Team:Reading/PublicEngagement

Public Engagement

An opportunity sample of 26 pedestrians in Reading town centre were surveyed with the following questionnaire.


Here is our raw survey data

APPROVAL

This chart shows the average responses to questions 2-7, where the participant is asked for their level of agreement (on a scale of 1-10).
The left hand chart groups the responses with 7 or more as for, 6-4 as neutral, and below 4 as against.


Almost the same number of participants were classed in for against and neutral, however those in the for group are distributed more heavily at the lower end and those in neutral and against are centred around the middle of their category.


These two graphs show that females on average report a marginally higher approval of GM technology. Also there is a large drop in the approval of people above 40.

APPROVAL

This chart shows the average responses to questions 2-7, where the participant is asked for their level of agreement (on a scale of 1-10).
The left hand chart groups the responses with 7 or more as for, 6-4 as neutral, and below 4 as against.

APPROVAL

This chart shows the average responses to questions 2-7, where the participant is asked for their level of agreement (on a scale of 1-10).
The left hand chart groups the responses with 7 or more as for, 6-4 as neutral, and below 4 as against.


Reading University's iGEM team 2015 is sponsored by