Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong-CUHK/Description"

 
(45 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Hong_Kong-CUHK}}
 
{{Hong_Kong-CUHK}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
<div style="text-align:justify; text-justify:inter-ideograph">
+
<center><div style="text-align:justify; text-justify:inter-ideograph; width:800px">
 +
<h1>Part Improvement</h1>
 +
<br>
 +
<h2>Background</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">Magnetosomes, an organelle encapsulating magnetic iron crystal, can be applied in many aspects. One of these applications is to construct a more efficient microbial fuel cell (MFC). MFC is a device which uses electrons produced by microorganism to generate electricity. If we genetically modify the bacteria <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> to have magnetosomes, magnetosomes inside them would be attracted towards the electrodes by magnetic force and in the process, bringing the whole bacteria along with it. As a result, the physical distance between the bacteria and electrodes will be decreased, thus an increase in the efficiency of the MFC as the diffusion rate for the electron to the electrode can be greatly increased.</p>
  
<h1>The Magnetosome </h1>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">Additionally, in the review of the previous iGEM teams, the idea of constructing an MFC has been popular. For example, the iGEM 2013 Bielefeld-Germany team also constructed an MFC. After a brief study of their project, we understood that one of their components is the oprF gene (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a>). The team has claimed that oprF, an outer membrane porin, could increase the efficiency of MFC by allowing electron shuttle-mediated extracellular electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes. </p>
 +
<br>
 +
<h2>Investigation on K1172501</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">However, after studying carefully, we found that the translated sequence of <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> contains premature stop codons. After translation, the sequence of <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> provided by the Bielefeld-Germany team will not be able to translate into an oprF porin protein. As the DNA sequence of <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> is greatly different from oprF DNA sequence from <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>, the bacteria Germany team claimed to obtain oprF gene sequence from.</p></font>
 +
<br>
 +
<h2>OprF in <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i></h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">We found that OprF exists on the outer membrane of <i>A. vinelandii</i>, the bacteria we have been working on. Therefore we chose it to provide an alternative OprF. The sequence provided by <i>A. vinelandii</i> can be completely translated to form OprF with no stop codon appearing in the gene except in the last residue. Here we provide the biobrick, <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648045">K1648045</a> and we are planning to provide <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648047">K1648047</a> for insertion with different promoters.</p>
  
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/25/CUHK_Project_The_Magnetosome.jpg" height ="200px" align="right">
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/31/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto3.jpg"></center>
<p> Magnetosome is a membrane bounded intracellular structure, something that is actually rare in prokaryotic organisms like bacteria. They are of nano-size ranging from about 35-120 nm. Magnetosomes comprise of a magnetic mineral crystal surrounded by a lipid bilayer membrane about 3–4 nm thick (fig. _1_). A number of common cytoplasmic membrane fatty acids components can be found in the magnetosome membrane. It is then later highly suspected that magnetosomes are membrane invaginations originating from the cytoplasmic membrane [1].
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 1:</b> The photo of 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1: PCR product of oprF encoding from <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> strain DJ genome.</p>
The magnetosome membrane is highly significant as it creates an isolated environment within the cell which is crucial for mineral crystal nucleation and growth [2]. These membrane-enclosed inorganic crystals consist of either the magnetic minerals magnetite (Fe3O4) or greigite (Fe3S4). The particles usually arrange themselves along the cell axis either in one or multiple chains . Different varieties of crystal morphologies such as cubo-octahedral, elongated hexagonal prismatic, and bullet-shaped morphologies have been discovered [1] </p>.  
+
  
<p align="right"> Figure 1: Magnetosome </p>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto4.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 2:</b> Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for pSB1C3-oprF (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648045">K1648045</a>) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.</p>
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
<h2>Mutated oprF with Higher Efficiency</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">Furthermore, to construct a more efficient MFC, a mutated OprF with 5-point mutations is utilized. According to a paper concerning the factors affecting the conformation of OprF, we found that mutations on all 4 Cys to Ser residues, and Lys to Gly residues at 189<sup>th</sup> position (K189G; C201S; C210S; C216S; C230S) of <i>A. vinelandii</i> oprF would have higher probability in open-channel conformation 5 times more than WT oprF [2]. With the introduction of this mutated OprF into the bacteria, it is expected that the electron carrier diffusion into or out of the bacteria, as well as the efficiency of MFC, would be increased by 5 fold. Knowing that <i>E. coli</i> is capable to form porin using plasmid DNA [1], we used it to carry out the investigation on the oprF efficiency compare to <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a>, oprF from <i>A. vinelandii</i> and mutated OprF (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648046">K1648046</a>).</p>
 +
<br>
  
