Difference between revisions of "Team:UC Davis/Safety"

Line 135: Line 135:
  
  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4b/SPSafetyBannerUCD.png" width="981px" height="84"></a><br><br>                          <!--CHANGE OUT BANNER HERE-->
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/4/4b/SPSafetyBannerUCD.png" width="981px" height="84"></a><br><br>
  
 
          
 
          
Line 148: Line 148:
  
  
STUFF BEFORE READ MORE
+
<b>In the Laboratory</b>
 
+
Inside the lab the risks our project posed were the handling of the various small molecule substrates. The actions we took to reduce those risks were to work with those substrates in the fume hood, wearing eye protection, and wearing rubber gloves. One of the potential substrates, crotonaldehyde, was extremely toxic, and so the most logical action to reduce our risk from using that molecule was to simply not use it.
 
+
 
+
 
+
<span class="read-more-target">
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
STUFF AFTER READ MORE
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
</span></p>
+
 
+
  <label for="post-1" class="read-more-trigger"></label>
+
</div>
+
  
  
Line 192: Line 175:
  
  
 
STUFF BEFORE READ MORE
 
 
 
 
 
<span class="read-more-target">
 
 
 
 
 
STUFF AFTER READ MORE
 
 
 
 
 
</span></p>
 
 
 
  <label for="post-1" class="read-more-trigger"></label>
 
</div>
 
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 228: Line 191:
  
  
 
+
<b>In the Real World</b>
 
+
The risk our project might pose in the real world is the handling of hazardous substrates. We've discovered non natural substrates to use on our enzyme sensor, but the molecules we've found are somewhat hazardous. As a product, if all of the reagents would need to be self contained and never in direct contact with the user. To reduce such risk, we might want to screen for other less hazardous substrates.
 
+
  
  

Revision as of 23:29, 17 September 2015



In the Laboratory Inside the lab the risks our project posed were the handling of the various small molecule substrates. The actions we took to reduce those risks were to work with those substrates in the fume hood, wearing eye protection, and wearing rubber gloves. One of the potential substrates, crotonaldehyde, was extremely toxic, and so the most logical action to reduce our risk from using that molecule was to simply not use it.

  1. First bullet point
  2. Second bullent point


Sources:



        ↥ In the Real World The risk our project might pose in the real world is the handling of hazardous substrates. We've discovered non natural substrates to use on our enzyme sensor, but the molecules we've found are somewhat hazardous. As a product, if all of the reagents would need to be self contained and never in direct contact with the user. To reduce such risk, we might want to screen for other less hazardous substrates.


  1. First bullet point
  2. Second bullent point


Continue scrolling to read more or click here to advance to the next section!

Sources:


        ↥
  1. First bullet point
  2. Second bullent point


Continue scrolling to read more or click here to advance to the next section!

Sources:
        ↥
  1. First bullet point
  2. Second bullent point


Continue scrolling to read more or click here to advance to the next section!

Sources:
        ↥
  1. First bullet point
  2. Second bullent point


Sources:
        ↥