Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/StreetScience"
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <h2>Conclusion</h3> | ||
| + | <p>All in all, it was a successful day. We could fascinate children for science and got to bring people closer to our project. Our project was received very well. Through the survey we could confirm that the detection of heavy metals would be nice to check in tap water. Some requirements for biosensors like easiness, low cost and reliability are needed which we wanted to implement for our biosensors, too. Most respondents would use them as long as it is fast and cell-free. That confirmed us in developing cell-free systems. </p> | ||
Revision as of 13:43, 15 September 2015
Street Science
We set up a booth in downtown to reach out to the public.
Street science is an event organized by Bielefeld Marketing which takes place three times a year in downtown Bielefeld. The aim of this event is to communicate science to the public.
We participated in this event on April 4th 2015, a Sunday open for business, from 12 am till 6 pm. It was the first time we presented our topic and team in the public. Therefore, we had created posters about synthetic biology, the iGEM competition and our topic. As it was very crowded, we got into conversation with many people and informed them about problems with drinking water and what we want to do about the problems.
We also explained what synthetic biology is and where you can find products from genetically engineered organisms in everyday life. To evoke enthusiasm for science in children, we offered several small experiments. The most popular experiment was the DNA isolation. With simple household objects like salt, rubbing alcohol and dish detergents, children could extract DNA out of fruits such as bananas and kiwis. Of course, parents and we supervised them in experimenting. For younger children we offered chromatography with filter paper and creating ink images by pipetting ink onto sugar cubes in water. As a gift, we sent them the images and let them take the chromatograms. For adults, we had prepared a set of memory cards with images of products and the corresponding production organism to show them where they are in contact with biotechnological products in their everyday life. As genetic engineering is a controversial issue in Germany, we tried to lower concerns by outlining the facts about this topic in a small presentation. As a highlight, we created a chemical garden every two hours by adding metal salts to a solution of sodium silicate. By doing so, the salt seem to grow in form of plants.
As we had already decided to focus on water analytics at that time, we did a survey to find out which water contaminants are most important to people and which requirements they have regarding a biosensor. More than 60 people filled out our questionnaire. Although the results are obviously not representative, they were an interesting insight and helped us in defining in which direction we wanted to go with our project.
Survey
We asked people to name the substances they would like to have a sensor for. The most frequent answer was heavy metals, which showed us that this is even in Germany a relevant problem to tackle. A lot of people were also concerned about drug residues, but after some research, we decided against including them in our sensor. However, we tried to make our test strips easily extensible so that other contaminants can be incorporated in the future.
From the beginning on it was very important to us to develop a biosensor that can be used outside the lab. Therefore, we asked which requirements people have with regard to such a sensor. The results showed us that our biosensor needs to be simple, cheap and reliable.
When it came to concerns regarding whole-cell biosensors, people were divided approximately fifty-fifty. However, many people would use them despite their apprehension.
Biosensors without live cells were viewed more positively. This confirmed us in developing cell-free biosensors.
Most people will only use a biosensor if it is very fast. We believe that cell-free approaches can be superior in this respect.
Every fourth respondent said they did not know enough about synthetic biology to form an opinion. We hope that by providing information and taking science out of the lab, we were able to contribute to a positive reputation of synthetic biology.
Conclusion
All in all, it was a successful day. We could fascinate children for science and got to bring people closer to our project. Our project was received very well. Through the survey we could confirm that the detection of heavy metals would be nice to check in tap water. Some requirements for biosensors like easiness, low cost and reliability are needed which we wanted to implement for our biosensors, too. Most respondents would use them as long as it is fast and cell-free. That confirmed us in developing cell-free systems.