<h1>The Magnetotactic Bacteria -- The origin of magnetosome </h1>
+
<h2>Characterization of Different oprF</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">For comparison, identical promoter, J13002 (a constitutive promoter), was added before the gene in pSB1C3 for constitutive expression of different oprF in bacteria. There are <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648048">K1648048</a> for oprF from <i>A. vinelandii</i>, <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648049">K1648049</a> for mutated oprF from <i>A. vinelandii</i> and <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648050">K1648050</a> for <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> from Germany iGEM team.</p>
  
<p>Magnetosomes are intracellular membrane bounded organelle synthesized by Magnetotactic bacteria. First discovered in 1975 by Richard Blakemore, these magnetotactic bacteria are mobile, aquatic, gram-negative prokaryotes [3] with a myriad of cellular morphologies, including coccoid, rod-shaped, vibrioid, helical or even multi-cellular. They are found in their highest numbers at, or just below, the oxic-anoxic interface in aquatic habitats and exhibit a negative growth response to atmospheric concentrations of oxygen. </p>
 
  
<p>Magnetosomes form a chain and align themselves along the axis within the bacteria. With the formation of magnetosomes inside them, they are able to align passively to the earth’s magnetic field and hence use  minimum energy to swim along geomagnetic field lines. This behaviour is called magnetotaxis [4] and is beneficial to the survival of the bacteria as it helps them to reach regions of optimal oxygen concentrations without random, unnecessary movements [5]. </p>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c6/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto2.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 3:</b> Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for J13002-oprF (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648048">K1648048</a>) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.</p>
  
 +
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/11/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto1.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 4:</b> Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-2: Recombination Template for R0040-oprF* (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648049">K1648049</a>) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site.
 +
<br><br>
  
<h1> Why and What is Azotobacter? </h1>
+
<h2>Experiment Set-up and Ongoing Test</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">In the experiment, we will use the colour change of methylene blue as an indicator to compare the efficiency between the transformed bacteria with different oprF plasmids and wild type bacteria. The desired function of the oprF porin protein for this experiment is to allow the diffusion of (reduced) electron carriers in and out of the periplasmic membrane from the outside of the cell. As the electron carrier (e.g. NAD<sup>+</sup>) picks up an electron in the periplasmic space (i.e. being reduced to NADH) and diffuse out of the cell through the porin protein, the electron on the NADH will transfer to methylene blue (the mediator solution outside the cell). When the methylene blue is reduced to form leucomethylene blue, it turns from blue to colourless. Hence, the rate of transmission of electron carrier is calculated by the rate of reduction of methylene blue. The experiment is planned to carry out soon. The plasmids will also be transformed into <i>A. vinelandii</i> for the construction of our MFC.</p></font>
  
<p>Though magnetotactic bacteria is the origin of magnetosomes, these bacteria are described by scientists as a group of fastidious prokaryotic bacteria -- meaning that they are difficult to cultivate owing to their unusual growth requirements. Their micro-aerophilic nature require elaborate growth techniques, and they are difficult to grow on the surface of agar plates, which would make the screening for mutants a problem [6]. </p>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a6/Cuhk_solutionphoto.jpg" width="400px"></center>
 +
<br>  
  
<p>The lack of effective methods of DNA transfer in these microorganisms is a challenge too. Luckily, the situation is improving due to better technologies recently and some of the genes from M. magnetotacticum have been confirmed functionally expressed in E. coli. This shows that the transcriptional and translational elements of the two microorganisms are compatible. With such good news, a number of previous igem teams including kyoto: 2014, OCU-China: 2013, Washington: 2011 and UNIK_Copenhagen: 2013 have been working with transferring the magnetosome related genes to e.coli. Some exciting results the formation of magnetosome membrane in e.coli (by the kyoto team) has been reported by previous teams, however, never the whole magnetosome.
 
We have been wondering why magnetosomes seems so hard to be formed in e.coli. And then, we come up with a hypothesis -- the formation of magnetosome requires a micro-aerobic or anaerobic environment as the magnetotatic bacteria are all living micro-aerobically. </p>
 
  
<p>Therefore, we chose a new bacteria to work on our magnetosome project -- the Azotobacter vinelandii.
+
<h3>References</h3>
Azotobacter vinelandii is gram-negative diazotroph. It is a soil bacterium related to the Pseudomonas genus that fixes nitrogen under aerobic conditions while having enzymatic mechanisms protecting its oxygen-sensitive nitrogenase from oxygen damage. This findings shows that A. vinelandii is an excellent host for the production and characterization of oxygen-sensitive proteins or organelles as in our case [7]. </p>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">1. Sugawara, Etsuko, Keiji Nagano, and Hiroshi Nikaido. "Factors affecting the folding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprFporin into the one-domain open conformer." MBio 1.4 (2010): e00228-10.</p></font>
 
