Team:Aalto-Helsinki/Results

• Project
• Modeling
  • Models of propane pathway
    • Kinetics of propane pathway
    • Model of CAR activation
  • Synergy model
  • Micelle model
  • About cellulose pathway
• Laboratory
  • Lab Book
  • Protocols
  • Safety
  • Practice project
• Results
  • Continuous production
  • Submitted parts
  • Achievements
  • Future
• Practices
  • Combining modeling and experimentation in iGEM
  • Outreach
• Community
  • Collaboration
  • Collaboration Platform
  • Collab seeker
  • Interlab study
    • InterLabBook
• People
  • Team
  • Attributions
• Journal
• 
• 

• Modeling results

• Lab results

• Future

• To the top

--old things for reference for now--

Project Results

Here you can describe the results of your project and your future plans.

What should this page contain?

• Clearly and objectively describe the results of your work.
• Future plans for the project
• Considerations for replicating the experiments

Project Achievements

You can also include a list of bullet points (and links) of the successes and failures you have had over your summer. It is a quick reference page for the judges to see what you achieved during your summer.

• A list of linked bullet points of the successful results during your project
• A list of linked bullet points of the unsuccessful results during your project. This is about being scientifically honest. If you worked on an area for a long time with no success, tell us so we know where you put your effort.

Inspiration

See how other teams presented their results.

• 2014 TU Darmstadt
• 2014 Imperial
• 2014 Paris Bettencourt

--our things start from here--

Results

Modeling results

Propane pathway

We determined the bottlenecks of our reaction, FadB2 being the worst. This caused the lab team to change it to Hbd. After FadB2 the worst bottlenecks are Ado, Car and Hdb. This knowledge affected our decisions on which backbone we should put which construct. Our pathway is also very sensitive to NADPH and NADH concentrations. See more from our page of modeling propane pathway

Cellulose pathway

We didn't get any meaningful results from our (nonexistent) cellulose model.

Micelle

We determined that it is geometrically possible to form the micelles. We also determined that it would be beneficial to put Car and Ado in a micelle instead of the traditional way of them floating independently in the cell.

Lab results

This is a link to our lab results page!

Future

Propane pathway

There is still plenty of room for improvement in the propane pathway. The identified bottlenecks, enzymes CAR and ADO could be studied further to find out whether there are more efficient enzymes with the same function available in the nature. If not, it might be worth the effort to try and engineer the existing CAR and ADO to be more efficient, as has already been once done for ADO. The idea of having different enzymes of the pathway close together, by fusion to each other or by using different kinds of scaffolds, including our amphiphilic proteins, could also be studied further.

In out pathway model, we also identified the propane output to be sensitive to NADPH/NADH concentration. Therefore, it might be that NADPH/NADH is a limiting factor, if its generation is insufficient. This is something worth studying, and if NADPH/NADH regeneration is indeed verified to be a bottleneck, then it could be studied whether this regeneration could somehow be enhanced.

Even though it was not possible within our timeframe, one could try knocking out more endogenous aldehyde reductases and alcohol dehydrogenases that compete with ADO for butyraldehyde. This approach has been tried by Pauli Kallio and his associates with success: knocking out two endogenous aldehyde reductases Ahr and YqhD resulted in significant improvement in propane output.

Propane from sunlight, water and air

One significant benefit of the pathway is that it can operate in the presence of ​oxygen. This is required to incorporate the pathway in oxygenic, photosynthetic organisms like cyanobacteria. Cyanobacterial propane production could have a tremendous effect on the way energy is produced and consumed in the society. Fuel production would essentially require only sunlight, water and CO\(_2\), and would thus be completely renewable.

Improving safety

As propane is a highly flammable liquid, large-scale microbial production could pose a fire and/or explosion hazard. The production would most likely happen in closed containers with nothing to ignite the gas, easing the problem. However, leaks are always possible: the propane or the bacteria themselves could leak from the microbial container or pipelines to enclosed spaces where ignition is possible. By replacing air, propane could also cause a suffocation danger. To help avoid these problems, it would be beneficial if the propane could be detected. However, propane itself cannot be seen and it has no odour, making detection difficult. Gas molecules with an odour (e.g. ethyl mercaptan) could be added to the purified product and production container. However, this does not allow us to detect the gas if the bacteria leak to produce propane in an enclosed space where no such safety measures are taken.

To help detect microbial propane production, it might be thus reasonable to have the propane-producing bacteria also produce a certain scent when propane production is active. This could be achieved by for instance incorporating a banana smell generator device to the same bacterium which is producing propane. Another, perhaps even better option would be to modify the bacteria so that they need to be given certain nutrients not widely available in the environment to survive.