Difference between revisions of "Team:Waterloo/Results"

m
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Waterloo}}
 
{{Waterloo}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
<div id ="mainContainer">
+
<div class="container main-container">
<div id ="contentContainer">
+
  
     <h1>CRISPieR: re-engineering CRISPR-Cas9 with functional applications in eukaryotic systems</h1>
+
     <h1>Results</h1>
 +
<p>The Waterloo iGEM team was able to achieve results for all three project focus areas. This page offers a general summary, while more details can be found on our <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Waterloo/Lab_Overview">wet lab overview</a>, <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Waterloo/Modeling">mathematical modelling</a> and <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Waterloo/Practices">policy & human practices</a> overview pages.</p>
  
    <section id="motivation">
+
  <figure style="float:left; max-width:30%; width:150px;">
        <h2>Motivation</h2>
+
      <img src="/wiki/images/8/85/Waterloo_sgrnaexchangeicon.png" alt="sgRNA Exchange Icon" />
        <p>
+
  </figure>
            The CRISPR-Cas9 system is an astounding tool with many applications in synthetic biology. Since its popularization a few years ago, CRISPR papers have flooded major journals and many iGEM teams have worked to improve its use as a genome editing tool. The 2015 Waterloo team is taking a three-pronged approach to expand upon previous research for wider, more efficient, and more flexible use of CRISPR-Cas9.
+
<p>For the Simple sgRNA Exchange, we were able to show that adding restriction sites and a single mutation in the scaffold region of the sgRNA <strong>did not reduce targeting</strong> of the sgRNA in CRISPR dCas9 system. The graphs of flow cytometry data can be seen below and more details on the results are available on the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Waterloo/Lab/sgRNA">sgRNA Exchange page</a>.</p>
        </p>
+
        <p>
+
            We aim to make target selection and guide sequence replacement physically easier in the lab. To target a DNA sequence, a single guide RNA (sgRNA) is used to identify a match. Each sgRNA can only have one intended target, however, which forces us to re-synthesize and re-clone the entire sgRNA sequence for each new target we'd like to test. By being able to swap out a 20 base pair section of the sgRNA sequences, instead of synthesizing new targets from scratch, we hope to reduce the turnaround time for using CRISPR to target different sequences.
+
        </p>
+
        <p>
+
            By building on recent papers, such as Kleinstiver et al., 2015, we are trying to make Cas9’s binding to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site more flexible. The standard S. pyogenes type II CRISPR-Cas9 binds to a PAM of length 3, namely NGG. While this is fairly general, requiring that this sequence be next to the target sequence limits where Cas9 can cut. We will produce a model that suggests Cas9 variants and their preferred PAM sites, and we will attempt to demonstrate this model’s validity. The overarching goal is to create Cas9 variants that will bind to any desired PAM site, and we hope to take some steps forward to make that goal more achievable and directed.
+
        </p>
+
        <p>
+
            Finally, CRISPR originated as a viral defence mechanism for bacteria, for specific and targeted immunity. Multi-cellular organisms have developed their own defenses to achieve this goal, but from our research it appears that groups have not publicly attempted to introduce CRISPR as an antiviral mechanism in multicellular organisms. Our team is attempting to use the CRISPR system in plants to discover whether it can defend against a class of double-stranded DNA viruses.
+
        </p>
+
    </section>
+
  
    <section id="sgRNA">
+
        <figure>
        <h2>sgRNA Modification</h2>
+
            <img src="/wiki/images/0/09/Waterloo_flowcytometryresults.png" alt="CRISPR-Cas9 structure and project overview" />
        <p>
+
            <figcaption>RFP Intensity after targeting with dCas9 + standard sgRNA and dCas9 + modified sgRNA in blue. Non-targeted RFP control measurements are shown in grey. Replicate measurements taken on three separate days are overlayed on the same axes.</figcaption>
            Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
+
        </figure>
        </p>
+
    </section>
+
  
    <section id="cas9">
+
<figure style="float:left; max-width:30%; width:150px;">
        <h2>Cas9 Modification</h2>
+
            <img src="/wiki/images/7/72/Waterloo_pamflexeicon.png" alt="Pam Exchange Icon" />
        <p>
+
</figure>
            Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
+
<p>
        </p>
+
A software pipeline was developed to determine the PAM-binding selectivity of variant Cas9 proteins. The PyRosetta molecular dynamics software suite was used to perform an energy minimization at the interface of the protein structure and the DNA PAM site structure. The energy minimization provided a score that was then compared to the results of empirical characterization of mutant PAM selectivity <cite ref="Kleinstiver2015"></cite>. The pipeline is described in more detail on the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Waterloo/Modeling/PAM_Flexibility">Pam Flexibility</a> page and is visualized below.
    </section>
+
</p>
 +
        <figure>
 +
            <img src="/wiki/images/2/29/Waterloo_pamflex_pipeline.png" alt="Pipeline showing computational approcah" />
 +
            <figcaption>PAM Flexibility software pipeline: the 3D Cas9 structure is mutated, then 256 variants with different PAM DNA structures are created, then PyRosetta is used to score PAM affinities.</figcaption>
 +
        </figure>
  
