Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong-CUHK/Description"

 
(53 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Hong_Kong-CUHK}}
 
{{Hong_Kong-CUHK}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
<h2>ABCDE (<i><u>A</u>zoto<u>B</u>acter vinelandii</i> in <u>C</u>arbon <u>D</u>ioxide to methane <u>E</u>nergy) </h2>
+
<center><div style="text-align:justify; text-justify:inter-ideograph; width:800px">
 +
<h1>Part Improvement</h1>
 +
<br>
 +
<h2>Background</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">Magnetosomes, an organelle encapsulating magnetic iron crystal, can be applied in many aspects. One of these applications is to construct a more efficient microbial fuel cell (MFC). MFC is a device which uses electrons produced by microorganism to generate electricity. If we genetically modify the bacteria <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> to have magnetosomes, magnetosomes inside them would be attracted towards the electrodes by magnetic force and in the process, bringing the whole bacteria along with it. As a result, the physical distance between the bacteria and electrodes will be decreased, thus an increase in the efficiency of the MFC as the diffusion rate for the electron to the electrode can be greatly increased.</p>
  
<h5>Objective</h5>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">Additionally, in the review of the previous iGEM teams, the idea of constructing an MFC has been popular. For example, the iGEM 2013 Bielefeld-Germany team also constructed an MFC. After a brief study of their project, we understood that one of their components is the oprF gene (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a>). The team has claimed that oprF, an outer membrane porin, could increase the efficiency of MFC by allowing electron shuttle-mediated extracellular electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes. </p>
 +
<br>
 +
<h2>Investigation on K1172501</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">However, after studying carefully, we found that the translated sequence of <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> contains premature stop codons. After translation, the sequence of <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> provided by the Bielefeld-Germany team will not be able to translate into an oprF porin protein. As the DNA sequence of <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> is greatly different from oprF DNA sequence from <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>, the bacteria Germany team claimed to obtain oprF gene sequence from.</p></font>
 +
<br>
 +
<h2>OprF in <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i></h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">We found that OprF exists on the outer membrane of <i>A. vinelandii</i>, the bacteria we have been working on. Therefore we chose it to provide an alternative OprF. The sequence provided by <i>A. vinelandii</i> can be completely translated to form OprF with no stop codon appearing in the gene except in the last residue. Here we provide the biobrick, <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648045">K1648045</a> and we are planning to provide <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648047">K1648047</a> for insertion with different promoters.</p>
  
<p>This project utilize modified nitrogenase in <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> to convert carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) to methane (CH<sub>4</sub>).It is hoped to produce a fuel while fixing carbon.</p>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/31/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto3.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 1:</b> The photo of 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1: PCR product of oprF encoding from <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> strain DJ genome.</p>
  
<h5>Background and Significance</h5>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/5b/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto4.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 2:</b> Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for pSB1C3-oprF (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648045">K1648045</a>) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.</p>
  
<p>With the exploitation of carbon-based fossil fuels, we sought for an alternative solution to combat the global energy crisis by utilizing a gas pollutant – CO<sub>2</sub> - through carbon fixation. To maintain current living standard, alternative energy sources are unprecedentedly demanding. We are now engineering a bacteria <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> to convert CO<sub>2</sub> into CH<sub>4</sub> inside the bacteria <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i>. <i>A. vinelandii</i> is a facultative aerobe with an intracellular anaerobic environment which is essential for the reduction reactions.</p>
+
<br>
  
<h5>Why CH<sub>4</sub>?</h5>
+
<h2>Mutated oprF with Higher Efficiency</h2>
<p>CH<sub>4</sub> produced can serve as a fuel and any CO<sub>2</sub> produced during the process can be returned to the system to CH<sub>4</sub> generation. Comparing to hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>), a popular alternative energy source, because of its "cleanliness" after combustion, from the perspective of fuel storage, storage of CH<sub>4</sub> is cheaper than that of H<sub>2</sub> due to a lower boiling point. Thus it requires less energy to liquefy.  Our engineered bacteria would also be able to convert the greenhouse gas CO<sub>2</sub> into CH<sub>4</sub> in closed systems, which eliminates the disadvantage of using CH<sub>4</sub> as a fuel. Additionally, no change needed to be made on current car engines, which are designed to use of hydrocarbon fuels. </p>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">Furthermore, to construct a more efficient MFC, a mutated OprF with 5-point mutations is utilized. According to a paper concerning the factors affecting the conformation of OprF, we found that mutations on all 4 Cys to Ser residues, and Lys to Gly residues at 189<sup>th</sup> position (K189G; C201S; C210S; C216S; C230S) of <i>A. vinelandii</i> oprF would have higher probability in open-channel conformation 5 times more than WT oprF [2]. With the introduction of this mutated OprF into the bacteria, it is expected that the electron carrier diffusion into or out of the bacteria, as well as the efficiency of MFC, would be increased by 5 fold. Knowing that <i>E. coli</i> is capable to form porin using plasmid DNA [1], we used it to carry out the investigation on the oprF efficiency compare to <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a>, oprF from <i>A. vinelandii</i> and mutated OprF (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648046">K1648046</a>).</p>
 +
<br>
  
