Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Notebook/PlasmidDisplay"
Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
<div id="collapseSix" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | <div id="collapseSix" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | ||
<div class="panel-body"> | <div class="panel-body"> | ||
− | <p>...</p> | + | <p> |
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Development of the plasmid repressor interaction assay (PRIA)</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>After every step the reaction vessel were centrifuged with 1000 <i>g</i> for 1 minute. The DNA amount of the supernatant after centrifugation was analyzed via nanodrop. </li> | ||
+ | <li>As negative controls we did not add protein to the agarose in one sample and no plasmid in another sample.</li> | ||
+ | <li>We tested the interaction of lacI wit lac promoter and lac operator.</li> | ||
+ | <li>We also performed the assay at 0 °C and 37 °C</li> | ||
+ | <li>Steps: </li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>25 µL Ni-NTA agarose was put in a reaction vessel. Then centrifuge. </li> | ||
+ | <li>The agarose was washed three times with Kpi buffer. </li> | ||
+ | <li>10 µg protein (we used lac Repressor with a His-Tag as model protein) in 20 µL Kpi buffer were added and incubated for 30 min. Then the agarose were centrifuged. </li> | ||
+ | <li>The agarose was incubated three times in Kpi Buffer (75 µL).</li> | ||
+ | <li>1,5 µg plasmid (lacO) was mixed with 20 µL binding buffer and incubated for 15 minutes. </li> | ||
+ | <li>Unbound DNA was washed away three times. </li> | ||
+ | <li>3x elution with binding buffer and analytes (for this experiment: IPTG)</li> | ||
+ | <li>Imidazol was used to release proteins from the agarose. </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <li>No results! DNA concentration could not be measured. Next time: analysis with gelelectrophoresis.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 167: | Line 189: | ||
<div id="collapseSeven" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | <div id="collapseSeven" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | ||
<div class="panel-body"> | <div class="panel-body"> | ||
− | <p>...</p> | + | <p> |
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Plasmid isolation of <i>E. coli</i> KRX with pSB1C3-lacO </li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Concentration: 186,3 ng/µL</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <li>Suffix insertion: lacI-LVA as insert and pSB1C3-T7-RBS as backbone</li> | ||
+ | <li>Optimizing PRIA</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li> The DNA amount of the supernatant after centrifugation was analyzed via gelelectrophoresis.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Repetition of the assay performed before</li> | ||
+ | <li>In the figure we could detect DNA after staining in ethidium bromide. </li> | ||
+ | <li>A high DNA amount was unbound.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Elution with IPTG possible. DNA could be detected after adding the analyte solution to the agarose.<</li> | ||
+ | <li>We did not see any difference between the temperatures.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Not adding protein to the agarose is a good negative control.</li> | ||
+ | <li>The rest of the agarose after the final step was dissolved in 10 µL water and also used for the analysis via gelelectrophorese.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <li>Verification of protein amount in the supernatant of every step in the assay.</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Detection via SDS-PAGE</li> | ||
+ | <li>No protein detected.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 179: | Line 225: | ||
<div id="collapseEight" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | <div id="collapseEight" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | ||
<div class="panel-body"> | <div class="panel-body"> | ||
− | <p>...</p> | + | <p> |
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Testing analyte solution with different concentrations</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>We wanted to test 0.05 mM, 0.5 mM and 5 mM IPTG mixed with binding buffer as elution buffer. </li> | ||
+ | <li>No effect of the different IPTG concentration to the eluted DNA amount. </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <li>We standardized our assay. Every step took 15 minutes and the volume of the added solutions are 50 µL.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Restriction of pSB1A3, pSB1C3-lacI-LVA and pSB1C3-T7-RBS</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 191: | Line 247: | ||
<div id="collapseNine" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | <div id="collapseNine" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | ||
<div class="panel-body"> | <div class="panel-body"> | ||
− | <p>.. | + | <p> |
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Interaction study of lacI-lacO</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>We did an electrophoretic mass shift assay with lacO and lacI</li> | ||
+ | #Probeauftragung+Bild? | ||
+ | <li>It did not work. Next time: titration of the plasmid. </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 203: | Line 269: | ||
<div id="collapseTen" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | <div id="collapseTen" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | ||
<div class="panel-body"> | <div class="panel-body"> | ||
− | <p>...</p> | + | <p> |
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Repetition of EMSA for lacO-lacI interaction </li> | ||
