Difference between revisions of "Team:Tokyo Tech/Practices"
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
<h2 id="Introduction" class="smalltitle">0. Medal Criteria</h2> | <h2 id="Introduction" class="smalltitle">0. Medal Criteria</h2> | ||
<p class="text">メダル要件と考えているうんだらかんだら。</p> | <p class="text">メダル要件と考えているうんだらかんだら。</p> | ||
| − | <h3 id="Design" class="sub5">0.1. Design and execution of prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public <br> | + | <h3 id="Design" class="sub5">0.1. Design and execution of prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public <br> to investigate public concerns to GMO.</h3> |
| − | + | <h3 id="Reflecting" class="sub5">0.2. Reflecting on our own conception of risks and benefits led to addressing <br> social justice.</h3> | |
| − | <h3 id="Reflecting" class="sub5">0.2. Reflecting on our own conception of risks and benefits led to addressing social justice.</h3> | + | |
<h3 id="Design" class="sub5">0.3. Our attractive project improved in accordance with comments from general public, <br> can strengthen the public engagement of a two-way dialogue between our team and the public</h3> | <h3 id="Design" class="sub5">0.3. Our attractive project improved in accordance with comments from general public, <br> can strengthen the public engagement of a two-way dialogue between our team and the public</h3> | ||
<p class="text2">メダル要件と考えているうんだらかんだら。</p><br> | <p class="text2">メダル要件と考えているうんだらかんだら。</p><br> | ||
Revision as of 08:59, 14 September 2015
Policy&Practices
contents
0. Medal Criteria
0.1. Design and execution of prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public
to investigate public concerns to GMO.
0.2. Reflecting on our own conception of risks and benefits led to addressing social justice.
0.3. Our attractive project improved in accordance with comments from general public,
can strengthen the public engagement of a two-way dialogue between our team and the public
1. Introduction
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Materials and Methods
5.1. Construction
5.2. Assay Protocol
5.2.1. Protocol1
5.2.2. Protocol2
6. Reference
0. Medal Criteria
メダル要件と考えているうんだらかんだら。
0.1. Design and execution of prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public
to investigate public concerns to GMO.
0.2. Reflecting on our own conception of risks and benefits led to addressing
social justice.
0.3. Our attractive project improved in accordance with comments from general public,
can strengthen the public engagement of a two-way dialogue between our team and the public
メダル要件と考えているうんだらかんだら。
2. Summary of the Experiment
ここにコピペ。
3. Results
ここにコピペ。
4. Discussion
ここにコピペ。
5. Materials and Methods
5.1. Construction
-Strain
All the samples were DH5alpha strain.
-Plasmids
Device 1: J23101 + I13504(pSB1C3)
|
|
Fig.3-7-4-1. |
5.2. Assay Protocol
5.2.1. Protocol1
1. コピペ。
2. コピペ。
3. コピペ。
4. コピペ。
5. コピペ。
6. コピペ。
7. コピペ。
8. コピペ。
9. コピペ。
6.. Reference
ここにコピペ。