Difference between revisions of "Team:UCSC/Safety"
Line 256: | Line 256: | ||
<h1> Safety</h2> | <h1> Safety</h2> | ||
− | <p> | + | <h2><b>Development</b></h2> |
+ | <p style="text-align: left;"> | ||
+ | We considered the autonomy of organisms such as H. Volcanii, intellectual property and patent agreements, GMO ownership, reasons for and against biofuel development, the ethics of biofuel use, and our role in the development of the next generation of biofuels. | ||
+ | For interactions with any life form, there is the question of autonomy. In our project, we will be using H. Volcanii for a purpose other than what it performs in nature. We determined that it is not a violation of autonomy because cells are incapable of sentience and autonomy. | ||
+ | Another aspect of development we looked into is GMO ownership. Current US patent laws dictate that no species or product naturally occurring can be legally owned. While this allows for the patenting of GMOs, it is not always best to do so. We determined that the potential usefulness and inevitable release of a fuel-producing archaea makes ownership of it unethical and ultimately impossible. | ||
+ | And always, safety first. H. Volcanii was chosen because it requires a high salt environment to survive, it only survives in a solution up to 2% butanol, and, as an archaea, it is fundamentally different from bacteria and other natural microbes, so dangerous gene transfer is not a concern. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h2><b>Project</b></h2> | ||
+ | <p style="text-align: left;"> | ||
+ | When we focused on the product itself, we must consider carbon source, geopolitics, safety, and distribution. | ||
+ | The proposed plants we will use are Arundo Donax and switchgrass, both of which grow quickly and in a variety of terrains. Growing large amounts of these plants as biomass for biofuel would enable a cycle of rapidly capturing and releasing recent carbon - in effect, carbon neutrality. | ||
+ | Geopolitical concerns arise when it is brought up that in order to support the world’s energy usage on biobutanol alone, the area required to grow the plants would be the size of South America. | ||
+ | Distribution of responsibility would also have to be talked about as countries may be specialized toward certain aspects of the process, such as possessing ideal land for growing the plants, having plentiful factories to process the biomass into butanol, and various other tasks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<table border="1"? | <table border="1"? | ||
<tr> | <tr> |
Revision as of 20:26, 16 September 2015
Safety
Development
We considered the autonomy of organisms such as H. Volcanii, intellectual property and patent agreements, GMO ownership, reasons for and against biofuel development, the ethics of biofuel use, and our role in the development of the next generation of biofuels. For interactions with any life form, there is the question of autonomy. In our project, we will be using H. Volcanii for a purpose other than what it performs in nature. We determined that it is not a violation of autonomy because cells are incapable of sentience and autonomy. Another aspect of development we looked into is GMO ownership. Current US patent laws dictate that no species or product naturally occurring can be legally owned. While this allows for the patenting of GMOs, it is not always best to do so. We determined that the potential usefulness and inevitable release of a fuel-producing archaea makes ownership of it unethical and ultimately impossible. And always, safety first. H. Volcanii was chosen because it requires a high salt environment to survive, it only survives in a solution up to 2% butanol, and, as an archaea, it is fundamentally different from bacteria and other natural microbes, so dangerous gene transfer is not a concern.
Project
When we focused on the product itself, we must consider carbon source, geopolitics, safety, and distribution. The proposed plants we will use are Arundo Donax and switchgrass, both of which grow quickly and in a variety of terrains. Growing large amounts of these plants as biomass for biofuel would enable a cycle of rapidly capturing and releasing recent carbon - in effect, carbon neutrality. Geopolitical concerns arise when it is brought up that in order to support the world’s energy usage on biobutanol alone, the area required to grow the plants would be the size of South America. Distribution of responsibility would also have to be talked about as countries may be specialized toward certain aspects of the process, such as possessing ideal land for growing the plants, having plentiful factories to process the biomass into butanol, and various other tasks.