Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong-CUHK/Modeling"
Kpsleung1990 (Talk | contribs) |
Kpsleung1990 (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <p | + | <p>Magnetosome can be used in different perspectives, thus a great potential to apply in multiple instances. Three applications has been modeled as follows:</p> |
− | < | + | <h2>(1) Protein Extraction</h2> |
− | <p | + | <p>Magnetosome can be used in microscopic point of view. We tried to model the efficiency to bind with <b>(a) different proteins</b> and <b>(b) use GFP-nanobody for immunoprecipitation</b>. The main purpose of this modelling is to stimulate the <b>binding dynamics</b> of a fixed concentration of magnetosome and GFP-nanobody in different initial concentration of antigens.</p><br> |
− | <p | + | <p>Various conditions and parameters:</p> |
<center><table><tr> | <center><table><tr> | ||
− | <th>Fixed Quantity</th> <th>Quantity</th> | + | <b><th>Fixed Quantity</th> <th>Quantity</th></b> |
</tr><tr> | </tr><tr> | ||
<th>Volume of the mixture</th> <th>1000 μl</th> | <th>Volume of the mixture</th> <th>1000 μl</th> | ||
</tr></table></center> | </tr></table></center> | ||
− | |||
<center><table><tr> | <center><table><tr> | ||
<th>Parameters</th> <th>Quantity</th> | <th>Parameters</th> <th>Quantity</th> | ||
Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
<th>1.24 × 10<sup>-4</sup> s<sup>-1</sup></th> | <th>1.24 × 10<sup>-4</sup> s<sup>-1</sup></th> | ||
</tr></table></center> | </tr></table></center> | ||
− | |||
<center><table><tr> | <center><table><tr> | ||
<th>Condition</th> <th>Quantity</th> | <th>Condition</th> <th>Quantity</th> | ||
Line 50: | Line 48: | ||
</tr></table></center> | </tr></table></center> | ||
− | <p | + | <p>First, the molarity of magnetosomes is calculated since the amount of magnetosome and its molecular weight are known,</p><br> |
<Center>Molarity of Magnetosome = (1.5 mg / 6.89 × 10<sup>-8</sup> g) / (1 ml) = 2.18 nM</center><br> | <Center>Molarity of Magnetosome = (1.5 mg / 6.89 × 10<sup>-8</sup> g) / (1 ml) = 2.18 nM</center><br> | ||
− | <p | + | <p>There are 362 GFP-nanobody per each magnetosome, so the molarity of GFP-nanobody is:</p><br> |
<Center>Molarity of GFP-nanobody = 2.18 nM × 362 = 7.78 × 10<sup>-7</sup> M</Center><br> | <Center>Molarity of GFP-nanobody = 2.18 nM × 362 = 7.78 × 10<sup>-7</sup> M</Center><br> | ||
− | <p | + | <p>After that, a software called Simbiology in MATLAB is used to model and stimulate the dynamics of the association and dissociation between the molecules. By constructing a model about the mathematical relationship between molecules, reaction process can be stimulated.</p> |
Line 65: | Line 63: | ||
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/6f/CUHK_Modeling_Binding_activity.jpg"></center> | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/6f/CUHK_Modeling_Binding_activity.jpg"></center> | ||
− | <p><b | + | <p><b>Figure 1: Binding activity</p></b> |
− | <p | + | <p>For Forward Reaction (Association) rate: </p> |
<center>k<sub>on</sub> × [GFP-nanobody] × [Antigen]</center> | <center>k<sub>on</sub> × [GFP-nanobody] × [Antigen]</center> | ||
− | <p | + | <p>For Reverse Reaction (Dissociation) rate: </p> |
<center>k<sub>off</sub> × [GFP-nanobody-antigen Complex]</center> | <center>k<sub>off</sub> × [GFP-nanobody-antigen Complex]</center> | ||
− | <p | + | <p>Net Reaction Rate: </p> |
<center>k<sub>on</sub> × [GFP-nanobody] × [Antigen] − k<sub>off</sub> × [GFP-nanobody-antigen Complex]</center> | <center>k<sub>on</sub> × [GFP-nanobody] × [Antigen] − k<sub>off</sub> × [GFP-nanobody-antigen Complex]</center> | ||
− | <p | + | <p>Note: k<sub>on</sub>, k<sub>off</sub> are the reaction rate constants described in the parameters table above.</p> |
− | <p | + | <p>By using SimBiology, we stimulated the dynamic of the system with the initial |
concentration of antigen from 0 to 1.6 μM with an interval of 0.2 μM. </p> | concentration of antigen from 0 to 1.6 μM with an interval of 0.2 μM. </p> | ||
Line 87: | Line 85: | ||
<p><b>Figure 2</b></p> | <p><b>Figure 2</b></p> | ||
− | + | <p>From Figure 2, we can see that when the molarity of antigen below that of GFP-nanobody (7.78 × 10<sup>-7</sup> M), it becomes the limiting reagent, and the final molarity of the nanobody-antigen complex equals the initial molarity of antigen, vice versa.</p><br> | |
− | <p>Another observation is that, as the molarity of antigen increase, the reaction (i.e. the formation of nanobody-antigen complex) goes equilibrium more quickly. This can be explained by the increased forward reaction rate, which depends on the molarity of GFP-nanobody and antigen as well. </p | + | <p>Another observation is that, as the molarity of antigen increase, the reaction (i.e. the formation of nanobody-antigen complex) goes equilibrium more quickly. This can be explained by the increased forward reaction rate, which depends on the molarity of GFP-nanobody and antigen as well. </p> |
Line 102: | Line 100: | ||
− | <h2> 2) Microbial Fuel | + | <h2>(2) Microbial Fuel Cell</h2> |
