Difference between revisions of "Team:SVCE Chennai/Project"

Line 167: Line 167:
 
         </p>
 
         </p>
 
          
 
          
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/b/ba/Plasmid_design_v1.jpg/652px-Plasmid_design_v1.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
+
             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a3/Cas1.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
 
          
 
          
 +
            <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/89/Cas2.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
 
         <p>pSB1K3 was preferred to pUC vectors since minicell purification involves the addition of  
 
         <p>pSB1K3 was preferred to pUC vectors since minicell purification involves the addition of  
  
Line 194: Line 195:
 
             the lac operator and the T7 promoter.</p>
 
             the lac operator and the T7 promoter.</p>
 
          
 
          
           <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/b/ba/Plasmid_design_v1.jpg/652px-Plasmid_design_v1.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
+
           <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/13/PET-24a%28%2B%29_Map.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
 +
       
 
         <p>Hence, a second construct was designed utilizing the pET 24a vector. The complete insert was to  
 
         <p>Hence, a second construct was designed utilizing the pET 24a vector. The complete insert was to  
  
Line 203: Line 205:
 
             the entire insert.</p>
 
             the entire insert.</p>
 
          
 
          
              <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/b/ba/Plasmid_design_v1.jpg/652px-Plasmid_design_v1.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
+
              <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/1d/Cas3.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
 
         <p>The sequences for both the cassettes were ordered as gBlocks® from IDT. The complete cassette  
 
         <p>The sequences for both the cassettes were ordered as gBlocks® from IDT. The complete cassette  
  
Line 213: Line 215:
  
 
             5’ araC reading frame.</p>
 
             5’ araC reading frame.</p>
               <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/b/ba/Plasmid_design_v1.jpg/652px-Plasmid_design_v1.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
+
               <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/bf/Cas4.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
 +
                      <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/00/Cas5.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
 +
       
 
         <p>The gBlocks® received were PCR amplified. No amplification was detected for gBlock® 1. We  
 
         <p>The gBlocks® received were PCR amplified. No amplification was detected for gBlock® 1. We  
  
Line 226: Line 230:
 
             containing the two test bacteriocin sequences were obtained from IDT.</p>
 
             containing the two test bacteriocin sequences were obtained from IDT.</p>
 
         <p>The fragments were cloned one by one in the pET 24a vector.</p>
 
         <p>The fragments were cloned one by one in the pET 24a vector.</p>
           <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/thumb/b/ba/Plasmid_design_v1.jpg/652px-Plasmid_design_v1.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
+
           <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/eb/Plasmid_design_v2.jpg" class="img-responsive ourImage">
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 19:47, 18 September 2015

Project: Minicins

Project Design

Our project aims to neuter multidrug resistant bacterial infections with the help of bacteriocins in a minicell chassis.

Firstly, the idea was to use two different plasmids – one for minicell division and the other for bacteriocin production. Then, we realized that plasmids are carried to the minicells. This requires the use of two different plasmids with two different promoters. Instead of going for two different plasmids, we modulated our design to a plasmid with two different expression cassettes.

The two cassettes are under the regulation of different promoters for the expression of the different phenotypes. Minicell phenotype, driven by the overexpression of the ftsZ gene, is under the regulation of the IPTG-controlled lac promoter. Bacteriocin production is driven by the arabinose operon.

In order to confirm the expression of ftsZ, GFP is included under the lac promoter control by the introduction of an RBS after the ftsZ stop codon. Similarly, bacteriocin production is tagged to RFP.

pSB1K3 was preferred to pUC vectors since minicell purification involves the addition of penicillin and that requires penicillin – sensitivestrains. In order to drive very high expression of ftsZ, we decided to use the T7 promoter. It requires T7 RNA polymerase, which also needs to be cloned into the plasmid. ftsZ can be indirectly regulated by controlling the expression of T7 RNA polymerase.

A major drawback that can be seen in this design is that there are over 10 inserts and the total insert size amounts to more than 8 kb.

The number of inserts and their size can be greatly reduced by judicious selection of the vector and the host strain. In order reduce the inserts corresponding to the ftsZ regulation which involves T7 RNA polymerase and promoter, BL21 was chosen as the host strain and pET 24a was identified as the vector. BL21 strain has T7 RNA polymerase inserted into its genomic DNA. pET 24a vector has a multiple cloning region preceded by an operator region consisting of the lac operator and the T7 promoter.

Hence, a second construct was designed utilizing the pET 24a vector. The complete insert was to be inserted between the NdeI and XhoI restriction sites. After assembly of the parts by standard biobrick assembly, the complete insert will be PCR amplified with NdeI and XhoI sites flanking the entire insert.

The sequences for both the cassettes were ordered as gBlocks® from IDT. The complete cassette was divided into two gBlocks® sized 1664 bp and 1057 bp respectively. A SacI site was introduced in the araC region of the pBAD promoter. The nucleotide in position 430 was mutated from C to G for creating a unique SacI site. The mutation created no changes in the 3’- 5’ araC reading frame.

The gBlocks® received were PCR amplified. No amplification was detected for gBlock® 1. We deduced that the gBlock® had denatured into several small fragments by agarose gel electrophoresis. Hence, we set out for standard biobrick assembly to assemble ftsZ, T0 terminator and pBAD/araC promoter. The block 1 was constructed by assembling every component. PCR amplification was then done to introduce the NdeI and SacI restriction sites. The gblock® 2 containing the two test bacteriocin sequences were obtained from IDT.

The fragments were cloned one by one in the pET 24a vector.

Lets talk!

Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Chennai