Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong-CUHK/Description"

 
(30 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Hong_Kong-CUHK}}
 
{{Hong_Kong-CUHK}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
<style>
+
<center><div style="text-align:justify; text-justify:inter-ideograph; width:800px">
.photoRight{
+
<h1>Part Improvement</h1>
    border: 20px;
+
<br>
    float: right;
+
<h2>Background</h2>
}
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">Magnetosomes, an organelle encapsulating magnetic iron crystal, can be applied in many aspects. One of these applications is to construct a more efficient microbial fuel cell (MFC). MFC is a device which uses electrons produced by microorganism to generate electricity. If we genetically modify the bacteria <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> to have magnetosomes, magnetosomes inside them would be attracted towards the electrodes by magnetic force and in the process, bringing the whole bacteria along with it. As a result, the physical distance between the bacteria and electrodes will be decreased, thus an increase in the efficiency of the MFC as the diffusion rate for the electron to the electrode can be greatly increased.</p>
.photoLeft{
+
    border: 10px;
+
    float: left;
+
}
+
#bannerContainer {
+
    background-image: url('https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/b/b4/CUHK_Background_Project.jpg');
+
    background-size: 1500px;
+
    background-repeat: no-repeat;
+
}
+
  
</style>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">Additionally, in the review of the previous iGEM teams, the idea of constructing an MFC has been popular. For example, the iGEM 2013 Bielefeld-Germany team also constructed an MFC. After a brief study of their project, we understood that one of their components is the oprF gene (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a>). The team has claimed that oprF, an outer membrane porin, could increase the efficiency of MFC by allowing electron shuttle-mediated extracellular electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes. </p>
<center><div style="text-align:justify; text-justify:inter-ideograph; width:1000px">
+
<br>
 +
<h2>Investigation on K1172501</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">However, after studying carefully, we found that the translated sequence of <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> contains premature stop codons. After translation, the sequence of <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> provided by the Bielefeld-Germany team will not be able to translate into an oprF porin protein. As the DNA sequence of <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> is greatly different from oprF DNA sequence from <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>, the bacteria Germany team claimed to obtain oprF gene sequence from.</p></font>
 +
<br>
 +
<h2>OprF in <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i></h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">We found that OprF exists on the outer membrane of <i>A. vinelandii</i>, the bacteria we have been working on. Therefore we chose it to provide an alternative OprF. The sequence provided by <i>A. vinelandii</i> can be completely translated to form OprF with no stop codon appearing in the gene except in the last residue. Here we provide the biobrick, <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648045">K1648045</a> and we are planning to provide <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648047">K1648047</a> for insertion with different promoters.</p>
  
 +
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/31/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto3.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 1:</b> The photo of 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1: PCR product of oprF encoding from <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> strain DJ genome.</p>
  
<a href="#azotobacter">Azotobacter</a>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto4.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 2:</b> Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for pSB1C3-oprF (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648045">K1648045</a>) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.</p>
  
