Difference between revisions of "Team:Macquarie Australia/Practices/Implementation/RiskAnalysis"

Line 42: Line 42:
 
<figure class="specialInline"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3d/MqAus_risk_analysis_banner.jpg" width="500px"></figure>
 
<figure class="specialInline"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/3/3d/MqAus_risk_analysis_banner.jpg" width="500px"></figure>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
 +
 +
 +
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Risk evaluation</h2>
 +
 +
<h5 style="text-align: center;">Identifying and managing risks </h5>
 +
<p>As with all commercial ventures it is imperative to understand the potential underlying risks that would impinge on the overall success of the business so that they can be effectively managed and potentially mitigated entirely. Typically risk falls under a few specific categories; financial, legal, market, technical and systematic. Ultimately the appraisal of risk forms the basis for venture capital and private equity funding where investors seek opportunities to diversify their portfolios based on their unique risk profile.</p>
 +
 +
<h5 style="text-align: center;">Financial Risks</h5>
 +
<p>One of the greatest challenges for any potential business is raising sufficient capital necessary for a business to gain the momentum that ultimately yields income. A fundamental aspect of this process involves ascertaining costs associated with production, labor and ultimately optimisation. What makes our case challenging is that unlike conventional ventures, optimisation of production through adequate research and development is the foremost sunk cost. After the reward of this sunk cost is realised labor costs will be significantly minimized, the principal financial risk herein is realising a return for this initial outlay.</p>
 +
 +
<h5 style="text-align: center;">Legal Risks</h5>
 +
<p>As explored in <a href=”https://2015.igem.org/Team:Macquarie_Australia/Practices/ImpCompetitive”>competitive advantage</a> based on our conversations with two independant patent lawyers we have a fair case for IP provided that our product is novel (which to the best of our ability it is) but is also innovative solving a problem in a unique way. A key risk could be the failure to crystalise adequate intellectual protection in time to reap the rewards of exclusive rights under the presence of aggressive competitors.</p>
 +
 +
<h5 style="text-align: center;">Market Risks</h5>
 +
<p>Within the timeframes involved in bringing our product to market it is important to consider both the variability of global energy prices and sustained decline of renewable energy costs.  At the time of writing brent oil prices are quite low making direct competition with fossil fuels challenging, while falling costs of photovoltaic cells pose even stronger competition.</p>
 +
 +
<div class="centreStuffInline">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/d/d5/Image_1_swot_risk_analysis_gm.jpg">
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
  
 
</div> <!-- contentContainer end -->
 
</div> <!-- contentContainer end -->
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 12:40, 18 September 2015

Sitemap
Link to Practices page
Link to Chlorophyll Mythbusters page
Implementation Strategy page
Link to Internship page
Link to So You Think You Can Synthesise page
Link to Macquarie University Open Day page
Link to Collaborations page
Link to Overview/main
Link to Competitive Advantage page
Link to Competitive Advantage page
Link to Key Opinion Leaders page
Link to Prototype Design page
Link to Prototype Design page
Link to Prototype Design page


Risk evaluation

Identifying and managing risks

As with all commercial ventures it is imperative to understand the potential underlying risks that would impinge on the overall success of the business so that they can be effectively managed and potentially mitigated entirely. Typically risk falls under a few specific categories; financial, legal, market, technical and systematic. Ultimately the appraisal of risk forms the basis for venture capital and private equity funding where investors seek opportunities to diversify their portfolios based on their unique risk profile.

Financial Risks

One of the greatest challenges for any potential business is raising sufficient capital necessary for a business to gain the momentum that ultimately yields income. A fundamental aspect of this process involves ascertaining costs associated with production, labor and ultimately optimisation. What makes our case challenging is that unlike conventional ventures, optimisation of production through adequate research and development is the foremost sunk cost. After the reward of this sunk cost is realised labor costs will be significantly minimized, the principal financial risk herein is realising a return for this initial outlay.

Legal Risks

As explored in competitive advantage based on our conversations with two independant patent lawyers we have a fair case for IP provided that our product is novel (which to the best of our ability it is) but is also innovative solving a problem in a unique way. A key risk could be the failure to crystalise adequate intellectual protection in time to reap the rewards of exclusive rights under the presence of aggressive competitors.

Market Risks

Within the timeframes involved in bringing our product to market it is important to consider both the variability of global energy prices and sustained decline of renewable energy costs. At the time of writing brent oil prices are quite low making direct competition with fossil fuels challenging, while falling costs of photovoltaic cells pose even stronger competition.