Difference between revisions of "Team:UCLA/Project/Protein Expression and Processing"

 
(47 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Template:UCLA}}
 
{{Template:UCLA}}
 +
  
 
<!--PAGE HEADER-->
 
<!--PAGE HEADER-->
 +
 
<html lang="en">
 
<html lang="en">
 +
 
<div class= "page_header">
 
<div class= "page_header">
 
     <a href="#background"><div class= "page_header_box" id= "box1">
 
     <a href="#background"><div class= "page_header_box" id= "box1">
Line 20: Line 23:
 
            
 
            
 
     </div></a>
 
     </div></a>
 +
 +
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<br/><br/>
 
<br/><br/>
Line 38: Line 43:
  
 
<!--CONTENT-->
 
<!--CONTENT-->
<div class= "content_container">
+
<div class= "content_container" float = "top">
<div class= "page_content" id= "section1">
+
<div class= "page_content" id= "section1" float = "top">
  
 
<!--BACKGROUND-->
 
<!--BACKGROUND-->
<div class= "content_subsection" id="background">
+
<div class= "content_subsection" id="background" float = "top">
<h1>Protein Expression and Processing</h1>
+
<h1>Materials Processing</h1>
 
<h2>Background</h2>
 
<h2>Background</h2>
 
<h4>Abstract</h4>
 
<h4>Abstract</h4>
Line 50: Line 55:
  
  
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0c/UCLAiGEM2015_Cospun_StressStrain.png">
+
 
 
</p>  
 
</p>  
<h4>Introduction</h4>
+
<h1>Introduction</h1>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 
To create functionalized fibers, we co-spun the NCSilkGFP with native Bombyx mori silk. The NCSilkGFP was designed such that the N and C termini have affinity to b.mori silk, allowing it to bind to the native silk upon spinning.  
 
To create functionalized fibers, we co-spun the NCSilkGFP with native Bombyx mori silk. The NCSilkGFP was designed such that the N and C termini have affinity to b.mori silk, allowing it to bind to the native silk upon spinning.  
Line 62: Line 67:
 
<!--METHODOLOGY-->
 
<!--METHODOLOGY-->
 
<div class= "content_subsection" id="methodology">
 
<div class= "content_subsection" id="methodology">
<h2>Methodology</h2>
+
<h1>Methods for co-spinning silk with the NCSilkGFP</h1>
<ol type="A">
+
<p>In brief, we followed the standard process as highlighted in the literature <sup><a href = "http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/v6/n10/full/nprot.2011.379.html">[1]</a></sup> to produce a concentrated aqueous solution, or dope, of commercially purchased b.mori silk. We then added aqueous NCSilkGFP to the concentrated b.mori dope so that the final solution had 750 grams of b.mori silk to 1 gram of NCSilkGFP. We then extruded this dope into a coagulation bath of 90% v/v isopropanol and water and collected the resulting fiber on a godet. Detailed steps are as follows:
<li>
+
</p>
In brief, we followed the standard process as highlighted in the literature (REF http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/v6/n10/full/nprot.2011.379.html) to produce a concentrated aqueous solution, or dope, of commercially purchased b.mori silk. We then added aqueous NCSilkGFP to the concentrated b.mori dope so that the final solution had 750 grams of b.mori silk to 1 gram of NCSilkGFP. We then extruded this dope into a coagulation bath of 90% v/v isopropanol and water and collected the resulting fiber on a godet. Detailed steps are as follows:
+
</li>
+
  
 +
<h4>Degumming</h4>
 +
<p>Silk is comprised of two main proteins, fibroin and sericin. Fibroin is the structural protein of the silk and our protein of interest. Sericin serves as the ‘glue’ of the silk. Degumming separates and removes sericin and is an essential preparation step before dissolving the silk. We found that commercially degummed silk was not properly degummed for our purposes and this step had to be carried out in-lab.</p>
 +
<p>To degum, we boiled 2.5 grams of B.mori silk in 0.02M sodium carbonate solution for 30 minutes.</p>
  
<figure><img style="margin-left: 25%; width: 500px;" src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b9/Fig_1_ICA_Methodology.png" />
+
<h4>Solubilization</h4>
<figcaption  style="margin: auto; width: 100%;">
+
<p>The resilience of silk to many different solvents is well known. In order to dissolve silk, we used lithium bromide, a strong chaotrope<sup>[1]</sup> that disrupts the hydrogen bonds and thus secondary structure of the silk. </p>
<b>Fig 1:</b>In ICA, the initiator of the growing DNA chains are immobilized on magnetic streptavidin beads to facilitate removal. The first monomer is ligated to the initiator. (Step A) Subsequent ligation steps incorporate capping oligos, which prevent the extension of incorrect chains: those that failed to ligate in the previous round. (Steps B, C) Ligation continues until the construct reaches the final desired length. The final step incorporates a terminator oligo. (Final Step) Only DNA constructs of the correct size can ligate to the terminator, as all incorrect constructs will have been capped.
+
<p>We dissolved our silk in 9.3M LiBr at 60 C for 4 hours. </p>
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
  