 +
<h2>Characterization of Different oprF</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">For comparison, identical promoter, J13002 (a constitutive promoter), was added before the gene in pSB1C3 for constitutive expression of different oprF in bacteria. There are <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648048">K1648048</a> for oprF from <i>A. vinelandii</i>, <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648049">K1648049</a> for mutated oprF from <i>A. vinelandii</i> and <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648050">K1648050</a> for <a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1172501">K1172501</a> from Germany iGEM team.</p>
  
<h5>Goal to be achieved</h5>
 
<p>From literatures, we found out that the carbon fixation process is not efficient enough, as most energy is wasted in H<sub>2</sub> production. Therefore, we are tackling the fixation efficiency through two approaches: (1) the enhancing H<sub>2</sub> reaction chain, and (2) increasing intracellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration.</p>
 
  
<br />
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/c/c6/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto2.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 3:</b> Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for J13002-oprF (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648048">K1648048</a>) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.</p>
  
<h2> MNOPQ (<u>M</u>agnetic <u>N</u>anoparticles <u>O</u>n <u>P</u>articular re<u>Q</u>uirement) </h2>
+
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/11/Cuhk_partimprovementgenephoto1.jpg"></center>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.2em; font-size:12px"><b>Figure 4:</b> Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-2: Recombination Template for R0040-oprF* (<a href="parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1648049">K1648049</a>) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site.
 +
<br><br>
  
 +
<h2>Experiment Set-up and Ongoing Test</h2>
 +
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">In the experiment, we will use the colour change of methylene blue as an indicator to compare the efficiency between the transformed bacteria with different oprF plasmids and wild type bacteria. The desired function of the oprF porin protein for this experiment is to allow the diffusion of (reduced) electron carriers in and out of the periplasmic membrane from the outside of the cell. As the electron carrier (e.g. NAD<sup>+</sup>) picks up an electron in the periplasmic space (i.e. being reduced to NADH) and diffuse out of the cell through the porin protein, the electron on the NADH will transfer to methylene blue (the mediator solution outside the cell). When the methylene blue is reduced to form leucomethylene blue, it turns from blue to colourless. Hence, the rate of transmission of electron carrier is calculated by the rate of reduction of methylene blue. The experiment is planned to carry out soon. The plasmids will also be transformed into <i>A. vinelandii</i> for the construction of our MFC.</p></font>
  
 +
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a6/Cuhk_solutionphoto.jpg" width="400px"></center>
 +
<br>
  
<h5>Objective</h5>
 
  
<p>We aim to produce magnetic nanoparticles to meet certain requirements. <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> is also used in this project because it provides an intracellular anaerobic condition that is essential for the production processes. </p>
+
<h3>References</h3>
 
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">1. Sugawara, Etsuko, Keiji Nagano, and Hiroshi Nikaido. "Factors affecting the folding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprFporin into the one-domain open conformer." MBio 1.4 (2010): e00228-10.</p></font>
<h5>Background and Significance</h5>
+
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5em">2. Yong, Yang‐Chun, et al. "Enhancement of extracellular electron transfer and bioelectricity output by synthetic porin." Biotechnology and bioengineering110.2 (2013): 408-416.</p></font>
<p>Magnetosome is an organelle with magnetic iron crystal (magnetite) by lipid bilayer which is originated from bacteria such as <i>Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense</i>. It serves as a navigational device in magnetotactic bacteria by interacting with the Earth magnetic field. Magnetic beads formed could be applied in various aspects.
+
</div></center>
 
+
Biomolecules, such as enzymes and antibodies, can be expressed on the magnetosome so that they can be easily controlled by magnet for specific purposes. </p>
+
 
+
<p>Unfortunately, most of the magnetotactic bacteria require microaerobic conditions for magnetosome biogenesis, which is hard to maintain with normal lab equipment. We are transferring essential genes for magnetosome formation into <i>A. vinelandii</i>, a facultative aerobe with an intracellular anaerobic environment, in the hope of producing magnetic beads with functional biomolecules under aerobic conditions with greater yield. We are also modifying the transmembrane protein presented on magnetosome membrane by fusing with biomolecules. Reactions could be more accelerated as the magnetic beads generated magnetosome provides a greater surface area to volume ratio than that artificial magnetic beads. </p>
+
 
+
 
+
<h5>Applications</h5>
+
<p>One of the applications is to use engineered magnetites to capture heavy metal ion in water. Different kinds of heavy metal ions such as Pb, Cu and Ni are found in marine system. By expressing different heavy metal binding proteins onto magnetic beads, heavy metal ions could be captured and be easily removed by magnet. It is better than the previous methods, in terms of operating cost, efficiency and eco-friendliness.  
+
</p>
+
We are also adding antibodies on magnetosome for immunoprecipitation. Due to the smaller size of magnetosome than traditional magnetic beads, magnetosome with antibodies could have a higher binding efficiency. Also, the antibodies containing magnetic beads can be massively produced in bacteria.
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 01:39, 7 October 2015