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">2. Yong, Yang‐Chun, et al. "Enhancement of extracellular electron transfer and bioelectricity output by synthetic porin." Biotechnology and bioengineering110.2 (2013): 408-416.</p></font>
<p>With the biggest advantage of using azotobacter is that it is an aerobic bacteria with an intracellular anaerobic condition, we can grow it easily in normal conditions in lab without expensive equipments like fermenter, while fulfilling the growing criteria for the magnetosome. Besides, most parts in registry are functionable in Azotobacter and Azotobacter is of safety level group 1 too.  One more important thing is that it can do homologous recombination by itself which is a critical process we need in our project. </p>
+
</div></center>
 
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 01:39, 7 October 2015

Part Improvement


Background

Magnetosomes, an organelle encapsulating magnetic iron crystal, can be applied in many aspects. One of these applications is to construct a more efficient microbial fuel cell (MFC). MFC is a device which uses electrons produced by microorganism to generate electricity. If we genetically modify the bacteria Azotobacter vinelandii to have magnetosomes, magnetosomes inside them would be attracted towards the electrodes by magnetic force and in the process, bringing the whole bacteria along with it. As a result, the physical distance between the bacteria and electrodes will be decreased, thus an increase in the efficiency of the MFC as the diffusion rate for the electron to the electrode can be greatly increased.

Additionally, in the review of the previous iGEM teams, the idea of constructing an MFC has been popular. For example, the iGEM 2013 Bielefeld-Germany team also constructed an MFC. After a brief study of their project, we understood that one of their components is the oprF gene (K1172501). The team has claimed that oprF, an outer membrane porin, could increase the efficiency of MFC by allowing electron shuttle-mediated extracellular electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes.


Investigation on K1172501

However, after studying carefully, we found that the translated sequence of K1172501 contains premature stop codons. After translation, the sequence of K1172501 provided by the Bielefeld-Germany team will not be able to translate into an oprF porin protein. As the DNA sequence of K1172501 is greatly different from oprF DNA sequence from Pseudomonas fluorescens, the bacteria Germany team claimed to obtain oprF gene sequence from.


OprF in Azotobacter vinelandii

We found that OprF exists on the outer membrane of A. vinelandii, the bacteria we have been working on. Therefore we chose it to provide an alternative OprF. The sequence provided by A. vinelandii can be completely translated to form OprF with no stop codon appearing in the gene except in the last residue. Here we provide the biobrick, K1648045 and we are planning to provide K1648047 for insertion with different promoters.

Figure 1: The photo of 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1: PCR product of oprF encoding from Azotobacter vinelandii strain DJ genome.

Figure 2: Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for pSB1C3-oprF (K1648045) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.


Mutated oprF with Higher Efficiency

Furthermore, to construct a more efficient MFC, a mutated OprF with 5-point mutations is utilized. According to a paper concerning the factors affecting the conformation of OprF, we found that mutations on all 4 Cys to Ser residues, and Lys to Gly residues at 189th position (K189G; C201S; C210S; C216S; C230S) of A. vinelandii oprF would have higher probability in open-channel conformation 5 times more than WT oprF [2]. With the introduction of this mutated OprF into the bacteria, it is expected that the electron carrier diffusion into or out of the bacteria, as well as the efficiency of MFC, would be increased by 5 fold. Knowing that E. coli is capable to form porin using plasmid DNA [1], we used it to carry out the investigation on the oprF efficiency compare to K1172501, oprF from A. vinelandii and mutated OprF (K1648046).


Characterization of Different oprF

For comparison, identical promoter, J13002 (a constitutive promoter), was added before the gene in pSB1C3 for constitutive expression of different oprF in bacteria. There are K1648048 for oprF from A. vinelandii, K1648049 for mutated oprF from A. vinelandii and K1648050 for K1172501 from Germany iGEM team.

Figure 3: Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for J13002-oprF (K1648048) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.

Figure 4: Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-2: Recombination Template for R0040-oprF* (K1648049) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site.

Experiment Set-up and Ongoing Test

In the experiment, we will use the colour change of methylene blue as an indicator to compare the efficiency between the transformed bacteria with different oprF plasmids and wild type bacteria. The desired function of the oprF porin protein for this experiment is to allow the diffusion of (reduced) electron carriers in and out of the periplasmic membrane from the outside of the cell. As the electron carrier (e.g. NAD+) picks up an electron in the periplasmic space (i.e. being reduced to NADH) and diffuse out of the cell through the porin protein, the electron on the NADH will transfer to methylene blue (the mediator solution outside the cell). When the methylene blue is reduced to form leucomethylene blue, it turns from blue to colourless. Hence, the rate of transmission of electron carrier is calculated by the rate of reduction of methylene blue. The experiment is planned to carry out soon. The plasmids will also be transformed into A. vinelandii for the construction of our MFC.


References

1. Sugawara, Etsuko, Keiji Nagano, and Hiroshi Nikaido. "Factors affecting the folding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprFporin into the one-domain open conformer." MBio 1.4 (2010): e00228-10.

2. Yong, Yang‐Chun, et al. "Enhancement of extracellular electron transfer and bioelectricity output by synthetic porin." Biotechnology and bioengineering110.2 (2013): 408-416.