<li>
+
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
A basic biobrick for ICA consists of a gene monomer flanked by BsaI recognition and cleavage sites. While each of the core monomer is identical, the restriction sites are oriented such that digestion with BsaI yields distinct sticky ends for each of the three types of units. These pieces must be digested to reveal the sticky ends before assembly.
+
<a href = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/10/LiBr_soluble_silk.jpg">
</li>
+
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/10/LiBr_soluble_silk.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
<li>
+
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">Silk solubilized in 9.3M lithium bromide.</figcaption></figure>
Accessory pieces required in ICA include the initiator, streptavidin coated beads, the terminator, and the capping oligos.
+
<p style = "clear:both;">
    <ol type="i">
+
    <li>
+
    The initiator is a dsDNA fragment made by annealing two ssDNA oligos together. The initiator is designed such that one end is biotinylated, for conjugation to streptavidin coated beads. The other end has a sticky overhang and is designed to anneal to the forward sticky end of the ‘A-type’ monomer unit. This end is 5’-phosphorylated to enable ligation. The initiator also contains a primer binding site that can be used for PCR amplification, as well as other accessory sequences such as affinity tags and the biobrick prefix.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
    Streptavidin coated beads serve as a solid support for the elongating DNA chain during ICA. The biotinylated end of the initiator binds to streptavidin to anchor the nascent construct. The ability to physically separate the DNA from solution is needed due to repeated wash and ligation steps used during ICA.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
    The terminator is constructed similarly to the initiator, but lacks biotinylation. One end of the terminator is compatible to the reverse sticky end of the ‘C-type’ monomer unit. This end is 5’-phosphorylated to enable ligation. The terminator also contains a primer binding site that can be used for PCR amplification, as well as the biobrick suffix.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
      The capping oligos are comprised of a single 5’-phosphorylated ssDNA oligo that can form a stable stem loop structure with a unique sticky end. There are three distinct caps, each of which can bind to the A, B, or C sticky ends
+
    </li>
+
    </ol>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
In each extension step, the next sequential monomer (A, B, or C) is added onto the growing chain. Chains that failed to extend during the previous extension step are capped using a hair-pin oligo that prevents subsequent extension. These capped chains are still present in the mixture for the duration of ICA, but do not participate in any ligation event, and are not amplified in the final PCR. Each final construct is flanked by a biotinylated initiator oligo which allows immobilization onto streptavidin beads, and a terminator oligo. These two oligos provide primer annealing sites which can be used to amplify the sequence using conventional PCR.
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
A generalized workflow is demonstrated below:
+
    <ol type="i">
+
    <li>
+
    The initiator, terminator, and capping oligos are prepared ahead of time by mixing the relevant oligos and ramping down from 95 C to form the working oligos.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
    Monomers of each type (A, B, C) are digested from plasmid with BsaI and purified prior to ICA. These are termed working monomers.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
    The initiator is attached to the streptavidin coated beads.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
    An ‘A-type’ monomer is ligated to the end of the initiator. Afterwards, any unreacted fragments, as well as the ligase are washed off.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
    Next, the ‘B-type’ monomer is ligated to the end of the growing chain. In this reaction mixture, an ‘A-type’ cap is also included, to terminate any chains that failed to extend in the previous ‘A-type’ ligation. Again, unreacted fragments are removed by washing.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
      Next, the ‘C-type’ monomer is ligated. This reaction mixture contains the ‘B-type’ cap.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
      Next the ‘A-type’ monomer is ligated. This time, the ‘C-type’ cap is also included in the mixture.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
    This proceeds in a repetitive fashion until the desired construct length is reached.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
    The final constructed is eluted off the beads. The eluate is used as a template for PCR to amplify the construct. Only complete constructs that contain the initiator and terminator are amplified. Capped constructs do not amplify.
+
    </li>
+
    <li>
+
    The amplified construct can now be used for downstream cloning.
+
    </li>
+
    </ol>
+
</li>
+
</ol>
+
  
</div>
 
  
 +
<p>We dialyzed our silk in SnakeSkin Dialysis Tubing of 3.5 kDa molecular weight cutoff against double deionized water. We dialyzed for 48 hours with a total of 6 dialysis bath changes. Following dialysis, we centrifuged the solution to remove any flocculents and other insoluble proteins. </p>
  
  
<!--RESULTS-->
 
<div class= "content_subsection" id="results">
 
<h2>Results</h2>
 
<p>
 
Using ICA, we have generated 10 silk constructs. These include constructs of pure MaSp2 ranging from 3-15 mers, pure MaSp1 of 9 and 12-mers and 12-mers of MaSp1/2 hybrids in 3 different ratios.
 
</p>
 
<h4>Future Directions</h4>
 
<p>
 
While we were able to construct many sequences of varying length and composition using ICA, we were unable to explore its maximum potential for cloning repetitive genes. We have not established an upper limit on the number of monomers able to be assemble using ICA. In addition, we have not explored the extended use of ICA to create extremely large (greater than 50 monomer units)
 
</p>
 
<h4>Achievements</h4>
 
<ol>
 
<li>
 
Successfully improved last year’s biobrick BBa_K1384000
 
    <ol type="a">
 
    <li>
 
    Redesigned MaSp1 and MaSp2 monomers with modified sticky ends, and cloned these into biobricks.
 
