Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/PRIA"

Line 19: Line 19:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
   
+
     
 +
     
 
<div>
 
<div>
 
  <div class="Subtitle">
 
  <div class="Subtitle">
 
           <h2>Successful detection of an Analyte <i>in vitro</i> </h2>
 
           <h2>Successful detection of an Analyte <i>in vitro</i> </h2>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
       <p>The main achievement was the establishment of the Plasmid Repressor Interaction Assay. We demonstrated that the detection of analytes in drinking water is feasible in a biological system without transcription or translation of reporterproteins, but just by detecting the disruption of the bond between plasmid DNA and a repressorprotein. We optimized the system for the LacI-<i>lacO</i> model system and are confidential to apply it to all sorts of analytes in the near future.</p>
+
       <p>The main achievement in this subproject was the establishment of a protocol for the Plasmid Repressor Interaction Assay. We demonstrated that the detection of analytes in drinking water is feasible in a biological system without transcription or translation of reporter proteins, but just by detecting the disruption of the bond between plasmid DNA and a repressor protein. We optimized the system for the LacI-<i>lacO</i> model system and are confidential to apply it to all sorts of analytes in the near future.
 +
    </br>
 +
      The procedure performed for the PRIA was based on histagged repressor proteins immobilized on a Ni-NTA agarose column. Plasmid DNA was added to the column, unbound plasmid was washed away and the restant plasmid could be eluted by addition of the analyte to the washing buffer.On a future test strip the immobilized DNA-protein complex would be provided.</br>
 +
    We worked out optimal conditions for the elution of the highest amount possible in the first elution step, since this would correspond to a high signal detectable. The concentration of salt turned out to be essential for the process and the optimal concentration was determined to be 500 mM potassium chloride in a slightly buffered solution. Tap water with the analyte alone could not disrupt the unspecific binding of the plasmid to the DNA. The user would thus be required to add a certain amount of salt to his sample. Common sodium chloride is suitable for that purpose. To further reduce the time for the assay we also tested whether the complex could be formed prior to addition of the complex to the column. This was not successful.
 +
    </p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
     
 +
        <div>
 +
<div class="Subtitle">
 +
          <h2>Immobilization of Protein on paper </h2>
 +
      </div>
 +
    <figure style="float:right; margin-left: 20px">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f9/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_proteinonpaperAugust.png" alt="Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment" width="350 px" >
 +
<figcaption>Immobilized fusion protein on paper after o. n. washing. The proteins fused to sfGFP were used as a negative control, since they were not supposed to bind strongly to the paper. Nevertheless, all spots remained stainend with the same intensity, indicating that protein could be barely washed off with the applied buffers.</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
      <p> We aimed at the development of a paper-based system and had optimized the procedure for immobilized protein. So we pursued the approach which was based on repressors fused to a cellulose binding domain (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1321340" target="_blank">BBa_K1321340</a>). All constructs were cloned and all proteins expressed successfully. When pipetted onto various types of paper, the presence of the proteins could be confirmed by staining and destaining of the paper with Coomassie brilliant blue and destaining solution used for SDS-PAGES (45 % EtOH, 10 % acetic acid in ddH<sub>2</sub>O). The binding was unspecific. Any protein could be pipetted onto paper and be detected with Coomassie brilliant blue after over night washing. Besides, most CBDs bind to microcristalline cellulose or cotton. We were not able to find a hint about the binding of CBDs to common paper. That is why we focused on the second approach with immobilized DNA.
 +
     