<h1>Magnetosome - Nanostructure with Great Application Potentials</h1>
+
<br>
  
<div class="photoRight">
+
<h2>Mutated oprF with Higher Efficiency</h2>
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/2/25/CUHK_Project_The_Magnetosome.jpg" height ="200px" style="margin:-30px 0px 0px 20px" align="right">
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">Furthermore, to construct a more efficient MFC, a mutated OprF with 5-point mutations is utilized. According to a paper concerning the factors affecting the conformation of OprF, we found that mutations on all 4 Cys to Ser residues, and Lys to Gly residues at 189<sup>th</sup> position (K189G; C201S; C210S; C216S; C230S) of <i>A. vinelandii</i> oprF would have higher probability in open-channel conformation 5 times more than WT oprF [2]. With the introduction of this mutated OprF into the bacteria, it is expected that the electron carrier diffusion into or out of the bacteria, as well as the efficiency of MFC, would be increased by 5 fold. Knowing that <i>E. coli</i> is capable to form porin using plasmid DNA [1], we used it to carry out the investigation on the oprF efficiency compare to <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a>, oprF from <i>A. vinelandii</i> and mutated OprF (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648046">K1648046</a>).</p>
<p align="right"> Figure 1: Magnetosome </p>
+
<br>
</div>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">Magnetosome is a kind of rare intracellular membrane-bound structure in a specific type of prokaryotes, of nano-size ranging about 35 - 120 nm. They comprise of a magnetic mineral crystal encapsulated by a lipid bilayer about 3 – 4 nm thick (Figure 1) [1], which might be utilized in various applications involving magnetic field. </p></font>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">
+
The magnetosome membrane is highly significant for its biogenesis as it creates an isolated environment within the cell crucial for mineral crystal nucleation and growth [2]. These inorganic crystals are magnetic in nature (hence its name), which compose of either magnetite (Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>) or greigite (Fe<sub>3</sub>S<sub>4</sub>). The magnetosomes usually arrange in one or multiple chains along the cell axis. Different varieties of crystal morphologies such as cubo-octahedral, elongated hexagonal prismatic, and bullet-shaped morphologies were discovered in different magnetotactic bacteria [1].</p></font>
+
  
 +
<h2>Characterization of Different oprF</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">For comparison, identical promoter, J13002 (a constitutive promoter), was added before the gene in pSB1C3 for constitutive expression of different oprF in bacteria. There are <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648048">K1648048</a> for oprF from <i>A. vinelandii</i>, <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648049">K1648049</a> for mutated oprF from <i>A. vinelandii</i> and <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648050">K1648050</a> for <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> from Germany iGEM team.</p>
  
<h1>Magnetotactic Bacteria - The Magnetosome Producer </h1>
 
<div class="photoLeft">
 
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/12/CUHK_Project_The_Magnetotactic_Bacteria.jpg" height ="200px" style="margin:0px 20px 0px 0px" align="left">
 
<p align="left" padding="10">Figure 2: Micrograph of a Magnetotactic Bacteria, <font color=#ff0000>(Species name!!!)</font></p>
 
</div>
 
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">Magnetosomes are organelles synthesized by magnetotactic bacteria for its movement along magnetic field. First discovered in 1975 by Richard Blakemore, these magnetotactic bacteria are mobile, aquatic, gram-negative prokaryotes [3] with an array of cellular morphologies, including coccoid, rod-shaped, vibrioid, helical or even multi-cellular. Some of them are more extensively studied, including <i>Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum</i> and <i>Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense</i>. They are found optimally grown at the oxic-anoxic interface in aquatic habitats, and in fact grow less happily under atmospheric oxygen concentration.</p></font>
 
  
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">Magnetosomes form a chain and are aligned along the axis within the bacteria. With these magnetosomes inside them, they are able to align passively to the earth’s magnetic field so as to swim along geomagnetic field lines. This behaviour is called magnetotaxis [4] and is beneficial to their survival by aiding them to reach regions of optimal oxygen concentrations at minimal energy cost [5]. </p></font>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c6/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto2.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 3:</b> Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for J13002-oprF (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648048">K1648048</a>) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.</p>
  
<a name="azotobacter"></a>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/11/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto1.jpg"></center>
<h1> <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> - What and Why? </h1>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 4:</b> Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-2: Recombination Template for R0040-oprF* (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648049">K1648049</a>) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site.
 +
<br><br>
  
 +
<h2>Experiment Set-up and Ongoing Test</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">In the experiment, we will use the colour change of methylene blue as an indicator to compare the efficiency between the transformed bacteria with different oprF plasmids and wild type bacteria. The desired function of the oprF porin protein for this experiment is to allow the diffusion of (reduced) electron carriers in and out of the periplasmic membrane from the outside of the cell. As the electron carrier (e.g. NAD<sup>+</sup>) picks up an electron in the periplasmic space (i.e. being reduced to NADH) and diffuse out of the cell through the porin protein, the electron on the NADH will transfer to methylene blue (the mediator solution outside the cell). When the methylene blue is reduced to form leucomethylene blue, it turns from blue to colourless. Hence, the rate of transmission of electron carrier is calculated by the rate of reduction of methylene blue. The experiment is planned to carry out soon. The plasmids will also be transformed into <i>A. vinelandii</i> for the construction of our MFC.</p></font>
  
