Difference between revisions of "Template:Team:TU Eindhoven/Experimental Approach HTML"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<span class="tekst1"> | <span class="tekst1"> | ||
| − | To | + | We have designed a universal membrane platform which is inherently modular and which can elicit both slow as well as fast responses. To verify the viability of the platform, we devised characterizing the fast cellular responses. In the construction of our device, we planned on conducting a wide range of experiments to verify whether the individual elements of our system worked. These elements include whether the click reaction occurs, verifying whether the signaling components work, whether proximity invokes a response and whether the DBCO-modified aptamers work. An overview of the experiments is given below. |
</span> | </span> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Revision as of 15:40, 5 August 2015
Experimental approach
We have designed a universal membrane platform which is inherently modular and which can elicit both slow as well as fast responses. To verify the viability of the platform, we devised characterizing the fast cellular responses. In the construction of our device, we planned on conducting a wide range of experiments to verify whether the individual elements of our system worked. These elements include whether the click reaction occurs, verifying whether the signaling components work, whether proximity invokes a response and whether the DBCO-modified aptamers work. An overview of the experiments is given below.
Verifying the click reaction
A vital aspect of our device is clicking the aptamers to the membrane proteins. For this click, we madeuse of the exact same click chemistry used by iGEM TU Eindhoven 2014. iGEM TU Eindhoven 2014 has used the click reaction N-terminally. To analyze whether the localization of the azide-functionalized amino acid within the loops of OmpX impedes the click reaction, we clicked a DBCO-functionalized fluorophore (TAMRA) to the outer membrane proteins. After some washing steps and spinning down, we expected the cells to remain fluorescent. To analyze the fluorescence at the single-cell level, we measured cells using the Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter (FACS)
.
A Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter (FACS) is a specialized flow cytometer (see Figure X). The FACS can provide information about cell size, complexity and fluorescence.
The relative cell complexity is measured using size scatter (SSC).
The relative cell size is measured using forward scatter (FSC).
The fluorescence can be measured by using a wide range of filters.
These cell characteristics can be combined to sort cells.
Measuring bioluminiscence & fluorescence
DNA Strand displacement
As we have already touched upon lightly, it has long been thought that nucleic acids had only a single role: carrying hereditary information. As discussed, the discovery that DNA could fold into higher-order structures gave way to SELEX, an evolutionary method of discovering aptamers. The construction of DNA nanostructures, however, was not only carried out through a combinatorial approach: the specificity and predictability of Watson-Crick basepairing enabled rational design for engineering at the nanoscale [1]. Initially, the designed DNA nanostructures were mostly static, but dynamic nanostructures have become available over the years. Most of these dynamic nanostructures share a common feature: they exploit a biophysical phenomenon known as DNA strand-displacement.
DNA Strand displacement is the workhorse of dynamic DNA technology, the field which uses DNA’s non-covalent interactions to assemble higher-order structures. DNA strand displacement is a process where two strands with partial complementarity are hybridized. These pre-assembled DNA strands have only partial complementary, leaving room for a toehold region. When a DNA sequence with full complementary binds to this region (the input), branch migration takes place (see the figure below). In the end, the sequence with full complementary binds to the sequence, yielding the output. 
DNA strand-displacement is a very robust technology: the sequences of the used strands often go unreported as they play a minor role. The robustness of the technology enabled rational design of numerous nanostructures. These nanostructures include DNA walkers, strand displacement cascades and self-assembling dendrimers [1].
In our project, we want to bring two membrane proteins in close proximity through aptamers. To test whether a close proximity indeed triggers an intracellular signal, we used DNA to bring the membrane proteins in close proximity. DNA is the ideal probe for this purpose, as its high specificity and predictability allowed us to bring the membrane proteins in vicinity. To make the system with DNA reversible, we designed a simple system exploiting the strand displacement (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: The membrane proteins can be brought in close proximity by clicking oligonucleotides on the loops and adding a long strand complementary to both oligonucleotides. It is expected that this results in a measurable signal. The longer strand is functionalized with a toehold region. Upon addition of a strand perfectly complementary to the longer strand, the system disassembles and the signal will fade out.
[1] D. Y. Zhang and G. Seelig, “Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand-displacement reactions.,” Nat. Chem., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103–13, Mar. 2011.