Difference between revisions of "Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Human practices"
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
| − | + | ||
<div class="col-md-6 left"> | <div class="col-md-6 left"> | ||
| + | <h2 class="title1">INTEGRATED HUMAN PRACTICES</h2> | ||
<h3 class="title">"How could we test the efficacy of our products?" </h3> | <h3 class="title">"How could we test the efficacy of our products?" </h3> | ||
<h4 class="title">Integrated Policy and Practices </h4> | <h4 class="title">Integrated Policy and Practices </h4> | ||
Revision as of 17:12, 15 September 2015
INTEGRATED HUMAN PRACTICES
"How could we test the efficacy of our products?"
Integrated Policy and Practices
There are significant ethical considerations with the production of genetically engineered food supplements. We were particularly interested in investigating which of our two possible approaches for increasing butyrate would make a more ethical product and also how we would be able to show efficacy of either in humans.
To find out about how health benefits are usually tested, we consulted experts in the School of Nutrition at the University of East Anglia’s Medical School who have expertise in designing human intervention studies to determine the health benefits of foods and dietary supplements. We then designed a theoretical feeding trial that would test the efficacy of our products.
You can learn more by clicking on the image on the right.