 +
    </p>
 +
    </div>
 +
   
 +
     
 
<div>
 
<div>
 +
   
 +
    <div class="Subtitle">
 +
          <h2>Successful immobilization of DNA on paper </h2>
 +
</div>
 +
      <p> Based on a method proposed by Araújo <i>et al.</i> (<a href= "https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/PRIA#Araújo2012">Araújo <i>et al.</i>, 2012</a>) DNA was immobilized on Whatman Filter paper previously activated wth <i>p-phenylene-diisothiocyanate</i>. To accomplish this, aminolabeled DNA is required. We made some adaptations in order to immobilize dsDNA instead of ssDNA. The original protocol demanded an 0.5 hs washing step with 4x SSC buffer, which we omitted, since this serves for the denaturing of DNA. Furthermore to be able to quantify the DNA immobilized on paper we hybridized the amino labeled operatorstrand with the complementary strand that was Cy3 labeled. This was performed via a simple annealing of two primers. So by detecting the Cy3 label via the Typhoon Fluorescence scanner we could be sure, that the immobilized DNA was the correct dsDNA.</br>
 +
      We were not able to acquire molecular sieves at the start of our project, so we dissolved the <i>p</i>-phenylene diisothiocyanate (PDITC) in pure ethanol, which is easily available in any standard molecular biology laboratory. We compared the loss of the Cy3 fluorescence signal upon washing on paper that was activated with PDITC disolved in ethanol to the loss of signal upon washing on paper that was activated with PDITC disolved in dried DMSO. The loss of signal can be mainly attributed to the washing out of DNA, since an control showed, that the decrease of fluorescence of the Cy3 dye due to repeated scanning is minimal. We tried washing with three different liquids: an antibody stripping buffer, that is normally used to disrupt all protein protein interactions in an western blot; water and the binding buffer, that was normally used in our Plasmid Repressor Interaction Assay. Compared to the restant fluorescence signal on the acitvated papers the signal on the not activated papers decreases strongly, indicating that the immobilization was successful, because the signal. The washing with antibody stripping buffer resulted in blurring of the spots. </p>
 +
 +
      <figure id="immobDNA">
 +
              <div class="col-md-6">
 +
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_PRIA_bindingbufferwash.png" alt="Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment" ><figcaption style="text:center;">Washing with binding buffer</figcaption>
 +
 +
              </div>
 +
          <div class="col-md-6">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_PRIA_washwithwater.png" alt="Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment"><figcaption>Washing with water</figcaption>
 +
  </div>
 +
</br>
 +
      <figcaption>Development of the fluorescence signal of Cy3 labeled DNA that was immobilized on paper activated with PDITC dissolved in DMSO or Ethanol respectively. Unactivated Paper served as negative control. The paper was washed for 45 min either with the binding buffer used in PRIA for stabilizing the protein DNA complex (left figure) or with water (right figure) and scanned with the Typhoon various times during this process. The fluorescence was quantified with ImageJ and the peak areas were normalized to the values before the first wash.
 +
</figcaption>
 +
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
</div>
 
       <div class="Subtitle">
 
       <div class="Subtitle">
 
           <h2>Successful Expression and purification of functional sfGFP-tagged repressorproteins</h2>
 
           <h2>Successful Expression and purification of functional sfGFP-tagged repressorproteins</h2>
Line 48: Line 91:
 
<figcaption>EMSA shift caused by addition of arsR-sfGFP to Cy3-labeled operator site.</figcaption>
 
<figcaption>EMSA shift caused by addition of arsR-sfGFP to Cy3-labeled operator site.</figcaption>
 
</figure>
 
</figure>
 +
             
 
               </div>
 
               </div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
Line 53: Line 97:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div>
 
<div>
      <div class="Subtitle">
+
        
          <h2>Successful immobilization of DNA on paper </h2>
+
</div>
+
         
+
 
+
       <p> Based on a method proposed by Araújo <i>et al.</i> (<a href= "https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/PRIA#Araújo2012">Araújo <i>et al.</i>, 2012</a>) DNA was immobilized on Whatman Filter paper previously activated wth <i>p-phenylene-diisothiocyanate</i>. To accomplish this, aminolabeled DNA is required. We made some adaptations in order to immobilize dsDNA instead of ssDNA. The original protocol demanded an 0.5 hs washing step with 4x SSC buffer, which we omitted, since this serves for the denaturing of DNA. Furthermore to be able to quantify the DNA immobilized on paper we hybridized the amino labeled operatorstrand with the complementary strand that was Cy3 labeled, this was performed via a simple annealing of two primers. So by detecting the Cy3 label via the Typhoon Fluorescence scanner we could be sure, that the immobilized DNA was the correct dsDNA.</br>
+
      We were not able to acquire molecular sieves at the start of our project, so we dissolved the <i>p</i>-phenylene diisothiocyanate (PDITC) in pure ethanol, which is easily available in any standard molecular biology laboratory. We compared the loss of the Cy3 fluorescence signal upon washing on paper that was activated with PDITC disolved in ethanol to the loss of signal upon washing on paper that was activated with PDITC disolved in dried DMSO. The loss of signal can be mainly attributed to the washing out of DNA, since an control showed, that the decrease of fluorescence of the Cy3 dye due to repeated scanning is minimal. We tried washing with three different liquids: an antibody stripping buffer, that is normally used to disrupt all protein protein interactions in an western blot; water and the binding buffer, that was normally used in our Plasmid Repressor Interaction Assay.</p>
+
 