    <section id="plants">
+
<p>
        <h2>Plant Viral Defence</h2>
+
In addition, we mutated dCas9 at three sites 1135, 1335, and 1337 to alter its PAM site from native NGG to NGAG using the Quick Change protocol. The mutations were confirmed using sequencing. Preliminary experiments were done using sgRNA targeting the J23101 promoter upstream of the GFP using NGAG PAM site, however the results, graphed below, were inconclusive. It was expected that the original dCas9 would target NGG but not NGAG, while the modified dCas9 would target NGAG but not NGG. Instead roughly the same signal was measured for both dCas9 variants at both target sites.
        <p>
+
</p>
            Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
+
        </p>
+
    </section>
+
  
 +
        <figure>
 +
            <img src="/wiki/images/9/95/Waterloo_pamflexlabresults.png" alt="Bar graphs showing results from dCas9 targeting" />
 +
            <figcaption>Mean RFP Intensity after targeting an NGAG and NGG PAM site (using different complementary sgRNA sequences) with both dCas9 and the modified dCas9 variant.</figcaption>
 +
        </figure>
  
    <div class="prevHighlightBox">
+
<p>
        <h5>What should this page contain?</h5>
+
<figure style="float:left; max-width:30%; width:150px;">
        <ul>
+
  <img src="/wiki/images/7/73/Waterloo_plantdefenseicon.png" alt="Plant Defense Icon" />
            <li> A clear and concise description of your project.</li>
+
</figure>
            <li>A detailed explanation of why your team chose to work on this particular project.</li>
+
            <li>References and sources to document your research.</li>
+
            <li>Use illustrations and other visual resources to explain your project.</li>
+
        </ul>
+
  
 +
<p>
 +
The wet lab was able to agroinfiltrate a pCAMBIA + sgRNA vector into <em>Arabidopsis</em>, but the generation time of the plant prevented proper testing and verification of the results. However, a protoplast model was used that demonstrated successful expression of Cas9 in plant cells, as shown on the dot blot below.
 +
</p>
  
         <br />
+
         <figure>
        <h4>Advice on writing your Project Description</h4>
+
            <img src="/wiki//images/b/bd/Waterloo_dotblotresults.png" alt="Cas9 expression shown in protoplasts using dot blots" />
 +
            <figcaption>Two dot blots using anti-Cas9 antibody demonstrate protoplast expression. Top row is chemiluminescence, bottom row is visible light.</figcaption>
 +
        </figure>
  
        <p>We encourage you to put up a lot of information and content on your wiki, but we also encourage you to include summaries as much as possible. If you think of the sections in your project description as the sections in a publication, you should try to be consist, accurate and unambiguous in your achievements.</p>
 
  
        <p>Judges like to read your wiki and know exactly what you have achieved. This is how you should think about these sections; from the point of view of the judge evaluating you at the end of the year.</p>
+
<p>
 +
Mathematical models are not limited by the same time constraints as growing plants, so they were used to validate the CRISPR Plant Defense aspect of our project. The team created a multi-scale model that showed the effect of CRISPR/Cas9 on viral genomes, viral replication and viral spread across multiple plant cells.
 +
</p>
 +
<p>
 +
A stochastic model of Cas9 cleavage was able to estimate the effects of CRISPR-Cas9 on the viral genome. Averaging over many simulations, it was apparent that the loss-of-function in viral genomes could be expected to follow an exponential trend. The viral genomes were then simulated with an exponential decay from functional to non-functional forms.
 +
</p>
  
 +
        <figure>
 +
            <img src="/wiki/images/a/a4/Waterloo_p6_fit.png" alt="Exponential decay of functional viral genomes to non-functional genomes" />
 +
            <figcaption>CRISPR effect parameter (t1/2) is derived from an exponential fit to the fraction of CaMV genomes active at each timestep across 1000 stochastic genome simulations.</figcaption>
 +
        </figure>
  
        <br />
+
<p>
        <h4>References</h4>
+
The CRISPR effect parameter (t1/2) is passed on to a model of the intracellular viral replication cycle. This model determines the time-series and steady state virion concentration. This virion concentration was impacted by plant defenses such as RNA silencing and our CRISPR system. The number of virions present in one cell over time, with a changing CRISPR parameter from the biological parameter to one that might be achieved with an optimized CRISPieR system, is illustrated in the figures below.
        <p>iGEM teams are encouraged to record references you use during the course of your research. They should be posted somewhere on your wiki so that judges and other visitors can see how you though about your project and what works inspired you.</p>
+
</p>
  
 +
        <figure>
 +
            <img src="/wiki/images/3/38/Waterloo_CRISPRCRISPieRtimeseries.png" alt="Time series of functional and non-functional virions in the cell in the presence of CRISPR and CRISPieR systems."/>
 +
            <figcaption>Replication model shows total CaMV virions within a cell over time with and without a CRISPR/CRISPieR defense system.  Non-functional virion production is lowered because fewer functional proteins that protect against RNAi are produced.</figcaption>
 +
        </figure>
  