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">Although magnetotactic bacteria produces magnetosomes, these bacteria are notorious for the difficulty to cultivate owing to their micro-aerophilic nature. Elaborate growth techniques are required, and they are difficult to grow on the surface of agar plates, introducing problems in mutant screening [6]. </p></font>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a6/Cuhk_solutionphoto.jpg" width="400px"></center>
 +
<br>  
  
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">The lack of effective methods of DNA transfer in these microorganisms is a challenge too. Luckily, the situation is improving due to better technologies recently and some of the genes from <i>M. magnetotacticum</i> were confirmed functionally expressed in <i>Escherichia coli</i>, a common lab bacteria strain. This shows that the transcriptional and translational elements of the two microorganisms are compatible. With such good news, a number of previous iGEM teams including Kyoto-2014, OCU-China-2013, Washington-2011 and UNIK_Copenhagen-2013 have been working with transferring the magnetosome-related genes to <i>E. coli</i>. Some exciting results about the formation of magnetosome membrane in <i>E. coli</i> (by the Kyoto-2014 team) has been reported, however, never the whole magnetosome.</p></font>
 
  
<div class="photoRight">
+
<h3>References</h3>
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/ac/CUHK_Project_Azotobacter_vinelandii.jpg" height ="250px" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 20px" align="right">
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">1. Sugawara, Etsuko, Keiji Nagano, and Hiroshi Nikaido. "Factors affecting the folding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprFporin into the one-domain open conformer." MBio 1.4 (2010): e00228-10.</p></font>
<p align="right"> Figure 3: Azotobacter vinelandii </p>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">2. Yong, Yang‐Chun, et al. "Enhancement of extracellular electron transfer and bioelectricity output by synthetic porin." Biotechnology and bioengineering110.2 (2013): 408-416.</p></font>
</div>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">We wonder why magnetosomes seem so hard to be formed in <i>E. coli</i>. And then, we come up with a hypothesis - the formation of magnetosome requires <b>a micro-aerobic or anaerobic environment</b> as the magnetotatic bacteria are all living micro-aerobically. </p></font>
+
 
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">Therefore, we chose a new bacteria to work on our magnetosome project - <b><i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i></b>. </p></font>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt"><i>A. vinelandii</i> is gram-negative diazotroph (nitrogen-fixing microorganism). It is a soil bacterium related to the <i>Pseudomonas</i> genus that fixes nitrogen under aerobic conditions while having enzymatic mechanisms protecting <b>its oxygen-sensitive nitrogenase</b> from oxidative damage. This finding shows that <i>A. vinelandii</i> could be an excellent host for the production and characterization of oxygen-sensitive proteins or organelles in our case [7]. </p></font>
+
 
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">With the biggest advantage of using <i>Azotobacter</i> that it being <b>an aerobe providing an intracellular anaerobic environment</b>, we can grow it easily in normal lab conditions without expensive equipments, while fulfilling the formation criteria for magnetosome. Besides, <b>most parts in registry are compatible in <i>Azotobacter</i></b> and it is of <b>safety level group 1</b>. One more important thing is that it can conduct <b>homologous recombination for stable genome integration</b>, which is a critical process we need in our project. </p></font>
+
 
+
<h2>The Magnetosome island and the genes involved </h2>
+
 
+
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">For the synthesis of magnetosome, it is strictly controlled by a group of genes clustered in the magnetosome island (MAI). The magnetosome island comprise of four operons, namely the mms6 operon, the mamGFDC operon, mamAB and mamXY [6]. The actual size and organisation of the MAI might differ between species, but the operons seems to be highly conserved within the MAI. </p></font>
+
 