+
      <figure id="immobDNA">
+
              <div class="col-md-6">
+
 
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_PRIA_bindingbufferwash.png" alt="Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment" >
+
 
+
              </div>
+
          <div class="col-md-6">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a7/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_PRIA_washwithwater.png" alt="Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment">
+
  </div>
+
</br>
+
      <figcaption>Development of the fluorescence signal of Cy3 labeled DNA that was immobilized on paper activated with PDITC dissolved in DMSO or Ethanol respectively. Unactivated Paper served as negative control. The paper was washed for 45 min either with the binding buffer used in PRIA for stabilizing the protein DNA complex (left figure) or with water (right figure) and scanned with the Typhoon various times during this process. The fluorescence was quantified with ImageJ and the peak areas were normalized to the values before the first wash.
+
</figcaption>
+
 
+
</figure>
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
<div>
 
<div>
  
<div class="Subtitle">
+
 
          <h2>Immobilization of Protein on paper </h2>
+
      </div>
+
    <figure style="float:right; margin-left: 20px">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f9/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_proteinonpaperAugust.png" alt="Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment" width="350 px" >
+
<figcaption>Immobilized fusion protein on paper after o. n. washing. The proteins fused to sfGFP were used as a negative control, since they were not supposed to bind strongly to the paper. Nevertheless, all spots remained stainend with the same intensity, indicating that protein could be barely washed off with the applied buffers.</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
      <p> We pursued our second approach which was based on repressors fused to a cellulose binding domain (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1321340" target="_blank">BBa_K1321340</a>). All constructs were cloned successfully. When pipetted onto various types of paper, its presence could be confirmed by staining and destaining of the paper with Coomassie brilliant blue and destaining solution used for SDS-PAGES (45 % EtOH, 10 % acetic acid in ddH<sub>2</sub>O). The binding was unspecific. Any protein could be pipetted onto paper and be detected with Coomassie brilliant blue. Besides, most CBDs bind to microcristalline cellulose or cotton. We were not able to find a hint about the binding of CBDs to common paper. That is why we focused on the approach with immobilized DNA.
+
     
+
    </p>
+
    <br>
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
<br>
+
</div>
+
 
<div>
 
<div>
 
       <div class="Subtitle">
 
       <div class="Subtitle">

Revision as of 14:49, 11 September 2015

iGEM Bielefeld 2015


PRIA Results

A cell free detection system based on purified components

Successful detection of an Analyte in vitro

The main achievement in this subproject was the establishment of a protocol for the Plasmid Repressor Interaction Assay. We demonstrated that the detection of analytes in drinking water is feasible in a biological system without transcription or translation of reporter proteins, but just by detecting the disruption of the bond between plasmid DNA and a repressor protein. We optimized the system for the LacI-lacO model system and are confidential to apply it to all sorts of analytes in the near future.
The procedure performed for the PRIA was based on histagged repressor proteins immobilized on a Ni-NTA agarose column. Plasmid DNA was added to the column, unbound plasmid was washed away and the restant plasmid could be eluted by addition of the analyte to the washing buffer.On a future test strip the immobilized DNA-protein complex would be provided.
We worked out optimal conditions for the elution of the highest amount possible in the first elution step, since this would correspond to a high signal detectable. The concentration of salt turned out to be essential for the process and the optimal concentration was determined to be 500 mM potassium chloride in a slightly buffered solution. Tap water with the analyte alone could not disrupt the unspecific binding of the plasmid to the DNA. The user would thus be required to add a certain amount of salt to his sample. Common sodium chloride is suitable for that purpose. To further reduce the time for the assay we also tested whether the complex could be formed prior to addition of the complex to the column. This was not successful.

Immobilization of Protein on paper

Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment
Immobilized fusion protein on paper after o. n. washing. The proteins fused to sfGFP were used as a negative control, since they were not supposed to bind strongly to the paper. Nevertheless, all spots remained stainend with the same intensity, indicating that protein could be barely washed off with the applied buffers.

We aimed at the development of a paper-based system and had optimized the procedure for immobilized protein. So we pursued the approach which was based on repressors fused to a cellulose binding domain (BBa_K1321340). All constructs were cloned and all proteins expressed successfully. When pipetted onto various types of paper, the presence of the proteins could be confirmed by staining and destaining of the paper with Coomassie brilliant blue and destaining solution used for SDS-PAGES (45 % EtOH, 10 % acetic acid in ddH2O). The binding was unspecific. Any protein could be pipetted onto paper and be detected with Coomassie brilliant blue after over night washing. Besides, most CBDs bind to microcristalline cellulose or cotton. We were not able to find a hint about the binding of CBDs to common paper. That is why we focused on the second approach with immobilized DNA.

