Difference between revisions of "Team:HUST-China/InterLab Study"
(41 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
} | } | ||
table tr,th,td{ width: auto; | table tr,th,td{ width: auto; | ||
+ | font-size:12px; | ||
padding: 5px; | padding: 5px; | ||
text-align: center;} | text-align: center;} | ||
Line 88: | Line 89: | ||
z-index:1;} | z-index:1;} | ||
− | + | .first-menu{float: left; | |
− | + | ||
font-size:19px; | font-size:19px; | ||
− | max-width: | + | max-width: 20%; |
− | padding-top:5px | + | padding-top:5px;} |
− | + | ||
.other-menu{float: left; | .other-menu{float: left; | ||
− | margin-left:1 | + | margin-left:1%; |
font-size:19px; | font-size:19px; | ||
− | max-width: | + | max-width: 20%; |
− | padding-top:5px; | + | padding-top:5px;} |
− | + | ||
.navbar .nav > li .dropdown-menu {margin: 0;} | .navbar .nav > li .dropdown-menu {margin: 0;} | ||
Line 127: | Line 126: | ||
− | #pic{ background-image: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/ | + | #pic{ background-image: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d1/HUST_wetlab.jpg); |
width:1349px; | width:1349px; | ||
height:650px; | height:650px; | ||
Line 143: | Line 142: | ||
} | } | ||
.pic_a{float: left; | .pic_a{float: left; | ||
− | margin-top: | + | margin-top:50px; |
width: 1349px; | width: 1349px; | ||
text-align:center; | text-align:center; | ||
Line 232: | Line 231: | ||
<!--悬浮菜单--> | <!--悬浮菜单--> | ||
+ | <!--悬浮菜单--> | ||
<div class="navbar"> | <div class="navbar"> | ||
<div class="navbar-inner"> | <div class="navbar-inner"> | ||
Line 238: | Line 238: | ||
<li class="first-menu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China">HOME</a> | <li class="first-menu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China">HOME</a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/ | + | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Project">PROJECT<b class="caret"></b></a> |
<ul class="dropdown-menu"> | <ul class="dropdown-menu"> | ||
<li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Background">Background</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Background">Background</a></li> | ||
Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/ | + | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Wetlab">WETLAB<b class="caret"></b></a> |
<ul class="dropdown-menu"> | <ul class="dropdown-menu"> | ||
<li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Results">Results</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Results">Results</a></li> | ||
Line 260: | Line 260: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/ | + | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Parts">PARTS<b class="caret"></b></a> |
<ul class="dropdown-menu"> | <ul class="dropdown-menu"> | ||
<li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Basic_part">Basic Parts</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Basic_part">Basic Parts</a></li> | ||
<li class="divider"></li> | <li class="divider"></li> | ||
− | <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Basic_part#2">Composite Parts</a></li> | + | <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Basic_part#2">Composite Parts</a></li> <li class="divider"></li> |
+ | <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Part_Collection">Part Collection</a></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 270: | Line 271: | ||
<li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Modeling">MODELING<b class="caret"></b></a> | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Modeling">MODELING<b class="caret"></b></a> | ||
<ul class="dropdown-menu"> | <ul class="dropdown-menu"> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Modeling">Overiew</a></li> | ||
+ | <li class="divider"></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Modeling on Cellular Level">Modeling on Cellular Level</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Modeling on Cellular Level">Modeling on Cellular Level</a></li> | ||
<li class="divider"></li> | <li class="divider"></li> | ||
Line 277: | Line 280: | ||
− | + | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Practices">HUMAN PRACTICES</a> | |
− | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"> | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
− | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"> | + | <li class="dropdown other-menu" id="accountmenu"><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Safety">OTHERS<b class="caret"></b></a> |
− | + | ||
<ul class="dropdown-menu"> | <ul class="dropdown-menu"> | ||
<li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Safety">Safety</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:HUST-China/Safety">Safety</a></li> | ||
Line 307: | Line 307: | ||
<!--标题栏--> | <!--标题栏--> | ||
<div id="pic" > | <div id="pic" > | ||
− | <img class="title" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/ | + | <img class="title" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f0/HUST_WETLAB_4.PNG"/> |
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <div class="pic_a" > | + | <div class="pic_a" > |
+ | <h4 align="center" style="color:white"><b>click it~</b></h4> | ||
<img style="cursor:pointer;" id="to_des" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/80/White.png"/> | <img style="cursor:pointer;" id="to_des" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/8/80/White.png"/> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 318: | Line 319: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/da/Maodian.png" > | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/da/Maodian.png" > | ||
<ul class="ul" > | <ul class="ul" > | ||
− | <li class="li"><a href="#1" class="btn btn-default btn-lg"> | + | <li class="li"><a href="#1" class="btn btn-default btn-lg">Introduction</a></li> |
