Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/PlasmidDisplay"

Line 155: Line 155:
 
             <div id="collapseSix" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
             <div id="collapseSix" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
                     <p>...</p>
+
                     <p>
 +
<ul>
 +
    <li>Development of the plasmid repressor interaction assay (PRIA)</li>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>After every step the reaction vessel were centrifuged with 1000 <i>g</i> for 1 minute. The DNA amount of the supernatant after centrifugation was analyzed via nanodrop. </li>
 +
        <li>As negative controls we did not add protein to the agarose in one sample and no plasmid in another sample.</li>
 +
        <li>We tested the interaction of lacI wit lac promoter and lac operator.</li>
 +
        <li>We also performed the assay at 0 °C and 37 °C</li>
 +
        <li>Steps: </li>
 +
        <ul>
 +
            <li>25 µL Ni-NTA agarose was put in a reaction vessel. Then centrifuge. </li>
 +
            <li>The agarose was washed three times with Kpi buffer. </li>
 +
            <li>10 µg protein (we used lac Repressor with a His-Tag as model protein) in 20 µL Kpi buffer were added and incubated for 30 min.  Then the agarose were centrifuged.  </li>
 +
            <li>The agarose was incubated three times in Kpi Buffer (75 µL).</li>
 +
            <li>1,5 µg plasmid (lacO) was mixed with 20 µL binding buffer and incubated for 15 minutes. </li>
 +
            <li>Unbound DNA was washed away three times. </li>
 +
            <li>3x elution with binding buffer and analytes (for this experiment: IPTG)</li>
 +
            <li>Imidazol was used to release proteins from the agarose. </li>
 +
        </ul>
 +
        <li>No results! DNA concentration could not be measured. Next time: analysis with gelelectrophoresis.</li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
</ul>
 +
</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
Line 167: Line 189:
 
             <div id="collapseSeven" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
             <div id="collapseSeven" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
                     <p>...</p>
+
                     <p>
 +
<ul>
 +
    <li>Plasmid isolation of <i>E. coli</i> KRX with pSB1C3-lacO </li>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>Concentration: 186,3 ng/µL</li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
    <li>Suffix insertion: lacI-LVA as insert and pSB1C3-T7-RBS as backbone</li>
 +
    <li>Optimizing PRIA</li>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li> The DNA amount of the supernatant after centrifugation was analyzed via gelelectrophoresis.</li>
 +
        <li>Repetition of the assay performed before</li>
 +
<li>In the figure we could detect DNA after staining in ethidium bromide. </li>
 +
        <li>A high DNA amount was unbound.</li>
 +
        <li>Elution with IPTG possible. DNA could be detected after adding the analyte solution to the agarose.<</li>
 +
        <li>We did not see any difference between the temperatures.</li>
 +
        <li>Not adding protein to the agarose is a good negative control.</li>
 +
        <li>The rest of the agarose after the final step was dissolved in 10 µL water and also used for the analysis via gelelectrophorese.</li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
    <li>Verification of protein amount in the supernatant of every step in the assay.</li>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>Detection via SDS-PAGE</li>
 +
        <li>No protein detected.</li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
</ul>
 +
</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
Line 179: Line 225:
 
             <div id="collapseEight" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
             <div id="collapseEight" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
                     <p>...</p>
+
                     <p>
 +
<ul>
 +
    <li>Testing analyte solution with different concentrations</li>
 +
        <ul>
 +
            <li>We wanted to test 0.05 mM, 0.5 mM and 5 mM IPTG mixed with binding buffer as elution buffer. </li>
 +
            <li>No effect of the different IPTG concentration to the eluted DNA amount. </li>
 +
        </ul>
 +
    <li>We standardized our assay. Every step took 15 minutes and the volume of the added solutions are 50 µL.</li>
 +
    <li>Restriction of pSB1A3, pSB1C3-lacI-LVA and pSB1C3-T7-RBS</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
Line 191: Line 247:
 
             <div id="collapseNine" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
             <div id="collapseNine" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
                     <p>...</p>
+
                     <p>
 +
<ul>
 +
    <li>Interaction study of lacI-lacO</li>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>We did an electrophoretic mass shift assay with lacO and lacI</li>
 +
        #Probeauftragung+Bild?
 +
        <li>It did not work. Next time: titration of the plasmid. </li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
</ul>
 +
 
 +
</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
Line 203: Line 269:
 
             <div id="collapseTen" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
             <div id="collapseTen" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
                     <p>...</p>
+
                     <p>
 +
<ul>
 +
    <li>Repetition of EMSA for lacO-lacI interaction </li>
 +
    <li>Optimizing PRIA with different salt concentrations</li>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>Concentrations 100 mM, 250 mM and 500 mM KCl in binding buffer were tested in PRIA.</li>
 +
        <li>Using binding buffer with 500 mM KCl was best for PRIA. </li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>96 well plate as new system for PRIA</li>
 +
        <li>Unspecific binding of lacI.</li>
 +
        <li>No elution of lacO. DNA was unbound. </li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
    <li></li>
 +
</ul>
 +
 