Successful immobilization of DNA on paper

Based on a method proposed by Araújo et al. (Araújo et al., 2012) DNA was immobilized on Whatman Filter paper previously activated wth p-phenylene-diisothiocyanate. To accomplish this, aminolabeled DNA is required. We made some adaptations in order to immobilize dsDNA instead of ssDNA. The original protocol demanded an 0.5 hs washing step with 4x SSC buffer, which we omitted, since this serves for the denaturing of DNA. Furthermore to be able to quantify the DNA immobilized on paper we hybridized the amino labeled operatorstrand with the complementary strand that was Cy3 labeled. This was performed via a simple annealing of two primers. So by detecting the Cy3 label via the Typhoon Fluorescence scanner we could be sure, that the immobilized DNA was the correct dsDNA.
We were not able to acquire molecular sieves at the start of our project, so we dissolved the p-phenylene diisothiocyanate (PDITC) in pure ethanol, which is easily available in any standard molecular biology laboratory. We compared the loss of the Cy3 fluorescence signal upon washing on paper that was activated with PDITC disolved in ethanol to the loss of signal upon washing on paper that was activated with PDITC disolved in dried DMSO. The loss of signal can be mainly attributed to the washing out of DNA, since an control showed, that the decrease of fluorescence of the Cy3 dye due to repeated scanning is minimal. We tried washing with three different liquids: an antibody stripping buffer, that is normally used to disrupt all protein protein interactions in an western blot; water and the binding buffer, that was normally used in our Plasmid Repressor Interaction Assay. Compared to the restant fluorescence signal on the acitvated papers the signal on the not activated papers decreases strongly, indicating that the immobilization was successful, because the signal. The washing with antibody stripping buffer resulted in blurring of the spots.

Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment
Washing with binding buffer
Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment
Washing with water

Development of the fluorescence signal of Cy3 labeled DNA that was immobilized on paper activated with PDITC dissolved in DMSO or Ethanol respectively. Unactivated Paper served as negative control. The paper was washed for 45 min either with the binding buffer used in PRIA for stabilizing the protein DNA complex (left figure) or with water (right figure) and scanned with the Typhoon various times during this process. The fluorescence was quantified with ImageJ and the peak areas were normalized to the values before the first wash.

Successful Expression and purification of functional sfGFP-tagged repressorproteins

The repressor for arsenic and the Repressor of the blc operon, as well as our model protein LacI were tagged with a sfGFP c-terminally. Their binding to DNA could be proven by EMSA. LacI-sfGFP and arsR-sfGFP showed a clear EMSA shift (see below).

Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment
EMSA shift caused by addition of lacI-sfGFP to Cy3-labeled operator site.
Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment
EMSA shift caused by addition of blcR-sfGFP to Cy3-labeled operator site.
Sorry, cannot load this file at the moment
EMSA shift caused by addition of arsR-sfGFP to Cy3-labeled operator site.

Successful simultaneous visualization of Protein and DNA on paper

Since the repressorproteins we wanted to detect were tagged with sfGFP, they were detectable via fluorescence. DNA was labeled with Cy3 containing primers, therefore it was also detectable on paper. Both components were visualized with the Ettan Dige. The exposure time was optimized as was the paper that was used.

Tecan Measurements

...

References

Araújo, Ana Caterina; Song, Yajing; Lundeberg, Joakim; Stahl, Patrik L.; Brumer, Harry (2012): Activated Paper Surfaces for the Rapid Hybridization of DNA through Capillary Transport. In Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, pp. 3311-3317. DOI: 10.1021/ac300025v

Lehtiö, Janne; Wernerús, Henrik; Samuelson, Patrik; Teeri, Tuula T.; Stahl, Stefan (2001): Directed immobillization of recombinant staphylococci on cotton fibers by functional display of a fungal cellulose-binding domain. In FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001, 195(2), pp. 197-204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10521.x 197-204

Siddiki, Mohammad Shohel Rana; Kawakami, Yasunari; Ueda, Shunsaku; Maeda, Isamu (2011): Solid Phase Biosensors for Arsenic or Cadmium Composed of A trans Factor and cis Element Complex.In Sensors 2011, 11, pp. 10063-10073. 10.3390/s111110063