− | <li class="li"><a href="#2" class="btn btn-default btn-lg"> | + | <li class="li"><a href="#2" class="btn btn-default btn-lg">Provenance and Release</a></li> |
− | <li class="li"><a href="#3" class="btn btn-default btn-lg"> | + | <li class="li"><a href="#3" class="btn btn-default btn-lg">Equipment Information</a></li> |
− | <li class="li"><a href="#4" class="btn btn-default btn-lg"> | + | <li class="li"><a href="#4" class="btn btn-default btn-lg">Protocol</a></li> |
+ | <li class="li"><a href="#5" class="btn btn-default btn-lg">Results</a></li> | ||
+ | <li class="li"><a href="#6" class="btn btn-default btn-lg">Appendix</a></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 327: | Line 330: | ||
<!--描述,只在这里编写,其他内容都不动,但最后要整个copy--> | <!--描述,只在这里编写,其他内容都不动,但最后要整个copy--> | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <h1 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Interlab Study</b></h2><br><br><br> |
− | < | + | <div class="description"><a name="1"></a><br><div class="dongxi"></div> |
+ | <h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> SectionⅠ: Introduction </b></h3> | ||
<p> This year, iGEM invited and encouraged all teams to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology. We were required to measure the expression level of GFP when using three different promoters. Although It was the first time for our team to take part in Interlab Study, we successfully conducted the experiment and obtained the fluorescence data. Now, we are hoping that we can make contributions to Interlab Study. | <p> This year, iGEM invited and encouraged all teams to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology. We were required to measure the expression level of GFP when using three different promoters. Although It was the first time for our team to take part in Interlab Study, we successfully conducted the experiment and obtained the fluorescence data. Now, we are hoping that we can make contributions to Interlab Study. | ||
</p><br><br><br> | </p><br><br><br> | ||
− | < | + | </div> |
− | < | + | |
+ | <div class="description"><a name="2"></a><br><div class="dongxi"></div> | ||
+ | <h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅱ: Provenance and Release</b></h3> | ||
+ | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study:</b></h4> | ||
<p> Create the devices: Zhi Zeng | <p> Create the devices: Zhi Zeng | ||
Conduct measurements: Guozhao Wu, Shuyan Tang and Zhi Zeng | Conduct measurements: Guozhao Wu, Shuyan Tang and Zhi Zeng | ||
Process data: Shuyan Tang and Yee Zhan | Process data: Shuyan Tang and Yee Zhan | ||
− | </p | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Date of InterLab Study:</b></h4> | |
− | + | ||
<p> The measurement was obtained on August 27, 2015. | <p> The measurement was obtained on August 27, 2015. | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Did your team participate in the Extra Credit?</b></h4> | |
− | + | ||
<p> No. | <p> No. | ||
(Details can be found here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/Interlab_study) | (Details can be found here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/Interlab_study) | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Do all persons involved consent to the inclusion of this data in publications derived from the iGEM interlab study?</b></h4> | |
− | < | + | |
<p> Yes. | <p> Yes. | ||
− | </p | + | </p><br><br><br> |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <div class="description"><a name="3"></a><br><div class="dongxi"></div> | |
+ | <h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅲ: Equipment Information </b></h2> | ||
+ | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What type of incubator did you use to grow your cells?</b></h3> | ||
<p> THZ-D desktop constant temperature oscillator | <p> THZ-D desktop constant temperature oscillator | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> If known, what was your incubator's throw (shaking diameter)?</b></h3> | |
− | < | + | <p> Oscillation frequency: 20~350rpm</p> |
− | <p> Oscillation frequency: 20~350rpm | + | <p>Amplitude: 26mm</p> |
− | Amplitude: 26mm | + | <p>Maximum capacity(each layer): 1000mlx6 or 500mlx9 or 250mlx12</p> |
− | Maximum capacity(each layer): 1000mlx6 or 500mlx9 or 250mlx12 | + | <p>Standard configuration: Spring rack</p> |
− | Standard configuration: Spring rack | + | <p>Dimension of the tray (mm): 400x340</p> |
− | Dimension of the tray (mm): 400x340 | + | <p>Time range: 0~999minutes</p> |
− | Time range: 0~999minutes | + | <p>Control temperature: (Environment temperature)Room temp+5℃~60℃</p> |
− | Control temperature: (Environment temperature)Room temp+5℃~60℃ | + | <p>Temperature increment: 0.1℃</p> |
− | Temperature increment: 0.1℃ | + | <p>Inner temperature error: ±0.5℃</p> |
− | Inner temperature error: ±0.5℃ | + | <p>Display: LED</p> |
− | Display: LED | + | <p>Input power: 350w</p> |
− | Input power: 350w | + | <p>Size (mm): 650x500x480</p><br> |
− | Size (mm): 650x500x480 | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What piece of equipment did you use to measure the devices?</b></h4> |
− | </p> | + | |
− | + | ||
− | < | + | |
<p> FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader | <p> FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> When was this equipment last calibrated?</b></h4> | |
− | < | + | <p> August 1st, 2015</p><br> |
− | <p> August 1st, 2015</p> | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Who calibrated the equipment?</b></h4> |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | |
<p> Tengteng Gong | <p> Tengteng Gong | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What was the wavelength of light you used to excite the cells?</b></h4> | |
− | < | + | |