 +
<p>Both the time series data and heat maps highlight how the CRISPR genome modification has a greater effect on the virion concentration than the plant defenses alone. These results were then carried forward into an agent-based model on the level of plant leaves, discussed in detail on the <a href="https://2015.igem.org/Team:Waterloo/Modeling/Intercellular_Spread">Intracellular Spread</a> page.
 +
</p>
  
        <h4>Inspiration</h4>
 
        <p>See how other teams have described and presented their projects: </p>
 
  
        <ul>
 
            <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Imperial/Project"> Imperial</a></li>
 
            <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:UC_Davis/Project_Overview"> UC Davis</a></li>
 
            <li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:SYSU-Software/Overview">SYSU Software</a></li>
 
        </ul>
 
    </div>
 
 
</div>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
{{Waterloo_Footer}}
 
{{Waterloo_Footer}}

Latest revision as of 01:29, 21 November 2015

Results

The Waterloo iGEM team was able to achieve results for all three project focus areas. This page offers a general summary, while more details can be found on our wet lab overview, mathematical modelling and policy & human practices overview pages.

sgRNA Exchange Icon

For the Simple sgRNA Exchange, we were able to show that adding restriction sites and a single mutation in the scaffold region of the sgRNA did not reduce targeting of the sgRNA in CRISPR dCas9 system. The graphs of flow cytometry data can be seen below and more details on the results are available on the sgRNA Exchange page.

CRISPR-Cas9 structure and project overview
RFP Intensity after targeting with dCas9 + standard sgRNA and dCas9 + modified sgRNA in blue. Non-targeted RFP control measurements are shown in grey. Replicate measurements taken on three separate days are overlayed on the same axes.
Pam Exchange Icon

A software pipeline was developed to determine the PAM-binding selectivity of variant Cas9 proteins. The PyRosetta molecular dynamics software suite was used to perform an energy minimization at the interface of the protein structure and the DNA PAM site structure. The energy minimization provided a score that was then compared to the results of empirical characterization of mutant PAM selectivity . The pipeline is described in more detail on the Pam Flexibility page and is visualized below.

Pipeline showing computational approcah
PAM Flexibility software pipeline: the 3D Cas9 structure is mutated, then 256 variants with different PAM DNA structures are created, then PyRosetta is used to score PAM affinities.

In addition, we mutated dCas9 at three sites 1135, 1335, and 1337 to alter its PAM site from native NGG to NGAG using the Quick Change protocol. The mutations were confirmed using sequencing. Preliminary experiments were done using sgRNA targeting the J23101 promoter upstream of the GFP using NGAG PAM site, however the results, graphed below, were inconclusive. It was expected that the original dCas9 would target NGG but not NGAG, while the modified dCas9 would target NGAG but not NGG. Instead roughly the same signal was measured for both dCas9 variants at both target sites.

Bar graphs showing results from dCas9 targeting
Mean RFP Intensity after targeting an NGAG and NGG PAM site (using different complementary sgRNA sequences) with both dCas9 and the modified dCas9 variant.

Plant Defense Icon

The wet lab was able to agroinfiltrate a pCAMBIA + sgRNA vector into Arabidopsis, but the generation time of the plant prevented proper testing and verification of the results. However, a protoplast model was used that demonstrated successful expression of Cas9 in plant cells, as shown on the dot blot below.

Cas9 expression shown in protoplasts using dot blots
Two dot blots using anti-Cas9 antibody demonstrate protoplast expression. Top row is chemiluminescence, bottom row is visible light.

Mathematical models are not limited by the same time constraints as growing plants, so they were used to validate the CRISPR Plant Defense aspect of our project. The team created a multi-scale model that showed the effect of CRISPR/Cas9 on viral genomes, viral replication and viral spread across multiple plant cells.

A stochastic model of Cas9 cleavage was able to estimate the effects of CRISPR-Cas9 on the viral genome. Averaging over many simulations, it was apparent that the loss-of-function in viral genomes could be expected to follow an exponential trend. The viral genomes were then simulated with an exponential decay from functional to non-functional forms.

Exponential decay of functional viral genomes to non-functional genomes
CRISPR effect parameter (t1/2) is derived from an exponential fit to the fraction of CaMV genomes active at each timestep across 1000 stochastic genome simulations.

The CRISPR effect parameter (t1/2) is passed on to a model of the intracellular viral replication cycle. This model determines the time-series and steady state virion concentration. This virion concentration was impacted by plant defenses such as RNA silencing and our CRISPR system. The number of virions present in one cell over time, with a changing CRISPR parameter from the biological parameter to one that might be achieved with an optimized CRISPieR system, is illustrated in the figures below.

Time series of functional and non-functional virions in the cell in the presence of CRISPR and CRISPieR systems.
Replication model shows total CaMV virions within a cell over time with and without a CRISPR/CRISPieR defense system. Non-functional virion production is lowered because fewer functional proteins that protect against RNAi are produced.

Both the time series data and heat maps highlight how the CRISPR genome modification has a greater effect on the virion concentration than the plant defenses alone. These results were then carried forward into an agent-based model on the level of plant leaves, discussed in detail on the Intracellular Spread page.

Top