    </li>
 
    </ol>
 
</li>
 
<li>
 
Created a collection of parts to be used for Iterative Capped Assembly
 
</li>
 
<li>
 
Demonstrated that ICA is adaptable to silk using our designed sticky ends.
 
    <ol type="a">
 
    <li>
 
    Optimized ICA for use with spider silk genes to enable fast, efficient assembly of repetitive constructs.
 
    </li>
 
    </ol>
 
</li>
 
<li>
 
Used ICA to assemble a variety of silk genetic constructs of different length and composition to examine their properties.
 
    <ol type="a">
 
    <li>
 
    Used ICA to create 10 different silk constructs ranging from 3-mers to 15-mers, and constructs with MaSp1 and MaSp2 in ratios of [1:2], [1:1] and [2:1].
 
    </li>
 
    </ol>
 
</li>
 
</ol>
 
</div>
 
  
 +
<h4>Concentration Dialysis</h4>
 +
<p>The previous dialysis results in an aqueous silk solution with concentration ranging from 4% w/v to 8% w/v (40 - 80 mg/mL). This is too dilute to spin into a fiber, so the solution must be concentrated by dialyzing against a highly concentrated polymer solution. The polymer solution draws water out from the silk solution by osmotic pressure. </p>
 +
<p>To concentrate, we dialyzed 10 mL of aqueous silk solution in a Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassette of 3.5 kDa Molecular weight cutoff against a solution of 10% w/v 10,000 molecular weight PEG for 18 hours. This will yield an aqueous silk solution of 15-18% w/v (150-200 mg/mL) concentration. Dialyzing the solution for too long will overconcentrate the silk dope, which will lead to the silk forming a gel in the cassette. Once a silk has gelled, it is no longer usable in any further processing steps. </p>
  
 +
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/7d/Uclaigem2015_concentratedaqueoussilk.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">19% w/v silk dope after concentration dialysis.</figcaption></figure>
 +
<p style = "clear:both;">
  
<!--BIOBRICKS-->
+
<p><h4>Spiking with the NCSilkGFP</h4></p>
<div class= "content_subsection" id="biobricks">
+
<p>NCSilkGFP was added to the silk dope such that the resulting solution had a 1:750 mass to mass ratio of NCSilkGFP to native B.mori silk. </p>
<h2>List of Biobricks</h2>
+
<ul>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763002"> MaSp2 AB:              BBa_K1763002 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763003">MaSp2 BC: BBa_K1763003 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763004">MaSp2 CA: BBa_K1763004  </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763009">MaSp2 SeqAB: BBa_K1763009 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763010">MaSp1 AB: BBa_K1763010 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763011">MaSp1 BC: BBa_K1763011 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763012">MaSp1 CA: BBa_K1763012 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763023">MaSp1 SeqAB2:         BBa_K1763423 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763424">M2-3(1C3): BBa_K1763424 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763425">M2-3(T7): BBa_K1763425 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763426">M2-6(1C3): BBa_K1763426 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763427">M2-6(T7): BBa_K1763427 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763428">M2-9(1C3): BBa_K1763428 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763429">M2-9(T7): BBa_K1763429 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763430">M2-12(1C3): BBa_K1763430 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763431">M2-12(T7): BBa_K1763431 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763432">M2-15(1C3): BBa_K1763432 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763433">M2-15(T7): BBa_K1763433 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763434">M1-9(1C3): BBa_K1763434 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763435">M1-9(T7): BBa_K1763435 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763436">M1-12(1C3): BBa_K1763436 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763437">M1-12(T7): BBa_K1763437 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763438">M1/2[2:1]-12(1C3): BBa_K1763438 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763439">M1/2[2:1]-12(T7): BBa_K1763439 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763440">M1/2[1:1]-12(1C3): BBa_K1763440 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763441">M1/2[1:1]-12(T7): BBa_K1763441 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763442">M1/2[1:2]-12(1C3): BBa_K1763442 </a>
+
</li>
+
<li>
+
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1763443">M1/2[1:2]-12(T7): BBa_K1763443 </a>
+
</li>
+
</ul>
+
  
</div>
+
<h4>Spinning the composite silk</h4>
 +
<p>In order to form fibers from silk, soluble silk protein solutions must be much like how they are in natural spider spinnerets. The majority of spinning methods entail pushing, or extruding, silk solution through very thin channels. During this extrusion, shear forces on the silk solution cause the amino acids of the proteins to align in a way that allows the strong beta sheets of the silk structure to form. Multiple proteins are similarly aligned, causing separate proteins to interact and form larger structures.<sup>[2]</sup></p>
 +
<p>We used a 21 gauge needle to load the silk dope into a 1 mL BD syringe with luer lok. We then replaced the needle with PEEK tubing of 0.127 mm inner diameter. We used a syringe pump to extrude the silk at a rate of 10 uL/min into a coagulation bath of 90% v/v isopropanol and water. After the fiber formed, we drew it out of the bath and wound it around a pair of tweezers that we spun by hand to collect the fiber as it formed. In later iterations of our spinning apparatus, we wound the fiber around a motorized godet to collect the fiber as it formed in order to automate the process. We designed the godet in OpenSCAD and 3D printed it in a Stratasys UPrint SE.</p>
  