 +
</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
Line 215: Line 297:
 
             <div id="collapseEleven" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
             <div id="collapseEleven" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
                     <p>...</p>
+
                     <p>
 +
<ul>
 +
    <li>PRIA with different salt concentrations and creating a complex formation first before adding to the agarose</li>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>We tried to create the complex of lacO and lacI first and then bound it on the agarose. </li>
 +
        <li>We tested higher salt concentrations (0.5 M, 0.75 M, 1 M, 2 M KCl) in binding buffer. Moreover, we examined whether we could also utilize sodium chloride. </li>
 +
  </ul>
 +
    <li>Cloning of pSB1C3_T7-RBS-lacI-His</li>
 +
    <ul><li>Transformation of pSB1C3_T7-RBS-lacI-Histag in E. coli KRX was successful.
 +
Colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures. </li></ul>
 +
</ul>
 +
</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
Line 228: Line 321:
 
             <div id="collapseTwelve" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
             <div id="collapseTwelve" class="panel-collapse collapse">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
 
                 <div class="panel-body">
                     <p>...</p>
+
                     <p>
 +
<ul>
 +
    <li>Repetition of EMSA</li>
 +
    <li>Test to bind DNA in filter paper</li>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>The test was done to look whether DNA can be washed out. </li>
 +
        <li>3 µL DNA was applied on a filter paper strip. Then the filter paper was stained with GelRed. </li>
 +
        <li>For the negative control, a filter paper strip without DNA was stained with GelRed. </li>
 +
        <li>No detection of DNA possible. Reason for no detection was that the intrinsic signal of the strip was too high. </li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
    <li>We transformed BioBrick Bba_K1321340 from the distribution.
 +
        <ul>
 +
            <li>Transformation of Biobrick Bba_K1321340 in <i>E. coli</i> KRX</li>
 +
            <li>Colony PCR of 5 clones on the agarplate after transformation. </li>
 +
            <li>5 colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures. </li>
 +
            <li>Plasmid isolation</li>
 +
            <li>Digestion with EcoRI and PstI for screening</li>
 +
        </ul>
 +
    <li>We wanted to develop two new assays. </li>
 +
        <ul>
 +
<li>One assay is based on GFP labeled protein and immobilized DNA (with Cy3 and amino label) on filter paper. The other one is based on immobilized protein (contains a cellulose binding domain) and Cy3 labeled DNA.
 +
</li>
 +
        </ul>
 +
<li>Primer design for cloning CBD and sfGFP to the devices arsR, blcR and lacI.</li>
 +
    <li>These are the devices we wanted to clone: </li>
 +
    <ul>
 +
        <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-lacI-sfGFP-His</li>
 +
        <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-arsR-sfGFP-His</li>
 +
        <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-lacI-sfGFP-His</li>
 +
        <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-arsR-CBD</li>
 +
        <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-blcR-CBD</li>
 +
        <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-blcR-CBD</li>
 +
        <li>Cy3- and amino-labeled lacO</li>
 +
        <li>Cy3- and amino-labeled arsR</li>
 +
        <li>Cy3- and amino-labeled blc promoter</li>
 +
    </ul>
 +
</ul>
 +
 
 +
</p>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>

Revision as of 21:40, 20 August 2015

iGEM Bielefeld 2015


Heavy metals Date rape drugs CFPS PRIA Miscellaneous

Plasmid Repressor Interaction Assay



  • Heat shock transformation of Biobricks needed for further assays was performed. Glycerol stocks were generated and the plasmids isolated according to the kits manual. The relevant Biobricks were:

    • BBa_K525998: T7 promotor and RBS
    • BBa_C0012: lacI repressor with LVA Tag
    • BBa_R0010: lac Promotor
    • BBa_K592008: lac Operator

  • Furthermore a plasmid with a gene coding for a histagged lacI Protein was transformed, which was kindly provided by Stefan Hoffmann.

  • Purification of his-tagged lacI
  • Test digest of transformed Biobricks: all clones as expected!
  • Plasmid isolation of BBa_R0010 and BBa_K592008

  • Verification of lacI-His
    • SDS-PAGE for analyzing the purifity of purified lacI-His
    • lacI-His was expected in the 38 kDa bands
    • Bands (size 38 kDa) were cut out and destained.

  • Identification of the bands cut before
    • Tryptic digestion of the proteins from the bands.
    • Measurement of the digested proteins via MALDI-TOF/TOF.
    • The measured peptide spectre was compared with spectre of other proteins with an E. coli database.
    • LacI identified (Mascot score: 765).