+ | <li>Optimizing PRIA with different salt concentrations</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Concentrations 100 mM, 250 mM and 500 mM KCl in binding buffer were tested in PRIA.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Using binding buffer with 500 mM KCl was best for PRIA. </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>96 well plate as new system for PRIA</li> | ||
+ | <li>Unspecific binding of lacI.</li> | ||
+ | <li>No elution of lacO. DNA was unbound. </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <li></li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 215: | Line 297: | ||
<div id="collapseEleven" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | <div id="collapseEleven" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | ||
<div class="panel-body"> | <div class="panel-body"> | ||
− | <p>...</p> | + | <p> |
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>PRIA with different salt concentrations and creating a complex formation first before adding to the agarose</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>We tried to create the complex of lacO and lacI first and then bound it on the agarose. </li> | ||
+ | <li>We tested higher salt concentrations (0.5 M, 0.75 M, 1 M, 2 M KCl) in binding buffer. Moreover, we examined whether we could also utilize sodium chloride. </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <li>Cloning of pSB1C3_T7-RBS-lacI-His</li> | ||
+ | <ul><li>Transformation of pSB1C3_T7-RBS-lacI-Histag in E. coli KRX was successful. | ||
+ | Colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures. </li></ul> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 228: | Line 321: | ||
<div id="collapseTwelve" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | <div id="collapseTwelve" class="panel-collapse collapse"> | ||
<div class="panel-body"> | <div class="panel-body"> | ||
− | <p>...</p> | + | <p> |
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Repetition of EMSA</li> | ||
+ | <li>Test to bind DNA in filter paper</li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>The test was done to look whether DNA can be washed out. </li> | ||
+ | <li>3 µL DNA was applied on a filter paper strip. Then the filter paper was stained with GelRed. </li> | ||
+ | <li>For the negative control, a filter paper strip without DNA was stained with GelRed. </li> | ||
+ | <li>No detection of DNA possible. Reason for no detection was that the intrinsic signal of the strip was too high. </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <li>We transformed BioBrick Bba_K1321340 from the distribution. | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Transformation of Biobrick Bba_K1321340 in <i>E. coli</i> KRX</li> | ||
+ | <li>Colony PCR of 5 clones on the agarplate after transformation. </li> | ||
+ | <li>5 colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures. </li> | ||
+ | <li>Plasmid isolation</li> | ||
+ | <li>Digestion with EcoRI and PstI for screening</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <li>We wanted to develop two new assays. </li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>One assay is based on GFP labeled protein and immobilized DNA (with Cy3 and amino label) on filter paper. The other one is based on immobilized protein (contains a cellulose binding domain) and Cy3 labeled DNA. | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <li>Primer design for cloning CBD and sfGFP to the devices arsR, blcR and lacI.</li> | ||
+ | <li>These are the devices we wanted to clone: </li> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-lacI-sfGFP-His</li> | ||
+ | <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-arsR-sfGFP-His</li> | ||
+ | <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-lacI-sfGFP-His</li> | ||
+ | <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-arsR-CBD</li> | ||
+ | <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-blcR-CBD</li> | ||
+ | <li>pSB1C3-T7-RBS-blcR-CBD</li> | ||
+ | <li>Cy3- and amino-labeled lacO</li> | ||
+ | <li>Cy3- and amino-labeled arsR</li> | ||
+ | <li>Cy3- and amino-labeled blc promoter</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 21:40, 20 August 2015
- Heat shock transformation of Biobricks needed for further assays was performed. Glycerol stocks were generated and the plasmids isolated according to the kits manual. The relevant Biobricks were:
- BBa_K525998: T7 promotor and RBS
- BBa_C0012: lacI repressor with LVA Tag
- BBa_R0010: lac Promotor
- BBa_K592008: lac Operator
- Furthermore a plasmid with a gene coding for a histagged lacI Protein was transformed, which was kindly provided by Stefan Hoffmann.
- Purification of his-tagged lacI
- Test digest of transformed Biobricks: all clones as expected!
- Plasmid isolation of BBa_R0010 and BBa_K592008
- Verification of lacI-His
- SDS-PAGE for analyzing the purifity of purified lacI-His
- lacI-His was expected in the 38 kDa bands
- Bands (size 38 kDa) were cut out and destained.
- Identification of the bands cut before
- Tryptic digestion of the proteins from the bands.
- Measurement of the digested proteins via MALDI-TOF/TOF.
- The measured peptide spectre was compared with spectre of other proteins with an E. coli database.
- LacI identified (Mascot score: 765).
- Development of the plasmid repressor interaction assay (PRIA)
- After every step the reaction vessel were centrifuged with 1000 g for 1 minute. The DNA amount of the supernatant after centrifugation was analyzed via nanodrop.
- As negative controls we did not add protein to the agarose in one sample and no plasmid in another sample.
- We tested the interaction of lacI wit lac promoter and lac operator.
- We also performed the assay at 0 °C and 37 °C
- Steps:
- 25 µL Ni-NTA agarose was put in a reaction vessel. Then centrifuge.
