Difference between revisions of "Team:ETH Zurich/Safety"
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
− | <h2>Method of | + | <h2>Method of safety evaluation</h2> |
<p>To manage the risks associated with the development of our MicroBeacon CTC detection system we used the following scheme to evaluate possible adverse scenarios and the effectiveness of countermeasures:</p> | <p>To manage the risks associated with the development of our MicroBeacon CTC detection system we used the following scheme to evaluate possible adverse scenarios and the effectiveness of countermeasures:</p> |
Revision as of 00:14, 19 September 2015
- Project
- Modeling
- Lab
- Human
Practices - Parts
- About Us
General Safety Considerations
Method of safety evaluation
To manage the risks associated with the development of our MicroBeacon CTC detection system we used the following scheme to evaluate possible adverse scenarios and the effectiveness of countermeasures:
Preventive measures can either serve to decrease the likelihood (x-axis) or the severity (y-axis) of a potential scenario or both.
Working at the ETH Zurich labs
Responsible conduct during everyday lab hours is parmount for the prevention of accidents. Every new person in the ETH D-BSSE lab must undergo safety training instructed by a Technical Manager. No exception was made for our iGEM team. Though much of it is common sense and our work was restricted to Biosafety Level 1, there is still a lot that can go wrong. Here are a few examples:
Possible Scenario | Old Risk | Countermeasures | New Risk |
Accidental poisoning |
|
||
My E. coli are on fire! |
Since we use Bunsen burners to create a semi-sterile working environment it is quite likely that something catches fire. |
||
I spilled and entire bottle of ethidium bromide on my lab coat! |
|
||
I forgot to put my goggles on and now I have sulphuric acid in my eye! |
|
||
Dangerous equipment |
|
Handling genetically modified organisms
Since our MicroBeacon E. coli cells are genetically modified they might harbor a potential and unforseen risk to the environment. However, our MicroBeacons do not express any toxic substances and the fact that they prefer temperatures around 37 °C makes it unlikely that they survive for a long time when accidentally released. We originally planned to have the MicroBeacons express TRAIL as a means to induce apoptosis in targeted cells. However, wie decided against this in order to minimize any potential health hazard.
Possible Scenario | Old Risk | Countermeasures | New Risk |
E.coli infection |
|
||
E.coli released into environment |
|
Using our MicroBeacon CTC detection system for medical diagnosis
It is never too early to think ahead what might happen if our MicroBeacon project is further developed and commercially used as a cancer diagnosis kit. Since one component of the kit are live bacteria, one must be especially careful in a clinical environment. Cancer patients may have a compromised immune system already.
Possible Scenario | Old Risk | Countermeasures | New Risk |
E.coli infection |
|
||
False positive test result |
Consider the ethical implications of diagnosing cancer metastasis in a healthy individual. |
||
Production error |
On the side of the manufacturer: consider the finanial risk and possible damage to the company's reputation |