<p> 485nm | <p> 485nm | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What was the filter/channel you used to capture the light emission from the cells?</b></h4> | |
− | < | + | |
<p> Monochromators, tunable in 1.0 nm increments Wavelength range 400–750 nm | <p> Monochromators, tunable in 1.0 nm increments Wavelength range 400–750 nm | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> What was the sampling frequency?</b></h4> | |
− | < | + | |
<p>50 times per second | <p>50 times per second | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br><br><br> |
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <div class="description"><a name="4"></a><br><div class="dongxi"></div> | |
+ | <h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅳ: Protocol </b></h3> | ||
+ | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Did you fill in the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?</b></h4> | ||
<p> Yes | <p> Yes | ||
(The InterLab Protocol is provided here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/InterLab_Protocol) | (The InterLab Protocol is provided here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/InterLab_Protocol) | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Did you follow the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?</b></h4> | |
− | + | ||
− | < | + | |
<p> Yes | <p> Yes | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> How did you determine the final dataset that you are reporting?</b></h4> | |
− | < | + | |
<p> Since theoretically the emission wavelength of GFP is up to 518nm and the test data showed 518nm got the peak signal, we chose Em518 data. We also tested LB medium as blank and the data was minus the blank. | <p> Since theoretically the emission wavelength of GFP is up to 518nm and the test data showed 518nm got the peak signal, we chose Em518 data. We also tested LB medium as blank and the data was minus the blank. | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br><br><br> |
− | <h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> | + | </div> |
+ | <div class="description"><a name="5"></a><br><div class="dongxi"></div> | ||
+ | <h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅴ: Measurement results for Interlab Study</b></h3> | ||
+ | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Units Reported:</b></h4> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
− | <p> RFUs </p> | + | <p> RFUs </p><br> |
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> We measured the three specific devices required by Interlab Study, using E.coli DH5α as our chassis.</b></h4> | |
− | < | + | <p>1.Device 1: BBa_J23101 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone</p> |
− | 1.Device 1: BBa_J23101 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone | + | <p>2.Device 2: BBa_J23106 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone</p> |
− | 2.Device 2: BBa_J23106 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone | + | <p>3.Device 3: BBa_J23117 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone</p><br> |
− | 3.Device 3: BBa_J23117 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone | + | |
− | </p> | + | |
<p> We diluted each of our samples to an OD600 of 0.5 and we started measuring fluorescence when OD600 was within 5% of 0.5. We measured each sample in biological triplicates. | <p> We diluted each of our samples to an OD600 of 0.5 and we started measuring fluorescence when OD600 was within 5% of 0.5. We measured each sample in biological triplicates. | ||
− | </p> | + | </p><br> |
<p> We obtained the fluorescence data by using 485nm as the excitation wavelength and 518nm as the emission wavelength. Measurement data were collected as relative fluorescence units. | <p> We obtained the fluorescence data by using 485nm as the excitation wavelength and 518nm as the emission wavelength. Measurement data were collected as relative fluorescence units. | ||
+ | </p><br> | ||
+ | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Final fluorescence data were collected on August 27, 2015.</b></h4> | ||
+ | <p> We divided fluorescence by relevant OD600 and used the results to draw the graph above. According to the graph, all the samples seemed to be normal except Device3: J23117+I13504. Sadly Device3 didn’t express GFP while Device1 had the highest fluorescence intensity, revealing that J23101 is a relative high strength promoter compared with J23106 and J23117. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> The fluorescence results that we submitted to Interlab Study are below:</b></h4> | ||
+ | <p> All the data below has been minus our blank control, LB medium.</p> | ||
+ | <table border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th> | ||
+ | </th> | ||
+ | <th> The First Replicate </th> | ||
+ | <th> The Second Replicate </th> | ||
+ | <th> The Third Replicate </th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Positive Control: BBa_I20270 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 1346.963 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 1640.876 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 1265.491 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Negative Control:BBa_K950001</td> | ||
+ | <td> -58.27 </td> | ||
+ | <td> -63.088 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2.847 </td> | ||
+ | </tr</table> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <table border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th> Sample</th> | ||
+ | <th> Biological Replicate 1 </th> | ||
+ | <th> Biological Replicate 2 </th> | ||
+ | <th> Biological Replicate 3 </th> | ||
+ | <th> Mean </th> | ||
+ | <th> Standard Deviation </th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Device 1: BBa_J23101+ BBa_I13504 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 4737.16</td> | ||
