Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Description"

m
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<div class="jumbotron" style="background-image: url()">
 
<div class="jumbotron" style="background-image: url()">
 
<div class="jumbotron-text">
 
<div class="jumbotron-text">
−
<h1 style="margin-bottom: 0px">Project description</h1>
+
<h1 style="margin-bottom: 0px">Description</h1>
−
<p>A brief summary of our project.</p>
+
<p>How we built upon previous iGEM projects.</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 21: Line 21:
 
      
 
      
 
      
 
      
−
<p>Biosensors can be used to detect toxic substances in a highly specific and sensitive manner. Furthermore, they can be cheaper and easier to handle than conventional detection methods (<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Description#Kaur2015">Kaur et al. 2015</a>). For this reason, they are a field of active research and a popular topic in the iGEM competition. Most of these biosensors make use of living microorganisms, which raises a number of problems. Among them are legal issues and safety concerns, as it must be prevented that genetically modified organisms are released into the environment. Moreover, these sensors are often not very user-friendly, as they have a limited shelf life and their application outside the laboratory is complicated. In order to solve these problems and thus make biosensors applicable in everyday life, we developed cell-free biosensors that can be used as paper-based test strips.</p>
+
<p>The aim of our project was to make biosensors applicable in everyday life. Therefore, we developed two cell-free systems and tested several biosensors <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i>.</p>
−
   
+
<p>A central aspect was the establishment of a cell-free protein synthesis system. An ideal reporter protein is superfolder GFP (sfGFP). Consequently, we used sfGFP as a reporter gene and as a positive control for all our experiments. We started with the BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I746909">BBa_I746909</a> by team Cambridge 2008 and observed that it was expressed in our CFPS. However, the expression strength was not sufficient for our biosensors. Therefore, we inserted a translation enhancing untranslated region (UTR) between the T7 promoter and the coding sequence, creating <a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1758102">Part:BBa_K1758102</a>. We observed a drastic increase in fluorescence when testing this modified construct and performed our further experiments with this optimized sfGFP. We also tested whether the optimized UTR has an effect <i>in vivo</i> as well. We observed that the fluorescence of <i>E. coli</i> expressing the optimized sfGFP was significantly higher than the fluorescence of cultures expressing <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I746909">BBa_I746909</a>. The difference could even be seen with the naked eye.</p>
−
    <p>Our principal approach towards this end relies on <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/CFPS">cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS)</a>. This system is suitable for classical repressor- or activator-based biosensors, but by carrying out the expression of the reporter protein in a cell extract, biosafety problems are prevented. Furthermore, the cell extract remains functional when it is applied onto paper, and after lyophilization, such a test strip can be stored for a long time (<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Description#Pardee2014">Pardee et al. 2014</a>).</p>
+
 
−
   
+
<p>The next step was to test biosensors for their functionality in our cell-free systems. Therefore, we used the following biosensors by previous iGEM teams:</p>
−
    <p>We applied this system to the detection of <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/HeavyMetals">heavy metals</a>. Heavy metal contaminations are a global problem and a simple and cheap test would be a great help to many people. Several iGEM teams have dealt with the detection of heavy metals, so we decided to build upon this work and combine several heavy metal biosensors into one cell-free test strip. Consequently, we tested the following biosensors by previous iGEM teams, improved their characterization and optimized them for CFPS:</p>
+
<ul>
−
    <ul>
+
 
         <li>arsenic (<a href="https://2006.igem.org/wiki/index.php/University_of_Edinburgh_2006" target="_blank">Edinburgh 2006</a>, <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Buenos_Aires" target="_blank">Buenos Aires 2013</a>)</li>
 