 +
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
 +
<img src = "http://giant.gfycat.com/WellwornRareCock.gif" width = 600px>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">An early iteration of our silk spinning setup where we wound our fibers by hand around a pair of tweezers.</figcaption></figure>
  
  
<!--REFERENCES-->
 
<div class= "content_subsection" id="references">
 
<h2>References</h2>
 
<p>
 
Briggs A., Rios X., Chari R., Luhan Y., Zhang F., Mali P., and Church G. Iterative capped assembly: rapid and scalable synthesis of repeat-module DNA such as TAL effectors from individual monomers. <i>Nucleic Acids Research.</i> 2012;<b>40</b>(15): e117
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
Hinman, M.B., Lewis, R. Isolation of a clone encoding a second dragline silk fibroin. Nephila clavipes dragline silk is a two-protein fiber. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267: 19320–19324.
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
Tokareva O., Michalczechen-Lacerda V., Rech E., and Kaplan D. Recombinant DNA production of spider silk proteins. <i>Microbial Biotechnology.</i> 2013;<b>6</b>(6): 651-663
 
</p>
 
<p>
 
Xu, M., Lewis, R.V. Structure of a protein superfiber: spider dragline silk. PNAS;1990;87, 7120.
 
</p?
 
</div>
 
  
 +
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4c/Uclaigem2015_spinnersetup.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">A later version of our setup. The glass dish contains the isopropanol bath. The godet is driven by a stepper motor.</figcaption></figure>
 +
<p style = "clear:both;">
  
 +
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/60/Uclaigem2015_closeupofspinnersetup.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">A closeup of our spinner setup. The godet draws the fiber from the bath after it has formed.</figcaption></figure>
 +
<p style = "clear:both;">
  
<!--FIGURES: I DONT KNOW WHERE TO PUT THEM-->
+
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
<div class= "content_subsection">
+
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d0/Uclaigem2015_godetcollection.jpg
<h2>FIGURES: I DON'T KNOW WHERE TO PUT THEM</h2>
+
" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">Closeup of the co-spun silk wound around the godet.</figcaption></figure>
 +
<p style = "clear:both;">
  
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: left;"><img width="500px" src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b9/Fig_1_ICA_Methodology.png" />
+
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
<figcaption style="margin: auto; width: 500px;">
+
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0d/Uclaigem2015_co-spunsilkinthepetridish.jpg
<b>Fig 1:</b>In ICA, the initiator of the growing DNA chains are immobilized on magnetic streptavidin beads to facilitate removal. The first monomer is ligated to the initiator. (Step A) Subsequent ligation steps incorporate capping oligos, which prevent the extension of incorrect chains: those that failed to ligate in the previous round. (Steps B, C) Ligation continues until the construct reaches the final desired length. The final step incorporates a terminator oligo. (Final Step) Only DNA constructs of the correct size can ligate to the terminator, as all incorrect constructs will have been capped.
+
" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
</figcaption>
+
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">Co-spun silk after removing from the godet. A small volume (~500 uL) of dope yields a very long contiguous length of fiber, but in order to remove from the godet without inadvertently stretching the fiber, we had to cut it.</figcaption></figure>
</figure>
+
<p style = "clear:both;">
  
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;"><img width="300px" src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/63/Fig_2_ICA_Cloning.png" />
+
<h4>Measuring fiber diameter and fluorescence</h4>
<figcaption  style="margin: auto; width: 300px;">
+
<p>We used an EVOS light microscope to image the fibers under white light and blue excitation light. We used ImageJ to determine fluorescence of the fiber.</p>
<b>Fig 2:</b>Downstream Cloning after Iterative Capped Assembly. After elution from the beads, the ICA constructs are amplified using PCR primers that anneal to the initiator and the terminator. These primer binding sites are unique in the construct, and can be found nowhere else in the sequence. The only constructs that are amplified are those that have the initiator and terminator. All other constructs, while present, are excluded from amplification. After amplification, the construct can be cloned into a vector using traditional techniques.
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
  
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: left;"><img width="400px" src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/04/Fig_4_Accessory_Oligos.png" />
+
<h4>Testing the composite silk</h4>
<figcaption  style="margin: auto; width: 400px;">
+
<p>We tested our co-spun fibers in an Instron model 5564 table mounted system with a 10kN load cell. To prepare our fibers for testing, we mounted them on cardstock frames with 10 mm gauge length. We then loaded the carded fibers into the Instron with pneumatic grips and cut the sides of the cardstock frame. We then had the machine extend the fiber at a rate of 0.1 mm/min and measure the tensile force of the fiber. </p>
<b>Fig 4:</b>Schematic of examples of  initiator (a), terminator (b), and capping oligos (c), used in our ICA project. The cap shown has the B-type sticky end.
+
</figcaption>
+
</figure>
+
  
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;"><img width="400px" src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/12/Fig_5_Sticky_Ends.png" />
+
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
<figcaption style="margin: auto; width: 400px;">
+
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/36/Uclaigem2015_cardstockframeinstronthingy.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
<b>Fig 5:</b>Schematic of the three types of sticky ends we designed for ICA. Sticky end A is 5’-AGTT-3’. Sticky end B is 5’-TGTC-3’. Sticky end C is 5’-CGTG-3’. An assembled 3-mer construct AB+BC+CA is shown as an example of how these biobricks would be used.
+
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">An example of the frames that we used to prepare the fibers for Instron testing.</figcaption></figure>
</figcaption>
+
<p style = "clear:both;">
</figure>
+
  