+
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">Through gene knockdown and other comprehensive experiments, researches has shown with the deletion of the mamAB operon would lead to non-magnetic phenotype. All in all, it shows the importance of the mamAB operon as it is the most responsible for magnetosome formation and have important functions such as membrane invagination, iron transport, and magnetite biomineralization [7]. </p></font>
+
+
<p<font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">>In the bacteria Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense, the mamAB operon consists of 17 genes </p></font>
+
 
+
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">(mamH, -I, -E, -J, -K, -L, -M, -N, -O, -P, -A, -Q, -R, -B, -S, -T, and -U) . </p></font>
+
 
+
 
+
<h2> How is magnetosome formed </h2>
+
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">We can look at the biosynthesis of magnetosomes as a multistep complex process. </p></font>
+
 
+
<div class="photoRight">
+
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c1/CUHK_Magnetosome_formation.jpg" width="500px" style="margin:-30px 0px 0px 20px" align="right">
+
<p align="right"> Figure 4: The overview of magnetosome formation</p>
+
</div>
+
 
+
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">First, the inner membrane of the magnetotatic bacteria swells outwards facilitating invagination of vesicles. The following step is to sort magnetosome proteins to the magnetotactic membrane.  This enables the  magnetosome membrane  to perform specific functions in the transport and accumulation of iron. Apart from that, the magnetosome membrane also plays a crucial role in  nucleation of crystallization and pH control. </p></font>
+
 
+
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">After the sorting of essential magnetosome proteins to the MM, the next step is iron uptake.
+
The need of importation of iron to make magnetite makes MTB differ from other bio-mineralizers. Iron transporters in the MM,
+
would pump Fe2+/Fe3+into the vesicle. </p></font>
+
 
+
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">Additionally,  magnetosome proteins MamM, MamB, and MamH have also been suggested as additional iron transporters for magnetite biomineralization. As the concentration of iron ions increases inside the vesicle, bio-mineralization occurs. </p></font>
+
 
+
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4pt">The process of biomineralization of magnetite is tightly regulated through specific conditions such as: pH and the concentration of iron within the vesicle. Furthermore, from research, it shows that the formation of magnetite only occurs below a threshold value of 10 millibar of atmospheric pressure. Magnetite formation is inhibited at higher oxygen concentrations. In other words, the size of particles can be limited by atmospheric pressure and oxygen concentration. It is found that at 0.25 mbar magnetite bio-mineralization can produce particles up to 42nm. As the condition rise to 10 mbar, the particle size can drop to about 20 nm.  As the biomineralization of the magnetosome is reported to be highly affected by oxygen, we propose an educated guess that magnetosome will have a higher probability to be successfully formed in our bacteria Azotobacter rather than E.coli due to its intracellular microaerobic characteristic. </p></font>
+
 
+
<font size = 12>References</font>
+
<p>
+
1. BAZYLINSKI, Dennis A.; FRANKEL, Richard B. Magnetosome formation in prokaryotes. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2004, 2.3: 217-230.
+
</p>
+
<p>
+
2. NUDELMAN, Hila; ZARIVACH, Raz. Structure prediction of magnetosome-associated proteins. Frontiers in microbiology, 2014, 5.
+
</p>
+
 
</div></center>
 
</div></center>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 01:39, 7 October 2015

Part Improvement


Background

Magnetosomes, an organelle encapsulating magnetic iron crystal, can be applied in many aspects. One of these applications is to construct a more efficient microbial fuel cell (MFC). MFC is a device which uses electrons produced by microorganism to generate electricity. If we genetically modify the bacteria Azotobacter vinelandii to have magnetosomes, magnetosomes inside them would be attracted towards the electrodes by magnetic force and in the process, bringing the whole bacteria along with it. As a result, the physical distance between the bacteria and electrodes will be decreased, thus an increase in the efficiency of the MFC as the diffusion rate for the electron to the electrode can be greatly increased.

