Difference between revisions of "Team:Bordeaux/Practices"
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
<p align="justify">The advances in biotechnology techniques also lead to dangerous possible applications causing a general <b>fear of modified organisms</b> by the public. They may be afraid of the organisms that can be created by synthetic biology, afraid that these organisms will somehow <b>grow out of our control</b> or have unexpected properties and will <b>become dangerous for humanity</b>. Our iGEM team observed this while talking to the general public on the streets of Bordeaux. For more information, look at our section Cap Sciences on this page. | <p align="justify">The advances in biotechnology techniques also lead to dangerous possible applications causing a general <b>fear of modified organisms</b> by the public. They may be afraid of the organisms that can be created by synthetic biology, afraid that these organisms will somehow <b>grow out of our control</b> or have unexpected properties and will <b>become dangerous for humanity</b>. Our iGEM team observed this while talking to the general public on the streets of Bordeaux. For more information, look at our section Cap Sciences on this page. | ||
− | <br>In order to limit this fear, the <b>question of transparency</b> is important for scientists. Besides publishing his results, the researcher has to be able to <b>explain his research process</b> and the <b>challenges of the project</b> by stating the explored and the ignored areas. The general audience has to be able to understand his whole scientific approach. | + | <br>In order to limit this fear, the <b>question of transparency</b> is important for scientists. Besides publishing his results, the researcher has to be able to <b>explain his research process</b> and the <b>challenges of the project</b> by stating the explored and the ignored areas. The general audience has to be able to understand his whole scientific approach. Results found, thanks to this approach, contribute to the <b>production of new knowledge and innovation</b> that could be shared to the general public. It is also important for the researcher to analyze his results, looking at the <b>possible negative impacts</b> of his research and estimating the <b>safety and environmental risks</b> and as well the ethical problematic. However, the researcher cannot be the only one in charge of the safety and ethics of his research.</p> |
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 13 August 2015