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: left;"><img width="600px" src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/ca/9_16_2015_UCLA_ICA_FINAL.jpg" />
+
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
<figcaption style="margin: auto; width: 600px;">
+
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/87/Uclaigem2015_instronexample.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% style= rotate90/></a>
<b>Fig 6:</b>Gel image of constructs we created this summer using ICA. pSB1C3 Plasmids containing the sequence verified construct were digested using XbaI and PstI. Results were run on 1% TAE gel. The expected band size for the pSB1C3 is ~2070. Expected sizes for inserts fragments are indicated on the right hand side.
+
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">Image of the fiber loaded into the Instron</figcaption></figure>
</figcaption>
+
<p style = "clear:both;">
</figure>
+
  
<br/><br/>
+
<h1>Results</h1>
<br/><br/>
+
<h4>Fiber radius</h4>
<br/><br/>
+
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
<br/><br/>
+
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/8c/Uclaigem2015_tamura005_brightfield20x.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
<br/><br/>
+
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">20x magnification of our co-spun fiber.</figcaption></figure>
<br/>
+
<p style = "clear:both;">
 +
<p>We took images along three points on the fiber and used ImageJ to measure the diameter of the fiber at each point. We then averaged the measurements and found the fiber's radius to be 13.9 +/- 0.3 um.</p>
  
</div>
+
<h4>Fiber fluorescence</h4>
 +
<p>We used an EVOS FL digital microscope to take microscopic images of our fibers. Natural silk showed some background fluorescence, but the co-spun fiber with NCSilkGFP had considerably stronger fluorescence, as determined by visual assessment. Unfortunately, we were unable to quantify the difference in fluorescence.</p>
 +
 
 +
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0b/Uclaigem2015_tamura005_fluorescence0x.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">Fluorescence microscopy of the same fiber. 470 nm wavelength excitation light was used at 100% intensity in the EVOS FL digital microscope.</figcaption></figure>
 +
<p style = "clear:both;">
 +
 
 +
<figure style= "margin: 10px; float: right;" align="middle">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0e/Native_jul9_20x_blue_intensity_100.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">For comparison, this is fluorescence microscopy of native Bombyx mori silk. 470 nm wavelength excitation light was used at 100% intensity in the EVOS FL digital microscope.</figcaption></figure>
 +
<p style = "clear:both;">
 +
 
 +
<h4>Fiber Strength</h4>
 +
<figure style= "margin: 10px;" align="middle">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/0c/UCLAiGEM2015_Cospun_StressStrain.png" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">Stress Strain curve for the co-spun silk with NCSilkGFP.</figcaption></figure>
 +
<p style = "clear:both;">
 +
<p>Our fiber had a Young's modulus of 5.39 GPa. The Young's modulus is a measure of the fiber's elasticity. The fiber's ultimate strength, or stress at which failure occurs, was 103.4 +/- 6.6 MPa. The toughness of the fiber, which is the total energy that the fiber absorbed before breaking, was 1.47 megaJoules. The maximum strain, or deformation, that the fiber tolerated before breaking was 2.2% of the original unstressed length (10mm).</p>
 +
<p>Overall, this fiber that we co-spun was extremely stiff and brittle and did not match the properties of natural silk. However, this could be largely attributed to the fact that we did not stretch the fiber after spinning, which is known to be a crucial process that confers silk with much of its natural strength and elasticity.<sup>[3]</sup> It has been determined in the literature that silk reconstituted from silk dopes and stretched to several times its length can have properties matching or even exceeding those of natural silk fibers.<sup>[6]</sup> Stretching is known to cause further formation of beta sheet crystals in the fiber, as well as align them in the same axis which allows them to form more hydrogen bonds with each other, thereby increasing the fiber's overall strength.<sup>[6]</sup> We still need to stretch our co-spun silk after spinning in order to determine if the NCSilkGFP actually interferes with the structure and strength of the reconstituted silk.</p>
 +
 
 +
<figure style= "margin: 10px;" align="middle">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/7/7e/Uclaigem2015_bmorivscospunsilk.jpg" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">Stress Strain curves for the natural B.mori silk and the co-spun silk with NCSilkGFP. It is very clear that our co-spun fiber is vastly inferior to the natural silk in every measure</figcaption></figure>
 +
<p style = "clear:both;">
 +
 
 +
<h1>Methods for Producing Recombinant Silk Films</h1>
 +
<h4>Dialyzing silk to remove ions and prepare for lyophilization</h4>
 +
<p>Following recombinant protein expression and purification, the solution contains many ions and other molecules, which are easily removed by dialysis. We dialyzed the solution in a SnakeSkin tube with 3.5 kDa MWCO against 5mM ammonium bicarbonate for 24 hours with 2 total bath changes. Dialyzing against ammonium bicarbonate also prepares the solution for lyophilization, as ammonium bicarbonate facilitates the sublimation of water in the lyophilizer.<sup>[5]</sup></p>
 +
 