Additionally, in the review of the previous iGEM teams, the idea of constructing an MFC has been popular. For example, the iGEM 2013 Bielefeld-Germany team also constructed an MFC. After a brief study of their project, we understood that one of their components is the oprF gene (K1172501). The team has claimed that oprF, an outer membrane porin, could increase the efficiency of MFC by allowing electron shuttle-mediated extracellular electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes.


Investigation on K1172501

However, after studying carefully, we found that the translated sequence of K1172501 contains premature stop codons. After translation, the sequence of K1172501 provided by the Bielefeld-Germany team will not be able to translate into an oprF porin protein. As the DNA sequence of K1172501 is greatly different from oprF DNA sequence from Pseudomonas fluorescens, the bacteria Germany team claimed to obtain oprF gene sequence from.


OprF in Azotobacter vinelandii

We found that OprF exists on the outer membrane of A. vinelandii, the bacteria we have been working on. Therefore we chose it to provide an alternative OprF. The sequence provided by A. vinelandii can be completely translated to form OprF with no stop codon appearing in the gene except in the last residue. Here we provide the biobrick, K1648045 and we are planning to provide K1648047 for insertion with different promoters.

Figure 1: The photo of 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1: PCR product of oprF encoding from Azotobacter vinelandii strain DJ genome.

Figure 2: Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for pSB1C3-oprF (K1648045) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.


Mutated oprF with Higher Efficiency

Furthermore, to construct a more efficient MFC, a mutated OprF with 5-point mutations is utilized. According to a paper concerning the factors affecting the conformation of OprF, we found that mutations on all 4 Cys to Ser residues, and Lys to Gly residues at 189th position (K189G; C201S; C210S; C216S; C230S) of A. vinelandii oprF would have higher probability in open-channel conformation 5 times more than WT oprF [2]. With the introduction of this mutated OprF into the bacteria, it is expected that the electron carrier diffusion into or out of the bacteria, as well as the efficiency of MFC, would be increased by 5 fold. Knowing that E. coli is capable to form porin using plasmid DNA [1], we used it to carry out the investigation on the oprF efficiency compare to K1172501, oprF from A. vinelandii and mutated OprF (K1648046).


Characterization of Different oprF

For comparison, identical promoter, J13002 (a constitutive promoter), was added before the gene in pSB1C3 for constitutive expression of different oprF in bacteria. There are K1648048 for oprF from A. vinelandii, K1648049 for mutated oprF from A. vinelandii and K1648050 for K1172501 from Germany iGEM team.

Figure 3: Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for J13002-oprF (K1648048) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.

Figure 4: Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-2: Recombination Template for R0040-oprF* (K1648049) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site.

Experiment Set-up and Ongoing Test

In the experiment, we will use the colour change of methylene blue as an indicator to compare the efficiency between the transformed bacteria with different oprF plasmids and wild type bacteria. The desired function of the oprF porin protein for this experiment is to allow the diffusion of (reduced) electron carriers in and out of the periplasmic membrane from the outside of the cell. As the electron carrier (e.g. NAD+) picks up an electron in the periplasmic space (i.e. being reduced to NADH) and diffuse out of the cell through the porin protein, the electron on the NADH will transfer to methylene blue (the mediator solution outside the cell). When the methylene blue is reduced to form leucomethylene blue, it turns from blue to colourless. Hence, the rate of transmission of electron carrier is calculated by the rate of reduction of methylene blue. The experiment is planned to carry out soon. The plasmids will also be transformed into A. vinelandii for the construction of our MFC.


References

1. Sugawara, Etsuko, Keiji Nagano, and Hiroshi Nikaido. "Factors affecting the folding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprFporin into the one-domain open conformer." MBio 1.4 (2010): e00228-10.

2. Yong, Yang‐Chun, et al. "Enhancement of extracellular electron transfer and bioelectricity output by synthetic porin." Biotechnology and bioengineering110.2 (2013): 408-416.