+ | <td> 4864.736 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 4715.018 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 4772.305 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 120.498 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Device 2: BBa_J23106+ BBa_I13504 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 1271.075</td> | ||
+ | <td> 860.502 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 1581.901 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 1237.826 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 299.201 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Device 3: BBa_J23117+ BBa_I13504 </td> | ||
+ | <td> -31.803</td> | ||
+ | <td> -28.755 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 51.543 </td> | ||
+ | <td> -3.005 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 50.803 </td> | ||
+ | </tr></table> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <img class="picture" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/53/HUST_interlab_Fig_1.jpg | ||
+ | "> | ||
+ | <p>We divided fluorescence by relevant OD600 and used the results to draw the graph above. According to the graph, all the samples seemed to be normal except Device3: J23117+I13504. Sadly Device3 didn’t express GFP while Device1 had the highest fluorescence intensity, revealing that J23101 is a relative high strength promoter compared with J23106 and J23117.</p><br> <br><br><br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="description"><a name="6"></a><br><div class="dongxi"></div> | ||
+ | <h3 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Section Ⅵ: Appendix </b></h3> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | <h4 style="color:black" align="left"><b> Raw data or our fluorescence measurement</b></h4> | |
− | < | + | <table border="1" style="width:750px;height:auto;margin-left:0"> |
− | + | <tr> | |
+ | <th> Raw Data Collected<br>(Exciation Wavelength:485nm<br>Emission Wavelength:518nm) </th> | ||
+ | <th colspan="3"> Test Sample 1</th> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <th> Sample 1 Average </th> | ||
+ | <th colspan="3"> Test Sample 2</th> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <th> Sample 2 Average </th> | ||
+ | <th colspan="3"> Test Sample 3</th> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <th> Sample 3 Average </th> | ||
+ | <th> Average </th> | ||
+ | <th> Standard Deviation </th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> LB Blank </td> | ||
+ | <td> 956.328 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 835.504 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 924.036 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 905.289 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 902.121 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 930.765 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 888.7 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 907.195 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 844.124 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 885.305 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 841.321 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 856.917 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 889.800 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 40.598 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> DH5α</td> | ||
+ | <td> 778.104 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 789.447 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 777.712 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 781.754 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 782.342 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 779.524 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 783.974 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 781.947 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 778.284 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 781.927 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 772.937 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 777.716 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 780.472 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 4.398 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Positive Control: BBa_I20270</td> | ||
+ | <td> 2550.953 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2086.728 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2119.077 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2252.253 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2805.108</td> | ||
+ | <td> 2403.488 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2435.617 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2548.071 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2326.168 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2015.191 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2025.865 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2122.408 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2307.577 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 254.267 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Negative Control:BBa_K950001 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 886.838</td> | ||
+ | <td> 800.389 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 853.831 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 847.019 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 849.775</td> | ||
+ | <td> 807.333 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 875.214 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 844.107 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 911.623 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 792.095 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 875.574</td> | ||