 +
<h4>Lyophilization</h4>
 +
<p>We froze the dialyzed silk solution using liquid nitrogen and then lyophilized the frozen sample in a LabConco FreeZone 4.5-105. Lyophilization allows us to recover all of the protein that was purified, which is around 5 to 8 mg from 1 L of recombinant cell culture.</p>
 +
<figure style= "margin: 10px;" align="middle">
 +
<img src= "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/0/05/Uclaigem2015_lyophilizedsilk.jpg
 +
" width = 50% height = 50% /></a>
 +
<figcaption style="margin: auto;">The lyophilized silk can be seen on the walls of the tube. In this form, the silk is pure and without any solvent.</figcaption></figure>
 +
<p style = "clear:both;">
  
 +
<h4>Dissolving in HFIP</h4>
 +
<p>Very few solvents are capable of dissolving pure silk. HFIP, a highly polar organic solvent, is one of them.<sup>[1]</sup> We dissolved our recombinant silk in HFIP to obtain a dilute silk dope of 5% w/v (50 mg/mL).</p>
  
<br/><br/>
+
 
<br/><br/>
+
<h4>Casting films and water annealing</h4>
<br/><br/>
+
<p>We pipetted 100 uL of silk dope into a small weigh boat and let it dry in a fume hood for 24 hours. We then removed the film from the weigh boat and placed it into a vacuum desiccator along with water in a separate container. Vacuum was then applied to the desiccator, and the film was allowed to anneal for 24 hours. The water annealing process encourages further formation of the silk's secondary structure, giving the film stability in aqueous environments as well as added strength.<sup>[4]</sup></p>
<br/><br/>
+
 
<br/><br/>
+
<h4>Measuring thickness of the film</h4>
<br/>
+
<p>A Vernier micrometer was used to measure the thickness of the film.</p>
 +
 
 +
<h4>Mechanical testing</h4>
 +
<p>Just as with the fibers, strips of the fiber were mounted onto cardstock frames with 10mm gauge lengths. The mounted strips were then loaded into the Instron for testing.</p>
 +
 
 +
<h1>Results for Recombinant Silk Films</h1>
 +
<p>Unfortunately, as of 18 September 2015, we haven't gotten around to assaying the mechanical properties of our silk films yet. Any updates and data obtained after the wiki freeze (18 September 2015) will be uploaded to our <a href="http://openwetware.org/wiki/UCLAiGEM:Notebook/MaterialsProcessing/PostWikiFreeze">team's OpenWetWare page</a>. <b>Please note that any and all data hosted on that page is ineligible for consideration by the iGEM wiki judges.</b>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
</br>
 +
</br>
 +
</br>
 +
</br>
 +
</br>
 +
</br>
 +
</br>
 +
</br>
 +
</br>
 +
</br>
 +
 
 +
<h4>References</h4>
 +
<sup>[1]</sup>Rockwood, D., Preda, R., Yücel, T., Wang, X., Lovett, M., & Kaplan, D. (2011). Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat Protoc Nature Protocols, 1612-1631.
 +
 
 +
<sup>[2]</sup><p>Teulé, F., Cooper, A., Furin, W., Bittencourt, D., Rech, E., Brooks, A., & Lewis, R. (n.d.). A protocol for the production of recombinant spider silk-like proteins for artificial fiber spinning. Nat Protoc Nature Protocols, 341-355.</p>
 +
 
 +
<sup>[3]</sup><p>Albertson, A., Teulé, F., Weber, W., Yarger, J., & Lewis, R. (n.d.). Effects of different post-spin stretching conditions on the mechanical properties of synthetic spider silk fibers. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 225-234.</p>
 +
 
 +
<sup>[4]</sup><p>Hu, X., Shmelev, K., Sun, L., Gil, E., Park, S., Cebe, P., & Kaplan, D. (2011). Regulation of Silk Material Structure by Temperature-Controlled Water Vapor Annealing. BioMacroMolecules, 1686-1696.</p>
 +
 
 +
<sup>[5]</sup><p>Ausubel, F. (1990). Current protocols in molecular biology. New York: Greene Pub. Associates and Wiley-Interscience :.</p>
 +
 
 +
<sup>[6]</sup><p>Albertson, A., Teulé, F., Weber, W., Yarger, J., & Lewis, R. (n.d.). Effects of different post-spin stretching conditions on the mechanical properties of synthetic spider silk fibers. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 225-234.</p>
  
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 04:00, 19 September 2015

iGEM UCLA




























Materials Processing

Background

Abstract

Following genetic design of our constructs, we must express and process them into functional materials. Here, we highlight the methods that we used to take our silks from DNA to proteins and ultimately to fibers and films.

Introduction

To create functionalized fibers, we co-spun the NCSilkGFP with native Bombyx mori silk. The NCSilkGFP was designed such that the N and C termini have affinity to b.mori silk, allowing it to bind to the native silk upon spinning.

