Difference between revisions of "Team:Waterloo/Modeling/PAM Flexibility"

m (Correct caption)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
     <h2>Computational Engineering of PAM Flexibility</h2>
 
     <h2>Computational Engineering of PAM Flexibility</h2>
 
     <h3>Modelling Binding with PyMOL and PyRosetta</h3>
 
     <h3>Modelling Binding with PyMOL and PyRosetta</h3>
<p> As of June 2015, at least three different groups have produce experimental data on Cas9 structure. By using a catalytically dead version of spCas9 (dCas9), Anders et al. managed to determine the crystal structure of a Cas9 protein bound to both the sgRNA and the double stranded target DNA<cite ref="Anders2014"></cite>. The PDB file containing this structure can be found in the Protein Data Bank with ID 4UN3.
+
<p> As of June 2015, at least three different groups have produce experimental data on Cas9 structure. By using a catalytically dead version of spCas9 (dCas9), Anders et al. managed to determine the crystal structure of a Cas9 protein bound to both the sgRNA and the double stranded target DNA<cite ref="Anders2014"></cite>. The PDB file containing this structure can be found in the Protein Data Bank with ID 4UN3.</p>
 +
 
 
     <p>Canonical molecular dynamics data, mention source of PDB</p>
 
     <p>Canonical molecular dynamics data, mention source of PDB</p>
     <p>Mutating PAM sites within PDB</p>
+
   
   
+
     <p>Our approach for further structural mutations in the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) region for Cas9 recognition was applied by generating a combination of 64 different PAM sequences using both 3DNA and Chimera (our choice of software will be elaborated below); these combinations were implemented by altering the original 4UN3 PDB file and were subsequently tested and scored using PyRosetta and visualized through PyMOL. Our results from the initial scoring of the set of 64 PAM variants can be analyzed below.</p>
 +
<br><b> insert figure of graph of data visualization for 64 PAMs stat distribution</b>
 +
    <p>We then developed a script that allowed for more stringent mutations in the region of interest of the Cas9 protein that interacts with the PAM sequence in DNA. Depending on the amount of amino acid substitutions specified, our script induced in silico mutations resulting in a change of amino acid sequence in the Cas9 protein; we tested the interaction using a set of two PDB files per variant- a shortened Cas9 whose structure only included the area of interaction and the full Cas9 protein.</p>
 +
<br><b>insert image of clipped NGG vs. full sctrucured NGG</b>
 +
  <p>Accuracy of the interaction between the Cas9 was ensured by further specifying physical fields such as the angle or torsion, degrees of freedom with respect to movement of the ligands, and repacking which allowed for the optimal conformation of the newly mutated Cas9 so that conditions were ideal for binding.</p>
 
     <h3>Available PAM Affinity Data</h3>
 
     <h3>Available PAM Affinity Data</h3>
 
     <p>Mention Klienstiver and </p>
 
     <p>Mention Klienstiver and </p>

Revision as of 22:43, 18 September 2015

Modelling Engineered Cas9 PAM Flexibility

CRISPR-Cas9 is one of the most significant advances in genetic engineering in the last several years. However, one limitation of the S. pyogenes CRISPR-Cas9 (spCas9) is the NGG protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) required for binding to the target DNA site. While the 20bp protospacer can be easily specified with different sgRNAs, the PAM is essentially hardcoded into the Cas9 protein structure of the PAM-interacting (PI) domain. This limits the number of possible targets in a given genome, and thus the possible uses of spCas9 for genetic engineering. However, attempts to selectively modify Cas9 to bind new PAMs, specifically by changing two amino acids thought to bind directly to the PAM DNA sequence, failed.

However, Kleinstiver et al. recently demonstrated modified spCas9 with altered PAM specificity. Cells were transformed with a plasmid bearing a toxic gene and an NGA adjacent protospacer, as well as a spCas9 gene with a randomly mutagenized PAM Identification Domain. Only cells capable of binding the NGA PAM sequence were able to cut the plasmid, and thus survive. By sequencing surviving clones, the authors were able to identify mutations in the PI domain that altered PAM sequence specificity.