         <li>arsenic (<a href="https://2006.igem.org/wiki/index.php/University_of_Edinburgh_2006" target="_blank">Edinburgh 2006</a>, <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Buenos_Aires" target="_blank">Buenos Aires 2013</a>)</li>
−
         <li>mercury (<a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Peking" target="_blank">Peking 2010</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K346002" target="_blank">BBa_K346002</a> )<p>The mercury sensor is already good characterized <i> in vivo</i>. We improved it by doing an <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/HeavyMetals" target="_blank"><i> in vitro</i> characterization</a>  for it, which enables a use in cell free biosensor systems. Our data suggest, that the <i> in vitro </i> version, our sensor, indicates to the possibility to detect even lower concentrations.</p> </li>
+
         <li>mercury (<a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Peking" target="_blank">Peking 2010</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K346002" target="_blank">BBa_K346002</a>)</li>
−
         <li>nickel (<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:LMU-Munich" target="_blank">LMU Munich 2011</a>,<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K549001" target="_blank">BBa_K549001</a> )</li>       
+
         <li>nickel (<a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:LMU-Munich" target="_blank">LMU Munich 2011</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K549001" target="_blank">BBa_K549001</a>)</li>       
−
         <li>lead (<a href="https://2007.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Lead" target="_blank">Brown 2007</a>,<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I721003" target="_blank">BBa_I721003</a> )</li>
+
         <li>lead (<a href="https://2007.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Lead" target="_blank">Brown 2007</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I721003" target="_blank">BBa_I721003</a>)</li>
−
         <li>chromium (<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:BIT/Project" target="_blank">BIT 2013</a>,<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1058007" target="_blank">BBa_K1058007</a> )</li>
+
         <li>chromium (<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:BIT/Project" target="_blank">BIT 2013</a>, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1058007" target="_blank">BBa_K1058007</a>)</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
−
         <p> Nickel (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758353" target="_blank">BBa_K1758353</a>) lead (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758333" target="_blank">BBa_K1758333</a>) and chromium (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758313" target="_blank">BBa_K1758313</a>) sensors were improved by <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/HeavyMetals" target="_blank">characterization</a> <i>in vivo</i> as well as <i> in vitro</i>.
+
          
−
     
+
    <p>We improved the characterization of these biosensors by performing tests <i>in vivo</i> as well as in our CFPS. In particular, we improved the chromium sensor by <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758313" target="_blank">codon-optimization</a>.</p>
−
    </ul>
+
−
<p>In addition, we constructed a new heavy metal biosensor for copper <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1758324" target="_blank">BBa_K1758324</a>.</p>
+
−
   
+
−
    <p>In order to optimize our CFPS biosensors, we created a <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Modeling">model</a> that describes a repressor-based biosensor in our cell-free protein synthesis system. This model can help in adjusting the detection limit of our biosensors by predicting the necessary amount of repressor. As a result, test strips can be built that tell the user whether the concentration of a substance exceeds the safety limit.</p>
+
−
   
+
−
    <p>In addition to heavy metals, we also wanted to tackle a problem that is currently very relevant in our area: The use of <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/DateRapeDrugs">date rape drugs</a>. These drugs are usually a mixture of different substances that produce narcotic effects and thus make the victim defenseless. By now, the detection of date rape drugs is only possible in retrospect in the laboratory and only in a limited time frame. There is no possibility to check suspicious drinks quickly and easily.</p>
+
−
   
+
−
    <p>A biosensor based on cell-free protein synthesis produces a signal within one hour. However, for the detection of date rape drugs, the sensor needs to be even faster. In order to take this requirement into account, we devised a second biosensor design. This approach, called <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/PRIA">Plasmid Repressor Interaction Assay (PRIA)</a>, utilizes the interaction between a purified repressor protein and its operator sequence. On of these two components is immobilized on paper and the other carries a fluorescent label. In the presence of an analyte, the partners separate, which results in a loss of fluorescence at the specific spot.</p>
+
−
   
+
−
    <p>Both CFPS and PRIA make use of fluorescence as an output signal because this requires no cofactors or subtrates and offers a good sensitivity (<a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Description#Daunert2000">Daunert et al. 2000</a>). However, fluorescence can usually not be seen with the naked eye. Nevertheless, it is possible to easily <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Project/Detection">visualize fluorescence</a> using a smartphone and filters. In 2014, iGEM Aachen have demonstrated this possibility using a filter for excitation. We improved this idea with a second filter in front of the camera, which enables everyone to specifally detect fluorescence by taking an image with their smartphone.</p>
+
−
   
+
−
    <p>On top of that, we developed an <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Design"target="blank">app</a> which automatically interprets the image and provides the user with information about the substances that were detected.</p>
+
−
   