Methods for co-spinning silk with the NCSilkGFP

In brief, we followed the standard process as highlighted in the literature [1] to produce a concentrated aqueous solution, or dope, of commercially purchased b.mori silk. We then added aqueous NCSilkGFP to the concentrated b.mori dope so that the final solution had 750 grams of b.mori silk to 1 gram of NCSilkGFP. We then extruded this dope into a coagulation bath of 90% v/v isopropanol and water and collected the resulting fiber on a godet. Detailed steps are as follows:

Degumming

Silk is comprised of two main proteins, fibroin and sericin. Fibroin is the structural protein of the silk and our protein of interest. Sericin serves as the ‘glue’ of the silk. Degumming separates and removes sericin and is an essential preparation step before dissolving the silk. We found that commercially degummed silk was not properly degummed for our purposes and this step had to be carried out in-lab.

To degum, we boiled 2.5 grams of B.mori silk in 0.02M sodium carbonate solution for 30 minutes.

Solubilization

The resilience of silk to many different solvents is well known. In order to dissolve silk, we used lithium bromide, a strong chaotrope[1] that disrupts the hydrogen bonds and thus secondary structure of the silk.

We dissolved our silk in 9.3M LiBr at 60 C for 4 hours.

Silk solubilized in 9.3M lithium bromide.

We dialyzed our silk in SnakeSkin Dialysis Tubing of 3.5 kDa molecular weight cutoff against double deionized water. We dialyzed for 48 hours with a total of 6 dialysis bath changes. Following dialysis, we centrifuged the solution to remove any flocculents and other insoluble proteins.

Concentration Dialysis

The previous dialysis results in an aqueous silk solution with concentration ranging from 4% w/v to 8% w/v (40 - 80 mg/mL). This is too dilute to spin into a fiber, so the solution must be concentrated by dialyzing against a highly concentrated polymer solution. The polymer solution draws water out from the silk solution by osmotic pressure.

To concentrate, we dialyzed 10 mL of aqueous silk solution in a Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassette of 3.5 kDa Molecular weight cutoff against a solution of 10% w/v 10,000 molecular weight PEG for 18 hours. This will yield an aqueous silk solution of 15-18% w/v (150-200 mg/mL) concentration. Dialyzing the solution for too long will overconcentrate the silk dope, which will lead to the silk forming a gel in the cassette. Once a silk has gelled, it is no longer usable in any further processing steps.

19% w/v silk dope after concentration dialysis.

Spiking with the NCSilkGFP

NCSilkGFP was added to the silk dope such that the resulting solution had a 1:750 mass to mass ratio of NCSilkGFP to native B.mori silk.

Spinning the composite silk

In order to form fibers from silk, soluble silk protein solutions must be much like how they are in natural spider spinnerets. The majority of spinning methods entail pushing, or extruding, silk solution through very thin channels. During this extrusion, shear forces on the silk solution cause the amino acids of the proteins to align in a way that allows the strong beta sheets of the silk structure to form. Multiple proteins are similarly aligned, causing separate proteins to interact and form larger structures.[2]

We used a 21 gauge needle to load the silk dope into a 1 mL BD syringe with luer lok. We then replaced the needle with PEEK tubing of 0.127 mm inner diameter. We used a syringe pump to extrude the silk at a rate of 10 uL/min into a coagulation bath of 90% v/v isopropanol and water. After the fiber formed, we drew it out of the bath and wound it around a pair of tweezers that we spun by hand to collect the fiber as it formed. In later iterations of our spinning apparatus, we wound the fiber around a motorized godet to collect the fiber as it formed in order to automate the process. We designed the godet in OpenSCAD and 3D printed it in a Stratasys UPrint SE.

An early iteration of our silk spinning setup where we wound our fibers by hand around a pair of tweezers.
A later version of our setup. The glass dish contains the isopropanol bath. The godet is driven by a stepper motor.

A closeup of our spinner setup. The godet draws the fiber from the bath after it has formed.

Closeup of the co-spun silk wound around the godet.

Co-spun silk after removing from the godet. A small volume (~500 uL) of dope yields a very long contiguous length of fiber, but in order to remove from the godet without inadvertently stretching the fiber, we had to cut it.

Measuring fiber diameter and fluorescence

We used an EVOS light microscope to image the fibers under white light and blue excitation light. We used ImageJ to determine fluorescence of the fiber.

Testing the composite silk

We tested our co-spun fibers in an Instron model 5564 table mounted system with a 10kN load cell. To prepare our fibers for testing, we mounted them on cardstock frames with 10 mm gauge length. We then loaded the carded fibers into the Instron with pneumatic grips and cut the sides of the cardstock frame. We then had the machine extend the fiber at a rate of 0.1 mm/min and measure the tensile force of the fiber.

An example of the frames that we used to prepare the fibers for Instron testing.

Image of the fiber loaded into the Instron

Results

Fiber radius

20x magnification of our co-spun fiber.

We took images along three points on the fiber and used ImageJ to measure the diameter of the fiber at each point. We then averaged the measurements and found the fiber's radius to be 13.9 +/- 0.3 um.

Fiber fluorescence

We used an EVOS FL digital microscope to take microscopic images of our fibers. Natural silk showed some background fluorescence, but the co-spun fiber with NCSilkGFP had considerably stronger fluorescence, as determined by visual assessment. Unfortunately, we were unable to quantify the difference in fluorescence.