+ | <td> 859.764 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 850.297 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 39.571 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Device 1: J23101+I13504 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 5833.139</td> | ||
+ | <td> 5335.268 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 5758.94</td> | ||
+ | <td> 5642.449 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 5769.227</td> | ||
+ | <td> 5756.32 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 5790.246 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 5771.931 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 5569.237 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 5556.323 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 5590.245</td> | ||
+ | <td> 5571.935 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 5662.105 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 151.731 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Device 2: J23106+I13504 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2253.464</td> | ||
+ | <td> 2154.885 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2120.743</td> | ||
+ | <td> 2176.364 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 1776.392</td> | ||
+ | <td> 1715.65 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 1811.049 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 1767.697 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2448.247 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2432.939 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2435.268</td> | ||
+ | <td> 2438.818 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 2127.626 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 279.005 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> Device 3: J23117+I13504</td> | ||
+ | <td> 893.595</td> | ||
+ | <td> 801.261 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 925.602</td> | ||
+ | <td> 873.486 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 894.7</td> | ||
+ | <td> 858.503</td> | ||
+ | <td> 882.117 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 878.440 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 941.186 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 884.084</td> | ||
+ | <td> 900.11</td> | ||
+ | <td> 908.460 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 886.795 </td> | ||
+ | <td> 37.854 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Latest revision as of 15:37, 18 September 2015
click it~
Interlab Study
SectionⅠ: Introduction
This year, iGEM invited and encouraged all teams to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology. We were required to measure the expression level of GFP when using three different promoters. Although It was the first time for our team to take part in Interlab Study, we successfully conducted the experiment and obtained the fluorescence data. Now, we are hoping that we can make contributions to Interlab Study.
Section Ⅱ: Provenance and Release
Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study:
Create the devices: Zhi Zeng
Conduct measurements: Guozhao Wu, Shuyan Tang and Zhi Zeng
Process data: Shuyan Tang and Yee Zhan
Date of InterLab Study:
The measurement was obtained on August 27, 2015.
Did your team participate in the Extra Credit?
No.
(Details can be found here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/Interlab_study)
Do all persons involved consent to the inclusion of this data in publications derived from the iGEM interlab study?
Yes.
Section Ⅲ: Equipment Information
What type of incubator did you use to grow your cells?
THZ-D desktop constant temperature oscillator
If known, what was your incubator's throw (shaking diameter)?
Oscillation frequency: 20~350rpm
Amplitude: 26mm
Maximum capacity(each layer): 1000mlx6 or 500mlx9 or 250mlx12
Standard configuration: Spring rack
Dimension of the tray (mm): 400x340
Time range: 0~999minutes
Control temperature: (Environment temperature)Room temp+5℃~60℃
Temperature increment: 0.1℃
Inner temperature error: ±0.5℃
Display: LED
Input power: 350w
Size (mm): 650x500x480
What piece of equipment did you use to measure the devices?
FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader
When was this equipment last calibrated?
August 1st, 2015
Who calibrated the equipment?
Tengteng Gong
What was the wavelength of light you used to excite the cells?
485nm
What was the filter/channel you used to capture the light emission from the cells?
Monochromators, tunable in 1.0 nm increments Wavelength range 400–750 nm
What was the sampling frequency?
50 times per second
Section Ⅳ: Protocol
Did you fill in the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?
Yes
(The InterLab Protocol is provided here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/InterLab_Protocol)
Did you follow the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?
Yes
How did you determine the final dataset that you are reporting?
Since theoretically the emission wavelength of GFP is up to 518nm and the test data showed 518nm got the peak signal, we chose Em518 data. We also tested LB medium as blank and the data was minus the blank.
Section Ⅴ: Measurement results for Interlab Study
Units Reported:
RFUs
We measured the three specific devices required by Interlab Study, using E.coli DH5α as our chassis.
1.Device 1: BBa_J23101 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
2.Device 2: BBa_J23106 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
3.Device 3: BBa_J23117 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
We diluted each of our samples to an OD600 of 0.5 and we started measuring fluorescence when OD600 was within 5% of 0.5. We measured each sample in biological triplicates.