− | <p>In a | + | <p>In a microbial fuel cell (MFC), chemical energy is transformed into electrical energy through a cascade of electrochemical reaction. The mutated nitrogenase in <i>Azotobacter</i> will produce hydrogen gas by the side reaction and break down into hydrogen ion due to the existence of hydrogenase. Alternatively, the electrons can be transferred to the electrode via the oxidized mediator molecules. By using magnetosome, the distance between the bacteria and electrode can be decreased, thus reduces the diffusion distance of the oxidized mediator. This approach would increase the current density and efficiency of electricity generation in MFC. </p> |
− | <p>In this model, current density distribution in hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell | + | <p>In this model, current density distribution in hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell was studied. It included the fuel coupling between the mass balances at the anode and cathode, the momentum balances in the gas channel, the gas flow in the porous electrodes, the balance of the ionic current carried by the mediator, and an electronic current balance.</p> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/93/CUHK_Modeling_Figure_3.jpg"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/93/CUHK_Modeling_Figure_3.jpg"> | ||
− | <p>Figure 3</p> | + | <b><p>Figure 3</p></b> |
− | <p>The fuel cell in the cathode and anode is | + | <p>The fuel cell in the cathode and anode is counter-flow and it shows that the hydrogen-rich anode gas is entering from the left. The electrochemical reaction in the cell are give below:</p> |
− | <p>Anode: | + | <p>Anode: H<sub>2</sub> + 2 e<sup>−</sup> → 2 H<sup>+</sup></p> |
− | <p>Cathode: | + | <p>Cathode: 1/2 O<sub>2</sub> + 2 e<sup>−</sup> → O2- </p> |
− | <p>This model includes different | + | <p>This model includes different processes:</p> |
<p>• Electronic charge balance (Ohm’s law)</p> | <p>• Electronic charge balance (Ohm’s law)</p> | ||
<p>• Ionic charge balance (Ohm’s law)</p> | <p>• Ionic charge balance (Ohm’s law)</p> | ||
Line 123: | Line 121: | ||
<p>• Mass balances in gas phase in both gas channels and porous electrodes (Maxwell-Stefan Diffusion and Convection)</p> | <p>• Mass balances in gas phase in both gas channels and porous electrodes (Maxwell-Stefan Diffusion and Convection)</p> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>Assuming the Butler-Volmer charge transfer kinetics describes the charge transfer current density and the first electron transfer is used to be rate determining step at the anode, hydrogen is oxidized to form hydrogen ion.</p> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/11/CUHK_Modeling_Formula_i%28a%2Cct%29.jpg"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/11/CUHK_Modeling_Formula_i%28a%2Cct%29.jpg"> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>i<sub>0</sub>,a = the anode exchange current density (A m<sup>-2</sup>)</p> |
− | <p> | + | <p>c<sub>h2</sub> is the molar concentration of hydrogen</p> |
− | <p> | + | <p>c<sub>h+</sub> is the molar concentration of water</p> |
− | <p> | + | <p>c<sub>t</sub> the total concentration of species (mol m<sup>-3</sup>)</p> |
− | <p> | + | <p>c<sub>h2,ref</sub> and c<sub>h+,ref</sub> is the reference concentrations (mol m<sup>-3</sup>)</p> |
<p>F is Faraday’s constant (C/mol)</p> | <p>F is Faraday’s constant (C/mol)</p> | ||
− | <p>R the gas constant (J/ (mol•K))</p> | + | <p>R is the gas constant (J/(mol•K))</p> |
− | <p>T the temperature (K)</p> | + | <p>T is the temperature (K)</p> |
− | <p> | + | <p>η is the overvoltage (V)</p> |
<p>For the cathode:</p> | <p>For the cathode:</p> | ||
Line 144: | Line 142: | ||
− | <p>At the anode’s inlet boundary, the potential is fixed at a reference potential of zero. At the cathode’s inlet boundary, set the potential to the cell voltage, | + | <p>At the anode’s inlet boundary, the potential is fixed at a reference potential of zero. At the cathode’s inlet boundary, set the potential to the cell voltage, V<sub>cell</sub>. The latter is given by</p> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/24/CUHK_Modeling_Formula_v%28cell%29.jpg"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/24/CUHK_Modeling_Formula_v%28cell%29.jpg"> | ||
− | <p>where | + | <p>where V<sub>pol</sub> is the polarization.</p><p>In this model, δ φ<sub>eq,c</sub> = 1 V and δ φ<sub>eq,a</sub> = 0 V ,and the fuel cell over the range 0.2 ≤ V<sub>cell</sub> ≤ 0.95 V is simulated by using V<sub>pol</sub> in the range 0.05 V through 0.8 V as the parameter for the parametric solver.</p> |
− | <p>Results: The following figure shows the hydrogen mole fraction in the anode at a cell polarization of 0.5 | + | <p>Results: The following figure shows the hydrogen mole fraction in the anode at a cell polarization of 0.5 V</p> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f0/CUHK_Modeling_anode.jpg"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/f/f0/CUHK_Modeling_anode.jpg"> | ||
Line 173: | Line 171: | ||
<p>For the following figure, it shows power output as a function of cell voltage. The maximum | <p>For the following figure, it shows power output as a function of cell voltage. The maximum | ||
− | power-output for this unit cell is about 940 W/ | + | power-output for this unit cell is about 940 W m<sup>-2</sup></p> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d7/CUHK_Modeling_Graph.jpg"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d7/CUHK_Modeling_Graph.jpg"> | ||
− | + | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 18 September 2015