Difference between revisions of "Team:Marburg/Measurement"
| Line 395: | Line 395: | ||
<figure style="text-align:center;"> | <figure style="text-align:center;"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a3/MR_pic_PILS4-6.png" width="400px" alt="ILS_platereader" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/a/a3/MR_pic_PILS4-6.png" width="400px" alt="ILS_platereader" /> | ||
| − | <figcaption style="margin-top:5px;font-size:11pt;color:#606060;text-align:centered;line-height:110%"><b>Figure | + | <figcaption style="margin-top:5px;font-size:11pt;color:#606060;text-align:centered;line-height:110%"><b>Figure 1:</b> Structure of InterLab Study Constructs that were further characterized in our Measurement Study</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure style="text-align:center;"> | <figure style="text-align:center;"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e5/MR_pic_ILS_Constr4%2B5.png" width="400px" alt="ILS_platereader" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/e/e5/MR_pic_ILS_Constr4%2B5.png" width="400px" alt="ILS_platereader" /> | ||
| − | <figcaption style="margin-top:5px;font-size:11pt;color:#606060;text-align:centered;line-height:110%"><b>Figure | + | <figcaption style="margin-top:5px;font-size:11pt;color:#606060;text-align:centered;line-height:110%"><b>Figure 2:</b> Structure of extended InterLab Study constructs - replacement of coding sequence to test its influence on expression</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<figure style="text-align:center;"> | <figure style="text-align:center;"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/54/MR_pic_ILS_Constr6%2B7.png" width="400px" alt="ILS_platereader" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/54/MR_pic_ILS_Constr6%2B7.png" width="400px" alt="ILS_platereader" /> | ||
| − | <figcaption style="margin-top:5px;font-size:11pt;color:#606060;text-align:centered;line-height:110%"><b>Figure | + | <figcaption style="margin-top:5px;font-size:11pt;color:#606060;text-align:centered;line-height:110%"><b>Figure 3:</b> Structure of double promoter and double fluorescence constructs to normalize over fluorescence and measure noise.</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 22:56, 17 September 2015
Aim
After working on the InterLab Study we asked ourselves, how much characterization is needed to fully describe a part or construct. With the InterLab Study, iGEM invited all the competing teams around the world to measure fluorescence from the same three genetic devices for GFP expression. The aim of the InterLab Study is to investigate the reproducibility of BioBrick characterization by collecting data of the same experiment from iGEM Teams around the world. Since standardization is an important aspect for synthetic biology, we wanted to show a way to make an overall and deep characterization of devices. For that we extended our InterLab Study project to a Measurement Study and characterized the promoters with diverse methods, in different constructs and chassis. Our goal is to create the best-characterized parts in the registry of biological parts. To achieve this goal, we used the plate reader, flow cytometry, proteomics and microscopy experiments to measure the fluorescence in single cells and in population. We introduced the devices into different strains, DH5alpha and the wild type MG1655. We also expressed RFP instead of GFP and normalized our data not only over the OD but also over the expressed RFP. We additionally showed the impact of evolution that can be seen in protein expression over time and quantified the noise of the gene expression. With this we contributed to a roadmap for characterization to the BioBrick registry and brought part characterization to the next level.
Project Design
We extended the Interlab Study constructs in order to be able to better characterize the promoter, and the expression on both single and population level. In order to see if the coding sequence of a gene has an influence on the expression level, we build a construct, where the GFP is replaced by an RFP. Additionally we wanted to normalize not only over the OD, but also over an internal standard. Therefore we placed a second gene with a strong promoter behind our GFP InterLab constructs and normalized over the other fluorescence. This double promoter-fluorescence gene construct was also used to measure the noise of our expression system. As not only the constructs themselves can lead to different expression levels but also the chassis, we used two common lab strains, Dh5alpha and MG1655 in order test our constructs. The expression levels were measured with a variety of different techniques and will allow a more comprehensive characterization and description of our constructs.
Results
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua.
Outlook
In our follow up studies, we want to establish a standardization pipeline from construction till the provision of a data sheet. The registry of biological parts is the biggest collection of its kind, but many researchers that we have spoken to, hesitate using it. The reason for that is the lack of characterization and therefore a lack of quality. All iGEM Teams have to face this challenge and see it as a contribution to the field and the community of synthetic biology to provide a good characterization of their parts and construct. However, there is a strong need for standardization and characterization facilities in synthetic biology. As teams submit the BioBricks around the world, there should be a synthetic biology standardization facility in each continent, so that the standardization effort becomes an international call in synthetic biology. We as the iGEM Team Marburg will continue our work on part characterization. We want to extend our efforts further, for example on the RNA level, to have indications on all levels of protein biosynthesis about the expression of the fluorescent proteins. Much more work is needed to aim our goal of perfect characterization of standard biological parts.
Background
In synthetic biology, it is important that part characterization is consistent between different labs to be able to create well-defined standard parts whose behavior is predictable. One of the fundamental principles in Synthetic Biology is engineering. But different from electrical or mechanical engineering, Biology engineering makes use of life itself. Our biological constructs are self-replicating and there is an interaction between our circuits and the chassis that we choose to express them in. Also most biological Parts are not as well defined and characterized as in other engineering disciplines. Because of that, one of the most challenging parts in the transition from science to an engineering field is to define standards. Every engineering discipline is very fond of standardization. In the classical mechanical engineering, standards are used to provide sufficient information about a part and the defined standards lead to an abstraction of an element’s behavior and the simplification of the design. Hence parts can be treated as a black box, which can easily be combined with others. The most common example for standardization in synthetic biology is the BioBrick standard generated by the iGEM competition. Another example is the recently introduced Standard European Vector Architecture. But as we can already see with this example, there is no uniform concept of DNA part standards. Besides the introduction of a common standard also the characterization of parts should be standardized. Both the BioBricks and the Standard European Vector Architecture are only construction standards. Developing a characterization standard is even harder to reach, as Biology is a complex science and each part and construct behaves differently in the different chassis. It is hence hard to define characterization procedures and protocols and to be able to compare them. One way of approaching the characterization is to test the different behaviors of a construct. In our measurement project we tried to follow a holistic approach in order characterize a part as complete as possible and to introduce a new standards of how to characterize parts.
Lessons Learned from Measurement Study
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua.