Part Improvement


Background

Magnetosomes, an organelle encapsulating magnetic iron crystal, can be applied in many aspects. One of these applications is to construct a more efficient microbial fuel cell (MFC). MFC is a device which uses electrons produced by microorganism to generate electricity. If we genetically modify the bacteria Azotobacter vinelandii to have magnetosomes, magnetosomes inside them would be attracted towards the electrodes by magnetic force and in the process, bringing the whole bacteria along with it. As a result, the physical distance between the bacteria and electrodes will be decreased, thus an increase in the efficiency of the MFC as the diffusion rate for the electron to the electrode can be greatly increased.

Additionally, in the review of the previous iGEM teams, the idea of constructing an MFC has been popular. For example, the iGEM 2013 Bielefeld-Germany team also constructed an MFC. After a brief study of their project, we understood that one of their components is the oprF gene (K1172501). The team has claimed that oprF, an outer membrane porin, could increase the efficiency of MFC by allowing electron shuttle-mediated extracellular electron transfer from bacteria to electrodes.


Investigation on K1172501

However, after studying carefully, we found that the translated sequence of K1172501 contains premature stop codons. After translation, the sequence of K1172501 provided by the Bielefeld-Germany team will not be able to translate into an oprF porin protein. As the DNA sequence of K1172501 is greatly different from oprF DNA sequence from Pseudomonas fluorescens, the bacteria Germany team claimed to obtain oprF gene sequence from.


OprF in Azotobacter vinelandii

We found that OprF exists on the outer membrane of A. vinelandii, the bacteria we have been working on. Therefore we chose it to provide an alternative OprF. The sequence provided by A. vinelandii can be completely translated to form OprF with no stop codon appearing in the gene except in the last residue. Here we provide the biobrick, K1648045 and we are planning to provide K1648047 for insertion with different promoters.

Figure 1: The photo of 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1: PCR product of oprF encoding from Azotobacter vinelandii strain DJ genome.

Figure 2: Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for pSB1C3-oprF (K1648045) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.


Mutated oprF with Higher Efficiency

Furthermore, to construct a more efficient MFC, a mutated OprF with 5-point mutations is utilized. According to a paper concerning the factors affecting the conformation of OprF, we found that mutations on all 4 Cys to Ser residues, and Lys to Gly residues at 189th position (K189G; C201S; C210S; C216S; C230S) of A. vinelandii oprF would have higher probability in open-channel conformation 5 times more than WT oprF [2]. With the introduction of this mutated OprF into the bacteria, it is expected that the electron carrier diffusion into or out of the bacteria, as well as the efficiency of MFC, would be increased by 5 fold. Knowing that E. coli is capable to form porin using plasmid DNA [1], we used it to carry out the investigation on the oprF efficiency compare to K1172501, oprF from A. vinelandii and mutated OprF (K1648046).


Characterization of Different oprF

For comparison, identical promoter, J13002 (a constitutive promoter), was added before the gene in pSB1C3 for constitutive expression of different oprF in bacteria. There are K1648048 for oprF from A. vinelandii, K1648049 for mutated oprF from A. vinelandii and K1648050 for K1172501 from Germany iGEM team.

Figure 3: Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-3: Recombination Template for J13002-oprF (K1648048) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site; without digestion.

Figure 4: Checking of recombinant plasmid using double digestion. L: DNA ladder. Lane 1-2: Recombination Template for R0040-oprF* (K1648049) with double digestion cut at EcoRI and PstI sites; with single digestion at PstI site.

Experiment Set-up and Ongoing Test

In the experiment, we will use the colour change of methylene blue as an indicator to compare the efficiency between the transformed bacteria with different oprF plasmids and wild type bacteria. The desired function of the oprF porin protein for this experiment is to allow the diffusion of (reduced) electron carriers in and out of the periplasmic membrane from the outside of the cell. As the electron carrier (e.g. NAD+) picks up an electron in the periplasmic space (i.e. being reduced to NADH) and diffuse out of the cell through the porin protein, the electron on the NADH will transfer to methylene blue (the mediator solution outside the cell). When the methylene blue is reduced to form leucomethylene blue, it turns from blue to colourless. Hence, the rate of transmission of electron carrier is calculated by the rate of reduction of methylene blue. The experiment is planned to carry out soon. The plasmids will also be transformed into A. vinelandii for the construction of our MFC.


References

1. Sugawara, Etsuko, Keiji Nagano, and Hiroshi Nikaido. "Factors affecting the folding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprFporin into the one-domain open conformer." MBio 1.4 (2010): e00228-10.

2. Yong, Yang‐Chun, et al. "Enhancement of extracellular electron transfer and bioelectricity output by synthetic porin." Biotechnology and bioengineering110.2 (2013): 408-416.