Difference between revisions of "Team:Czech Republic/Practices"
CecylHynek (Talk | contribs) (→Key outputs) |
CecylHynek (Talk | contribs) (→Key outputs) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
'''Use a change of color instead of the agglutination as an indicator of CTCs' presence''' | '''Use a change of color instead of the agglutination as an indicator of CTCs' presence''' | ||
| + | |||
In response, a group of experiments from module 2 was changed to use GFP as an indicator of successful communication between IODs. The use of color indication in the further research proved advantageous (atleast partially), and the use of color indicators will be always considered in later experiments. | In response, a group of experiments from module 2 was changed to use GFP as an indicator of successful communication between IODs. The use of color indication in the further research proved advantageous (atleast partially), and the use of color indicators will be always considered in later experiments. | ||
| − | '''A recommendation to test the agglutination on a slide | + | '''A recommendation to test the agglutination on a slide''' |
| + | |||
| + | In response, since we have the possibility to perform our experiments in microfluidics, we will consider sticking by this advice and will use microfluidics in our future agglutination experiments. | ||
[[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/Interview | Read the interview...]] | [[Team:Czech_Republic/Practices/Interview | Read the interview...]] | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 17 September 2015
Human Practice
Contents
Outreach strategy
The IOD band presents a new approach to diagnostics and diagnostic engineering. So at Team Czech Republic we addressed engineers and medical experts to discuss the application and the novel engineering approach. In addition, Czech Republic teamed up with Chalmers Gothenburg to conduct a multinational survey on public conception of Synthetic Biology.
Engineering
Since our project brings an innovative approach into engineering we wanted to obtain an opinion of young engineers. We had a great possibility to present our project and synthetic biology in general on a lecture Introduction into Cybernetics lead by Prof. Ing. Miloš Schlegel CSc. The response was very positive. Several students even showed deeper interest in synthetic biology and we provided them more information individually.
Key outputs:
Medicine
In order to get a professional opinion on our project and to learn more about cancer and CTCs, we conducted an interview with two cancer specialists, Mgr. Pavel Pitule, Ph.D. and Mgr. Pavel Ostašov, Ph.D. The interview took place at the Biomedical Center of Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen. After introduction of our project idea we discussed some particularly interesting points. This interview was not only helpful and enriching but also led to an agreement to collaborate with the Laboratory of Tumor Biology in the near future.
Key outputs
Use a change of color instead of the agglutination as an indicator of CTCs' presence
In response, a group of experiments from module 2 was changed to use GFP as an indicator of successful communication between IODs. The use of color indication in the further research proved advantageous (atleast partially), and the use of color indicators will be always considered in later experiments.
A recommendation to test the agglutination on a slide
In response, since we have the possibility to perform our experiments in microfluidics, we will consider sticking by this advice and will use microfluidics in our future agglutination experiments.
Mgr. Pavel Pitule Ph.D.
Mgr. Pavel Pitule, Ph.D. is a junior researcher at the Biomedical Center at the Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen. He is the research group leader of Laboratory of Tumor Biology.
Mgr. Pavel Ostašov Ph.D.
Mgr. Pavel Ostašov, Ph.D. is a researcher at the Biomedical Center at the Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen. He is a member of Laboratory of Tumor Biology.
Multinational general public vs. biologists GMO survey
Team Chalmers Gothenburg suggested us to participate in their GMO survey. We asked 63 biologists and 50 respondents from general public to fill in the survey. Same thing was done in Sweden. Thanks to that we have the opportunity to compare GMO knowledge in Sweden and Czech Republic. Big thanks belongs to team Chalmers Gothenburg for statistical evaluation of all data.
Key output
Safety