+
−
    <p>When developing a biosensor for date rape drugs, we wondered whether all the information we had gathered should be published, as some might contain the potential of misuse. In addition, we and other teams provide knowledge on our wikis in an open source context, that might contain misuse potential. This inspired us to deal with the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Practices/DualUse">Dual use</a> issue in general. In our report we address legal and ethical questions. We analyze the position of iGEM as potential role model in the process of establishing awareness of the issue in the scientific community. While iGEM does not yet provide guidelines and security risk assessment, we propose to integrate the issue in the biosafety page and forms to complete the already existing safety measures. The 28 pages report is provided as <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/be/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_Dual-Use_Report.pdf"target="blank">PDF </a>and summarized on our wiki.</p>
+
  
 +
    <p>Both of our biosensor designs make use of fluorescence as an output signal because this requires no cofactors or subtrates and offers a good sensitivity. However, fluorescence can usually not be seen with the naked eye. Nevertheless, it is possible to easily visualize fluorescence using a smartphone and filters. In 2014, <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Aachen" taget="_blank">iGEM Aachen</a> have demonstrated this possibility using a filter for excitation. We improved this idea with a second filter in front of the camera, which enables everyone to specifally detect fluorescence by taking an image with their smartphone.</p>
  
−
<div class="references">
+
<p>In summary, our project builds  upon the projects of several previous iGEM teams. We managed to improve the function and characterization of several of their BioBricks.</p>
−
<h2>References</h2>
+
−
<p id="Daunert2000">Daunert, Sylvia; Barrett, Gary; Feliciano, Jessika S.; Shetty, Ranjit S.; Shrestha, Suresh; Smith-Spencer, Wendy (2000): Genetically Engineered Whole-Cell Sensing Systems: Coupling Biological Recognition with Reporter Genes. In Chem. Rev. 100 (7), pp. 2705–2738. DOI: 10.1021/cr990115p.</p>
+
−
<p id="Kaur2015">Kaur, Hardeep; Kumar, Rabindra; Babu, J. Nagendra; Mittal, Sunil (2015): Advances in arsenic biosensor development--a comprehensive review. In Biosensors & bioelectronics 63, pp. 533–545. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.08.003.</p>
+
−
<p id="Pardee2014">Pardee, Keith; Green, Alexander A.; Ferrante, Tom; Cameron, D. Ewen; DaleyKeyser, Ajay; Yin, Peng; Collins, James J. (2014): Paper-based synthetic gene networks. In Cell 159 (4), pp. 940–954. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.004.</p>
+
−
</div>
+
−
 
+
  
 
<div class="row footer">
 
<div class="row footer">

Revision as of 23:18, 18 September 2015

iGEM Bielefeld 2015


Description

How we built upon previous iGEM projects.

The aim of our project was to make biosensors applicable in everyday life. Therefore, we developed two cell-free systems and tested several biosensors in vivo and in vitro.

A central aspect was the establishment of a cell-free protein synthesis system. An ideal reporter protein is superfolder GFP (sfGFP). Consequently, we used sfGFP as a reporter gene and as a positive control for all our experiments. We started with the BioBrick BBa_I746909 by team Cambridge 2008 and observed that it was expressed in our CFPS. However, the expression strength was not sufficient for our biosensors. Therefore, we inserted a translation enhancing untranslated region (UTR) between the T7 promoter and the coding sequence, creating Part:BBa_K1758102. We observed a drastic increase in fluorescence when testing this modified construct and performed our further experiments with this optimized sfGFP. We also tested whether the optimized UTR has an effect in vivo as well. We observed that the fluorescence of E. coli expressing the optimized sfGFP was significantly higher than the fluorescence of cultures expressing BBa_I746909. The difference could even be seen with the naked eye.

The next step was to test biosensors for their functionality in our cell-free systems. Therefore, we used the following biosensors by previous iGEM teams:

We improved the characterization of these biosensors by performing tests in vivo as well as in our CFPS. In particular, we improved the chromium sensor by codon-optimization.

Both of our biosensor designs make use of fluorescence as an output signal because this requires no cofactors or subtrates and offers a good sensitivity. However, fluorescence can usually not be seen with the naked eye. Nevertheless, it is possible to easily visualize fluorescence using a smartphone and filters. In 2014, iGEM Aachen have demonstrated this possibility using a filter for excitation. We improved this idea with a second filter in front of the camera, which enables everyone to specifally detect fluorescence by taking an image with their smartphone.

In summary, our project builds upon the projects of several previous iGEM teams. We managed to improve the function and characterization of several of their BioBricks.

Let´s take a closer look at CFPS!