- The agarose was washed three times with Kpi buffer.
- 10 µg protein (we used lac Repressor with a His-Tag as model protein) in 20 µL Kpi buffer were added and incubated for 30 min. Then the agarose were centrifuged.
- The agarose was incubated three times in Kpi Buffer (75 µL).
- 1,5 µg plasmid (lacO) was mixed with 20 µL binding buffer and incubated for 15 minutes.
- Unbound DNA was washed away three times.
- 3x elution with binding buffer and analytes (for this experiment: IPTG)
- Imidazol was used to release proteins from the agarose.
- No results! DNA concentration could not be measured. Next time: analysis with gelelectrophoresis.
- Plasmid isolation of E. coli KRX with pSB1C3-lacO
- Concentration: 186,3 ng/µL
- Suffix insertion: lacI-LVA as insert and pSB1C3-T7-RBS as backbone
- Optimizing PRIA
- The DNA amount of the supernatant after centrifugation was analyzed via gelelectrophoresis.
- Repetition of the assay performed before
- In the figure we could detect DNA after staining in ethidium bromide.
- A high DNA amount was unbound.
- Elution with IPTG possible. DNA could be detected after adding the analyte solution to the agarose.<
- We did not see any difference between the temperatures.
- Not adding protein to the agarose is a good negative control.
- The rest of the agarose after the final step was dissolved in 10 µL water and also used for the analysis via gelelectrophorese.
- Verification of protein amount in the supernatant of every step in the assay.
- Detection via SDS-PAGE
- No protein detected.
- Testing analyte solution with different concentrations
- We wanted to test 0.05 mM, 0.5 mM and 5 mM IPTG mixed with binding buffer as elution buffer.
- No effect of the different IPTG concentration to the eluted DNA amount.
- We standardized our assay. Every step took 15 minutes and the volume of the added solutions are 50 µL.
- Restriction of pSB1A3, pSB1C3-lacI-LVA and pSB1C3-T7-RBS
- Interaction study of lacI-lacO
- We did an electrophoretic mass shift assay with lacO and lacI #Probeauftragung+Bild?
- It did not work. Next time: titration of the plasmid.
- Repetition of EMSA for lacO-lacI interaction
- Optimizing PRIA with different salt concentrations
- Concentrations 100 mM, 250 mM and 500 mM KCl in binding buffer were tested in PRIA.
- Using binding buffer with 500 mM KCl was best for PRIA.
- 96 well plate as new system for PRIA
- Unspecific binding of lacI.
- No elution of lacO. DNA was unbound.
- PRIA with different salt concentrations and creating a complex formation first before adding to the agarose
- We tried to create the complex of lacO and lacI first and then bound it on the agarose.
- We tested higher salt concentrations (0.5 M, 0.75 M, 1 M, 2 M KCl) in binding buffer. Moreover, we examined whether we could also utilize sodium chloride.
- Cloning of pSB1C3_T7-RBS-lacI-His
- Transformation of pSB1C3_T7-RBS-lacI-Histag in E. coli KRX was successful. Colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
- Repetition of EMSA
- Test to bind DNA in filter paper
- The test was done to look whether DNA can be washed out.
- 3 µL DNA was applied on a filter paper strip. Then the filter paper was stained with GelRed.
- For the negative control, a filter paper strip without DNA was stained with GelRed.
- No detection of DNA possible. Reason for no detection was that the intrinsic signal of the strip was too high.
- We transformed BioBrick Bba_K1321340 from the distribution.
- Transformation of Biobrick Bba_K1321340 in E. coli KRX
- Colony PCR of 5 clones on the agarplate after transformation.
- 5 colonies were used to inoculate overnight cultures.
- Plasmid isolation
- Digestion with EcoRI and PstI for screening
- We wanted to develop two new assays.
- One assay is based on GFP labeled protein and immobilized DNA (with Cy3 and amino label) on filter paper. The other one is based on immobilized protein (contains a cellulose binding domain) and Cy3 labeled DNA.
- Primer design for cloning CBD and sfGFP to the devices arsR, blcR and lacI.
- These are the devices we wanted to clone:
- pSB1C3-T7-RBS-lacI-sfGFP-His
- pSB1C3-T7-RBS-arsR-sfGFP-His
- pSB1C3-T7-RBS-lacI-sfGFP-His
- pSB1C3-T7-RBS-arsR-CBD
- pSB1C3-T7-RBS-blcR-CBD
- pSB1C3-T7-RBS-blcR-CBD
- Cy3- and amino-labeled lacO
- Cy3- and amino-labeled arsR
- Cy3- and amino-labeled blc promoter