  • Development of the plasmid repressor interaction assay (PRIA)
    • After every step the reaction vessel were centrifuged with 1000 g for 1 minute. The DNA amount of the supernatant after centrifugation was analyzed via nanodrop.
    • As negative controls we did not add protein to the agarose in one sample and no plasmid in another sample.
    • We tested the interaction of lacI wit lac promoter and lac operator.
    • We also performed the assay at 0 °C and 37 °C
    • Steps:
      • 25 µL Ni-NTA agarose was put in a reaction vessel. Then centrifuge.
      • The agarose was washed three times with Kpi buffer.
      • 10 µg protein (we used lac Repressor with a His-Tag as model protein) in 20 µL Kpi buffer were added and incubated for 30 min. Then the agarose were centrifuged.
      • The agarose was incubated three times in Kpi Buffer (75 µL).
      • 1,5 µg plasmid (lacO) was mixed with 20 µL binding buffer and incubated for 15 minutes.
      • Unbound DNA was washed away three times.
      • 3x elution with binding buffer and analytes (for this experiment: IPTG)
      • Imidazol was used to release proteins from the agarose.
    • No results! DNA concentration could not be measured. Next time: analysis with gelelectrophoresis.

  • Plasmid isolation of E. coli KRX with pSB1C3-lacO
    • Concentration: 186,3 ng/µL
  • Suffix insertion: lacI-LVA as insert and pSB1C3-T7-RBS as backbone
  • Optimizing PRIA
    • The DNA amount of the supernatant after centrifugation was analyzed via gelelectrophoresis.
    • Repetition of the assay performed before
    • In the figure we could detect DNA after staining in ethidium bromide.
    • A high DNA amount was unbound.
    • Elution with IPTG possible. DNA could be detected after adding the analyte solution to the agarose.<
    • We did not see any difference between the temperatures.
    • Not adding protein to the agarose is a good negative control.
    • The rest of the agarose after the final step was dissolved in 10 µL water and also used for the analysis via gelelectrophorese.
  • Verification of protein amount in the supernatant of every step in the assay.
    • Detection via SDS-PAGE
    • No protein detected.

  • Testing analyte solution with different concentrations
    • We wanted to test 0.05 mM, 0.5 mM and 5 mM IPTG mixed with binding buffer as elution buffer.
    • No effect of the different IPTG concentration to the eluted DNA amount.
  • We standardized our assay. Every step took 15 minutes and the volume of the added solutions are 50 µL.
  • Restriction of pSB1A3, pSB1C3-lacI-LVA and pSB1C3-T7-RBS

  • Interaction study of lacI-lacO
    • We did an electrophoretic mass shift assay with lacO and lacI
    • #Probeauftragung+Bild?
    • It did not work. Next time: titration of the plasmid.

  • Repetition of EMSA for lacO-lacI interaction
  • Optimizing PRIA with different salt concentrations
    • Concentrations 100 mM, 250 mM and 500 mM KCl in binding buffer were tested in PRIA.
    • Using binding buffer with 500 mM KCl was best for PRIA.
    • 96 well plate as new system for PRIA
    • Unspecific binding of lacI.
    • No elution of lacO. DNA was unbound.

  • PRIA with different salt concentrations and creating a complex formation first before adding to the agarose
    • We tried to create the complex of lacO and lacI first and then bound it on the agarose.
    • We tested higher salt concentrations (0.5 M, 0.75 M, 1 M, 2 M KCl) in binding buffer. Moreover, we examined whether we could also utilize sodium chloride.
  • Cloning of pSB1C3_T7-RBS-lacI-His
    • Transformation of pSB1C3_T7-RBS-lacI-Histag in E. coli KRX was successful. Colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures.

  • Repetition of EMSA
  • Test to bind DNA in filter paper
    • The test was done to look whether DNA can be washed out.
    • 3 µL DNA was applied on a filter paper strip. Then the filter paper was stained with GelRed.
    • For the negative control, a filter paper strip without DNA was stained with GelRed.
    • No detection of DNA possible. Reason for no detection was that the intrinsic signal of the strip was too high.
  • We transformed BioBrick Bba_K1321340 from the distribution.
    • Transformation of Biobrick Bba_K1321340 in E. coli KRX
    • Colony PCR of 5 clones on the agarplate after transformation.
    • 5 colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
    • Plasmid isolation
    • Digestion with EcoRI and PstI for screening
  • We wanted to develop two new assays.
    • One assay is based on GFP labeled protein and immobilized DNA (with Cy3 and amino label) on filter paper. The other one is based on immobilized protein (contains a cellulose binding domain) and Cy3 labeled DNA.
  • Primer design for cloning CBD and sfGFP to the devices arsR, blcR and lacI.
  • These are the devices we wanted to clone:
    • pSB1C3-T7-RBS-lacI-sfGFP-His
    • pSB1C3-T7-RBS-arsR-sfGFP-His
    • pSB1C3-T7-RBS-lacI-sfGFP-His
    • pSB1C3-T7-RBS-arsR-CBD
    • pSB1C3-T7-RBS-blcR-CBD
    • pSB1C3-T7-RBS-blcR-CBD
    • Cy3- and amino-labeled lacO
    • Cy3- and amino-labeled arsR
    • Cy3- and amino-labeled blc promoter