Difference between revisions of "Team:Tokyo Tech/Practices"

Line 49: Line 49:
 
　　　　　　<p class="textred">We think that the following 3 processes of P&P meets both of the silver and gold medal criteria.</p>
 
　　　　　　<p class="textred">We think that the following 3 processes of P&P meets both of the silver and gold medal criteria.</p>
 
               <h3 id="Design" class="sub5">0.1. Design and execution of prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;to investigate public concerns to GMO.</h3>
 
               <h3 id="Design" class="sub5">0.1. Design and execution of prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;to investigate public concerns to GMO.</h3>
 +
<table width="980 px" border="0px">
 +
                  <tr>
 +
                  <td width="980px">
 +
                  <p class="text3">By receiving opinions from public, we integrated, into our project, a prisoner’s dilemma game played by the high school and undergraduate students, who are people outside of iGEM, to investigate the stereotype of concerns about gene modification. Since we received opinions from the public who concerned the sustainability, safety, and security of gene modification, we designed and executed the prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public. </p>
 +
                  </td>
 +
                  </tr>
 +
      <tr>
 +
      <td width="980px">
 +
      <h4 align="center" class="fig"><strong>Fig.3-7-4-1.</strong></h4>
 +
      <td>
 +
      </tr>
 +
      </table>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 
　　　　　　<p class="text3">By receiving opinions from public, we integrated, into our project, a prisoner’s dilemma game played by the high school and undergraduate students, who are people outside of iGEM, to investigate the stereotype of concerns about gene modification. Since we received opinions from the public who concerned the sustainability, safety, and security of gene modification, we designed and executed the prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public. </p><br>
 
　　　　　　<p class="text3">By receiving opinions from public, we integrated, into our project, a prisoner’s dilemma game played by the high school and undergraduate students, who are people outside of iGEM, to investigate the stereotype of concerns about gene modification. Since we received opinions from the public who concerned the sustainability, safety, and security of gene modification, we designed and executed the prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public. </p><br>
 
               <h3 id="Reflecting" class="sub5">0.2. Reflecting on our own conception of risks and benefits led to addressing <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;social justice.</h3>
 
               <h3 id="Reflecting" class="sub5">0.2. Reflecting on our own conception of risks and benefits led to addressing <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;social justice.</h3>

Revision as of 10:10, 14 September 2015

Policy&Practices

　　

contents

0. Medal Criteria

0.1. Design and execution of prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public
       to investigate public concerns to GMO.

0.2. Reflecting on our own conception of risks and benefits led to addressing social justice.

0.3. Our attractive project improved in accordance with comments from general public,
        can strengthen the public engagement of a two-way dialogue between our team and the public

1. Introduction

3. Results

4. Discussion

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Construction

5.2. Assay Protocol

5.2.1. Protocol1

5.2.2. Protocol2

6. Reference


　　

0. Medal Criteria

　　　　　　

We think that the following 3 processes of P&P meets both of the silver and gold medal criteria.

0.1. Design and execution of prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public
       to investigate public concerns to GMO.

By receiving opinions from public, we integrated, into our project, a prisoner’s dilemma game played by the high school and undergraduate students, who are people outside of iGEM, to investigate the stereotype of concerns about gene modification. Since we received opinions from the public who concerned the sustainability, safety, and security of gene modification, we designed and executed the prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public.

Fig.3-7-4-1.
　　　　　　

By receiving opinions from public, we integrated, into our project, a prisoner’s dilemma game played by the high school and undergraduate students, who are people outside of iGEM, to investigate the stereotype of concerns about gene modification. Since we received opinions from the public who concerned the sustainability, safety, and security of gene modification, we designed and executed the prisoner’s dilemma game played by the public.


0.2. Reflecting on our own conception of risks and benefits led to addressing
       social justice.

　　　　　　

メダル要件と考えているうんだらかんだら。


0.3. Our attractive project improved in accordance with comments from general public,
       can strengthen the public engagement of a two-way dialogue between our team and
       the public

　　　　　　

メダル要件と考えているうんだらかんだら。


1. Introduction

　　　　　　

ここにコピペ。

3. Results

　　　　　　

ここにコピペ。

4. Discussion

　　　　　　

ここにコピペ。

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Construction

-Strain

　　　　　　

All the samples were DH5alpha strain.

-Plasmids

　　　　　　

Device 1: J23101 + I13504(pSB1C3)

Fig.3-7-4-1.

5.2. Assay Protocol

5.2.1. Protocol1

1. コピペ。
2. コピペ。
3. コピペ。
4. コピペ。
5. コピペ。
6. コピペ。
7. コピペ。
8. コピペ。
9. コピペ。

6.. Reference

　　　　　　

ここにコピペ。