We obtained the fluorescence data by using 485nm as the excitation wavelength and 518nm as the emission wavelength. Measurement data were collected as relative fluorescence units.
Final fluorescence data were collected on August 27, 2015.
We divided fluorescence by relevant OD600 and used the results to draw the graph above. According to the graph, all the samples seemed to be normal except Device3: J23117+I13504. Sadly Device3 didn’t express GFP while Device1 had the highest fluorescence intensity, revealing that J23101 is a relative high strength promoter compared with J23106 and J23117.
The fluorescence results that we submitted to Interlab Study are below:
All the data below has been minus our blank control, LB medium.
SectionⅠ: Introduction
This year, iGEM invited and encouraged all teams to participate in the Second International InterLab Measurement Study in synthetic biology. We were required to measure the expression level of GFP when using three different promoters. Although It was the first time for our team to take part in Interlab Study, we successfully conducted the experiment and obtained the fluorescence data. Now, we are hoping that we can make contributions to Interlab Study.
Section Ⅱ: Provenance and Release
Individuals responsible for conducting InterLab study:
Create the devices: Zhi Zeng Conduct measurements: Guozhao Wu, Shuyan Tang and Zhi Zeng Process data: Shuyan Tang and Yee Zhan
Date of InterLab Study:
The measurement was obtained on August 27, 2015.
Did your team participate in the Extra Credit?
No. (Details can be found here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/Interlab_study)
Do all persons involved consent to the inclusion of this data in publications derived from the iGEM interlab study?
Yes.
Section Ⅲ: Equipment Information
What type of incubator did you use to grow your cells?
THZ-D desktop constant temperature oscillator
If known, what was your incubator's throw (shaking diameter)?
Oscillation frequency: 20~350rpm
Amplitude: 26mm
Maximum capacity(each layer): 1000mlx6 or 500mlx9 or 250mlx12
Standard configuration: Spring rack
Dimension of the tray (mm): 400x340
Time range: 0~999minutes
Control temperature: (Environment temperature)Room temp+5℃~60℃
Temperature increment: 0.1℃
Inner temperature error: ±0.5℃
Display: LED
Input power: 350w
Size (mm): 650x500x480
What piece of equipment did you use to measure the devices?
FlexStation 3 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader
When was this equipment last calibrated?
August 1st, 2015
Who calibrated the equipment?
Tengteng Gong
What was the wavelength of light you used to excite the cells?
485nm
What was the filter/channel you used to capture the light emission from the cells?
Monochromators, tunable in 1.0 nm increments Wavelength range 400–750 nm
What was the sampling frequency?
50 times per second
Section Ⅳ: Protocol
Did you fill in the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?
Yes (The InterLab Protocol is provided here: https://2015.igem.org/Tracks/Measurement/InterLab_Protocol)
Did you follow the InterLab Protocol provided by the Measurement committee?
Yes
How did you determine the final dataset that you are reporting?
Since theoretically the emission wavelength of GFP is up to 518nm and the test data showed 518nm got the peak signal, we chose Em518 data. We also tested LB medium as blank and the data was minus the blank.
Section Ⅴ: Measurement results for Interlab Study
Units Reported:
RFUs
We measured the three specific devices required by Interlab Study, using E.coli DH5α as our chassis.
1.Device 1: BBa_J23101 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
2.Device 2: BBa_J23106 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
3.Device 3: BBa_J23117 + BBa_I13504 (B0034-E0040-B0015) in the pSB1C3 backbone
We diluted each of our samples to an OD600 of 0.5 and we started measuring fluorescence when OD600 was within 5% of 0.5. We measured each sample in biological triplicates.
We obtained the fluorescence data by using 485nm as the excitation wavelength and 518nm as the emission wavelength. Measurement data were collected as relative fluorescence units.
Final fluorescence data were collected on August 27, 2015.
We divided fluorescence by relevant OD600 and used the results to draw the graph above. According to the graph, all the samples seemed to be normal except Device3: J23117+I13504. Sadly Device3 didn’t express GFP while Device1 had the highest fluorescence intensity, revealing that J23101 is a relative high strength promoter compared with J23106 and J23117.
The fluorescence results that we submitted to Interlab Study are below:
All the data below has been minus our blank control, LB medium.