereafter a treatment schedule that will allow growers to prevent development of severe downy mildew in vineyards. The weakness of this type of model is that the number of recommended pesticide sprays is usually greater than what is needed to avoid an epidemic, particularly at the beginning of the season (Gherardi et al., 1999). </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p align="justify" style="text-indent: 3vw;"> Applying a concept based on a tolerance threshold for downy mildew under the particular climatic conditions of southern Switzerland | ||
+ | in a vineyard with cv. Merlot trained in Guyot over several years, Jermini and colleagues (Jermini et al., 2006) were able to eliminate half of the recommended treatments. This paradigm change, from a focus on the pathogen and the disease toward a threshold concept, requires detailed knowledge of the host and its relationship with the environment and human activities, such as pruning and thinning. Plant compensation for foliar damage (Jermini et al., 2010b), and the relation to the reserves in the overwintering wood (Jermini | ||
+ | et al., 2010a) may allow treatments which protect only the grape bunches in later season. These are highly complex interactions and there is little available data describing them (Giuntoli and Orlandini, 2000; Orlandini et al., 2001). The information that is available is heavily biased by site, year and cultivar factors, and so cannot be readily used for simulation and modeling activities. </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 13:08, 3 August 2015