Fluorescence microscopy of the same fiber. 470 nm wavelength excitation light was used at 100% intensity in the EVOS FL digital microscope.

For comparison, this is fluorescence microscopy of native Bombyx mori silk. 470 nm wavelength excitation light was used at 100% intensity in the EVOS FL digital microscope.

Fiber Strength

Stress Strain curve for the co-spun silk with NCSilkGFP.

Our fiber had a Young's modulus of 5.39 GPa. The Young's modulus is a measure of the fiber's elasticity. The fiber's ultimate strength, or stress at which failure occurs, was 103.4 +/- 6.6 MPa. The toughness of the fiber, which is the total energy that the fiber absorbed before breaking, was 1.47 megaJoules. The maximum strain, or deformation, that the fiber tolerated before breaking was 2.2% of the original unstressed length (10mm).

Overall, this fiber that we co-spun was extremely stiff and brittle and did not match the properties of natural silk. However, this could be largely attributed to the fact that we did not stretch the fiber after spinning, which is known to be a crucial process that confers silk with much of its natural strength and elasticity.[3] It has been determined in the literature that silk reconstituted from silk dopes and stretched to several times its length can have properties matching or even exceeding those of natural silk fibers.[6] Stretching is known to cause further formation of beta sheet crystals in the fiber, as well as align them in the same axis which allows them to form more hydrogen bonds with each other, thereby increasing the fiber's overall strength.[6] We still need to stretch our co-spun silk after spinning in order to determine if the NCSilkGFP actually interferes with the structure and strength of the reconstituted silk.

Stress Strain curves for the natural B.mori silk and the co-spun silk with NCSilkGFP. It is very clear that our co-spun fiber is vastly inferior to the natural silk in every measure

Methods for Producing Recombinant Silk Films

Dialyzing silk to remove ions and prepare for lyophilization

Following recombinant protein expression and purification, the solution contains many ions and other molecules, which are easily removed by dialysis. We dialyzed the solution in a SnakeSkin tube with 3.5 kDa MWCO against 5mM ammonium bicarbonate for 24 hours with 2 total bath changes. Dialyzing against ammonium bicarbonate also prepares the solution for lyophilization, as ammonium bicarbonate facilitates the sublimation of water in the lyophilizer.[5]

Lyophilization

We froze the dialyzed silk solution using liquid nitrogen and then lyophilized the frozen sample in a LabConco FreeZone 4.5-105. Lyophilization allows us to recover all of the protein that was purified, which is around 5 to 8 mg from 1 L of recombinant cell culture.

The lyophilized silk can be seen on the walls of the tube. In this form, the silk is pure and without any solvent.

Dissolving in HFIP

Very few solvents are capable of dissolving pure silk. HFIP, a highly polar organic solvent, is one of them.[1] We dissolved our recombinant silk in HFIP to obtain a dilute silk dope of 5% w/v (50 mg/mL).

Casting films and water annealing

We pipetted 100 uL of silk dope into a small weigh boat and let it dry in a fume hood for 24 hours. We then removed the film from the weigh boat and placed it into a vacuum desiccator along with water in a separate container. Vacuum was then applied to the desiccator, and the film was allowed to anneal for 24 hours. The water annealing process encourages further formation of the silk's secondary structure, giving the film stability in aqueous environments as well as added strength.[4]

Measuring thickness of the film

A Vernier micrometer was used to measure the thickness of the film.

Mechanical testing

Just as with the fibers, strips of the fiber were mounted onto cardstock frames with 10mm gauge lengths. The mounted strips were then loaded into the Instron for testing.

Results for Recombinant Silk Films

Unfortunately, as of 18 September 2015, we haven't gotten around to assaying the mechanical properties of our silk films yet. Any updates and data obtained after the wiki freeze (18 September 2015) will be uploaded to our team's OpenWetWare page. Please note that any and all data hosted on that page is ineligible for consideration by the iGEM wiki judges.









References

[1]Rockwood, D., Preda, R., Yücel, T., Wang, X., Lovett, M., & Kaplan, D. (2011). Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat Protoc Nature Protocols, 1612-1631. [2]

Teulé, F., Cooper, A., Furin, W., Bittencourt, D., Rech, E., Brooks, A., & Lewis, R. (n.d.). A protocol for the production of recombinant spider silk-like proteins for artificial fiber spinning. Nat Protoc Nature Protocols, 341-355.

[3]

Albertson, A., Teulé, F., Weber, W., Yarger, J., & Lewis, R. (n.d.). Effects of different post-spin stretching conditions on the mechanical properties of synthetic spider silk fibers. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 225-234.

[4]

Hu, X., Shmelev, K., Sun, L., Gil, E., Park, S., Cebe, P., & Kaplan, D. (2011). Regulation of Silk Material Structure by Temperature-Controlled Water Vapor Annealing. BioMacroMolecules, 1686-1696.

[5]

Ausubel, F. (1990). Current protocols in molecular biology. New York: Greene Pub. Associates and Wiley-Interscience :.

[6]

Albertson, A., Teulé, F., Weber, W., Yarger, J., & Lewis, R. (n.d.). Effects of different post-spin stretching conditions on the mechanical properties of synthetic spider silk fibers. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 225-234.