Difference between revisions of "Team:Tokyo Tech/Project/Modeling2"
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
<p class="text">Prisoner A and B have the different growth rate because prisoner A and B produce the different protein. <br>The difference of the growth rate causes the problem that the replicated payoff matrix is asymmetric. The graph shown in Fig.4-2-1-1. | <p class="text">Prisoner A and B have the different growth rate because prisoner A and B produce the different protein. <br>The difference of the growth rate causes the problem that the replicated payoff matrix is asymmetric. The graph shown in Fig.4-2-1-1. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| − | <table width="940px">><tbody><tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/33/Tokyo_Tech_modeling2_4.png"></td></tr><tr><td><h4 align="center" class="fig">Fig.4-2-1-1. </h4></td></tr></tbody></table> | + | <table width="940px" align="center">><tbody><tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/33/Tokyo_Tech_modeling2_4.png"></td></tr><tr><td><h4 align="center" class="fig">Fig.4-2-1-1. </h4></td></tr></tbody></table> |
<p class="text">We tried to solve this problem in this way of experimenting the different concentration of Chloramphenicol in prisoner A and B. We calculated this optimized concentration of prisoner A and B by modeling.</p> | <p class="text">We tried to solve this problem in this way of experimenting the different concentration of Chloramphenicol in prisoner A and B. We calculated this optimized concentration of prisoner A and B by modeling.</p> | ||
<p></p> | <p></p> | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
<p class="text"> | <p class="text"> | ||
We showed the graph of optical density after 8 hours to Fig.4-2-3-1.</p> | We showed the graph of optical density after 8 hours to Fig.4-2-3-1.</p> | ||
| − | <table width="940px"><tbody><tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/66/Tokyo_Tech_modeling2_5.png"></td></tr><tr><td><h4 align="center" class="fig">Fig.4-2-3-1. </h4></td></tr></tbody></table> | + | <table align="center" width="940px"><tbody><tr><td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/6/66/Tokyo_Tech_modeling2_5.png"></td></tr><tr><td><h4 align="center" class="fig">Fig.4-2-3-1. </h4></td></tr></tbody></table> |
<h2 id="Reference" class="smalltitle">6. Reference</h2> | <h2 id="Reference" class="smalltitle">6. Reference</h2> | ||
Revision as of 08:32, 14 September 2015
Calculation of the concentration of Chloramphenicol(未定)
1. Introduction
Prisoner A and B have the different growth rate because prisoner A and B produce the different protein.
The difference of the growth rate causes the problem that the replicated payoff matrix is asymmetric. The graph shown in Fig.4-2-1-1.
 |
Fig.4-2-1-1. |
We tried to solve this problem in this way of experimenting the different concentration of Chloramphenicol in prisoner A and B. We calculated this optimized concentration of prisoner A and B by modeling.
2. Equations
We constructed the following model for this modeling.
The equations for production of CmR from AHL are the following (1), (2)
Then, the equation for the leakage of CmR is the following (3).
The equations for optical density of prisoner A and B in four damages are the following (4) ～ (11).
We determined the concentration of Chloramphenicol for prisoner A as the error of optical density of prisoner A and B in 4 damages after 8 hours fallen in±10% in this case the concentration of Chloramphenicol for prisoner B is 75µg/mL.
3. Result
We showed the graph of optical density after 8 hours to Fig.4-2-3-1.
 |
Fig.4-2-3-1. |
6. Reference
ここにコピペ。