Difference between revisions of "Team:UNITN-Trento/Test"

m
m
Line 58: Line 58:
 
<div class="4u 12u(narrower)">
 
<div class="4u 12u(narrower)">
 
<div href="#" class="wow zoomIn rotate-box square-icon">
 
<div href="#" class="wow zoomIn rotate-box square-icon">
<span class="rotate-box-icon"><i class="faa flaticon-newspaper11"></i></span>
+
<span class="rotate-box-icon"><i class="faa flaticon-uparrow5"></i></span>
<div class="rotate-box-info">
+
<h4>Clear Data and Protocols</h4>
+
<p>We listed in the &rdquo;InterLab Study&rdquo; page:
+
<ul class="arrowed">
+
<li>All devices measured for this study</li>
+
<li>All protocols developed and adopted</li>
+
<li>Sequencing data for all measurements devices</li>
+
</ul>
+
</p>
+
</div>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>  
 
</div>  
 
 
<div class="4u 12u(narrower)">
 
<div href="#" class="wow zoomIn delay02 rotate-box square-icon">
 
<span class="rotate-box-icon"><i class="faa flaticon-tools6"></i></span>
 
<div class="rotate-box-info">
 
<h4><span>3</span> BioBrick devices</h4>
 
<p>We used the three BioBrick devices listed in the &rdquo;Required Devices&rdquo; section.</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="4u 12u(narrower)">
 
<div href="#" class="wow zoomIn delay05 rotate-box square-icon">
 
<span class="rotate-box-icon"><i class="faa flaticon-microscope23"></i></span>
 
<div class="rotate-box-info">
 
<h4><span> 5</span> techniques </h4>
 
<p>We used <span class="i_enph italic">in-vivo</span> and <span class="i_enph italic">in-vitro</span> techniques for measuring RNA and protein levels:
 
<ul class="arrowed">
 
<li>Plate Reader</li>
 
<li>Spectrofluorometer</li>
 
<li>Flow Cytometer</li>
 
<li>RT-qPCR</li>
 
<li>Cell-Free Extract</li>
 
</ul>
 
</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
<div class="row">
 
<div class="4u 12u(narrower)">
 
<div href="#" class="wow zoomIn rotate-box square-icon">
 
<span class="rotate-box-icon"><i class="faa flaticon-increasing5"></i></span>
 
<div class="rotate-box-info">
 
<h4> Statistical Reliability </h4>
 
<p>We have three biological replicates for each measurement, with positive and negative controls</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
<div class="4u 12u(narrower)">
 
<div href="#" class="wow zoomIn delay02 rotate-box square-icon">
 
<span class="rotate-box-icon"><i class="faa flaticon-lists10"></i></span>
 
<div class="rotate-box-info">
 
<h4>Worksheet and Protocol</h4>
 
<p>We completed the InterLab Worksheet and the InterLab Protocol</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div class="4u 12u(narrower)">
 
  <div href="#" class="wow zoomIn delay05 rotate-box square-icon">
 
<span class="rotate-box-icon"><i class="faa flaticon-lab2"></i></span>
 
<div class="rotate-box-info">
 
<h4>Extra Credit Assignment</h4>
 
<p>We did technical replicates for each sample</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
 
 
 

Revision as of 02:11, 17 September 2015

InterLab Measurement Study

What happens when GFP meets different promoters? Are they all the same? Here is what we found out!

  • Introduction & Achievements

  • Experimental Design

  • Experiments& Protocols

  • Final Discussion & Results

The Interlab Measurement Study

The characterization of standard parts has always been one of the main concerns in Synthetic Biology. For this very same reason, iGEM teams from all around the World were suggested to take part in the biggest measurement study ever conducted and the 2015 UNITN-Trento iGEM team answered the call. The goal of this Second International Measurement Interlab Study is to assemble three different devices, each one containing a promoter with a screening plasmid intermediate and collect as many fluorescence data as possible. iGEM teams are free to use any technique to measure their devices as long the obtained data are solid and reproducible.