Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong-CUHK/Description"
S1155046866 (Talk | contribs) |
S1155046866 (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<p>With the exploitation of carbon based fossil fuels, we sought for an alternative solution to combat the global energy crisis by utilizing a gas pollutant – CO2 through carbon fixation. To maintain current living standard, alternative energy sources are unprecedentedly demanding. We are now engineering a bacteria <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> to econvert CO2 into CH4 inside the bacteria Azotobacter vinelandii. <i>A.vinelandii</i> is a facultative areobe with an intracellular anaerobic environment which is essential for the reduction reactions.</p> | <p>With the exploitation of carbon based fossil fuels, we sought for an alternative solution to combat the global energy crisis by utilizing a gas pollutant – CO2 through carbon fixation. To maintain current living standard, alternative energy sources are unprecedentedly demanding. We are now engineering a bacteria <i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i> to econvert CO2 into CH4 inside the bacteria Azotobacter vinelandii. <i>A.vinelandii</i> is a facultative areobe with an intracellular anaerobic environment which is essential for the reduction reactions.</p> | ||
− | <h5>Why CH4</h5> | + | <h5>Why CH4?</h5> |
<p>CH4 produced can serve as a fuel and any CO2 produced during the process can be returned to the system to CH4 generation. Comparing to hydrogen(H2), a popular alternative energy source, because of its "cleanliness after combustion, from the perspective of fuel storage, storage of CH4 is cheaper than that of H2 due to a lower boiling point. Thus it requires less energy to liquefy. Our engineered bacteria would also be able to convert the greenhouse gas CO2 into CH4 in closed systems, which eliminates the disadvantage of using CH4 as a fuel. Additionally, no change needed to be made on current car engines, which are designed to use of hydrocarbon fuels. </p> | <p>CH4 produced can serve as a fuel and any CO2 produced during the process can be returned to the system to CH4 generation. Comparing to hydrogen(H2), a popular alternative energy source, because of its "cleanliness after combustion, from the perspective of fuel storage, storage of CH4 is cheaper than that of H2 due to a lower boiling point. Thus it requires less energy to liquefy. Our engineered bacteria would also be able to convert the greenhouse gas CO2 into CH4 in closed systems, which eliminates the disadvantage of using CH4 as a fuel. Additionally, no change needed to be made on current car engines, which are designed to use of hydrocarbon fuels. </p> | ||
Revision as of 18:52, 14 July 2015