Two mutants in particular showed both high specificity and activity for the NGA PAM sequence. The first mutant, referred to as VQR (D1135V,R1335Q,T1337R), worked equivalently on all four NGAN PAM sequences. The second mutant, EQR (D1135E, R1335Q, T1337R) was most specific to NGAG PAMs. A second round of testing also found a VRER variant ((D1135V,G1218R,R1335E,T1337R) that was specific to NGCG PAMs.

Wild Type spCas residues
A PyMOL generated image of the wild type residues near the PAM binding site of spCas9.
EQR Mutated Residues
A PyMOL generated image of the three mutations found in the EQR spCas9 variant
VQR Mutated Residues
A PyMOL generated image of the three mutations found in the VQR spCas9 variant

These result indicate that spCas9 can display altered PAM specificity with relatively few mutants. Additionally, the data produced by Kleinstiver et al. also provided significant insight into the types of mutations that altered PAM specificity. This allows for a more targeted approach to engineering new spCas9 PAMs.

PAM Sites Differ between Natural Cas9 PRoteins

Computational Engineering of PAM Flexibility

Modelling Binding with PyMOL and PyRosetta

As of June 2015, at least three different groups have produce experimental data on Cas9 structure. By using a catalytically dead version of spCas9 (dCas9), Anders et al. managed to determine the crystal structure of a Cas9 protein bound to both the sgRNA and the double stranded target DNA. The PDB file containing this structure can be found in the Protein Data Bank with ID 4UN3.

Canonical molecular dynamics data, mention source of PDB

Our approach for further structural mutations in the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) region for Cas9 recognition was applied by generating a combination of 64 different PAM sequences using both 3DNA and Chimera (our choice of software will be elaborated below); these combinations were implemented by altering the original 4UN3 PDB file and were subsequently tested and scored using PyRosetta and visualized through PyMOL. Our results from the initial scoring of the set of 64 PAM variants can be analyzed below.


insert figure of graph of data visualization for 64 PAMs stat distribution

We then developed a script that allowed for more stringent mutations in the region of interest of the Cas9 protein that interacts with the PAM sequence in DNA. Depending on the amount of amino acid substitutions specified, our script induced in silico mutations resulting in a change of amino acid sequence in the Cas9 protein; we tested the interaction using a set of two PDB files per variant- a shortened Cas9 whose structure only included the area of interaction and the full Cas9 protein.


insert image of clipped NGG vs. full sctrucured NGG

Accuracy of the interaction between the Cas9 was ensured by further specifying physical fields such as the angle or torsion, degrees of freedom with respect to movement of the ligands, and repacking which allowed for the optimal conformation of the newly mutated Cas9 so that conditions were ideal for binding.

Available PAM Affinity Data

Mention Klienstiver and

Engineering Pipeline

The overall approach to identifying possible mutants for new PAM variants is:

  • Start with the pdb with crystal structure data for spCas9 bound to the target DNA
  • Modify the amino acid sequence of the PDB. Mutants will be generate based on the location and amino acid substitution data from Kleinstiver et al., as well as known biochemical properties of the amino acid being mutated.
  • Once a mutant has been generated, a full set of pdbs with the 64 or 256 different PAM variants will be created for each mutant.
  • The DNA sequence is docked to the PI domain using PyRosetta, with scores being tracked over multiple runs.
  • Scores are averaged and mutant specificity to different PAM sequences is determined, based on the clustering of the scores by PAM.
  • Mutants highly specific for a particular PAM will be tested in the lab.

Model Validation

Choice of DNA Mutation Software

Chimera VS 3DNA, give stats details

Patterns of Variation between Simulations

Simulations are Monte Carlo, we analyzed the differences between them

Wild-Type Cas9 PAM Affinities are Reproduced

Report Kendall's Tau, Pearson, Clustering Results

Mutant Cas9 PAM Affinities show Mixed Results

Mutating VQR/EQR, how EQR and VQR mutants change Cas9 visualizations, measures of distance from DNA bases to binding sites in the Cas9

Framework and Future Work

Proposed Tool

Link to software page re:pyrosetta

Future Work

Talk about adding other info like Gibb's Free Energy

Show a few graphs from Kleinstiver and link to dataset encouraging others to use

References

Top