Difference between revisions of "Team:Tokyo Tech/Collaborations"
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
<div class="textarea"> | <div class="textarea"> | ||
<h2 class="smalltitle">Meetup with the iGEM LZU-China Team</h2> | <h2 class="smalltitle">Meetup with the iGEM LZU-China Team</h2> | ||
− | <h4 class="text"><p>In this event, we each introduced our project along with the project from our previous year. | + | <h4 class="text"><p>On the l9th of July, we held a meetup with the iGEM LZU-China team at Tokyo Institute of Technology.In this event, we each introduced our project along with the project from our previous year. |
We exchanged ideas about each other’s project and gave each other feedbacks. | We exchanged ideas about each other’s project and gave each other feedbacks. | ||
The iGEM LZU-China team also participated in our “Prisoner’s Dilemma Experiment” that we conducted. This experiment is a sociological experiment concerning the safety of genetic modification and is part of our “Policy & Practices”. | The iGEM LZU-China team also participated in our “Prisoner’s Dilemma Experiment” that we conducted. This experiment is a sociological experiment concerning the safety of genetic modification and is part of our “Policy & Practices”. |
Revision as of 07:02, 13 September 2015
Collaboration
We shared ideas with many teams.
We helped Nagahama
We were helped by Nagahama
From their past experiences in 2014, iGEM Team Nahahama gave us these 2 advices about chemotaxis experiments.
1. In order to increase the chemotactic activity of E. coli, the best concentration of agar is 0.3 %.
2. It is better to directly stick the chip inside the agar and then inject the E .coli, than to place the E. coli on top of the agar.
Also, Team Nagahama gave us the raw data along with the protocol of the experiments for assaying the chemotactic activity of a wild type E.coli, following the protocol written above.
Fig. 7-4-3-1.Positive Chemotaxis of E.coli |
Fig. 7-4-3-2.Negative Chemotaxis of E.coli |
Our plan at first was to integrate the chemotaxis experiment into our overall project. Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain positive results from the gene that we constructed, before the Giant Jamboree. However, the advice we received from Team Nagahama helped us a lot. We would like to say thanks to all the help we received from them.
May Festival
The Japanese iGEM teams took part in the school festival at the University of Tokyo.
Our teams shared ideas and gave each other feedbacks. Together, we introduced synthetic biology to the public.
See the “Policy & Practices” page for further information.
Meetup with the iGEM LZU-China Team
On the l9th of July, we held a meetup with the iGEM LZU-China team at Tokyo Institute of Technology.In this event, we each introduced our project along with the project from our previous year. We exchanged ideas about each other’s project and gave each other feedbacks. The iGEM LZU-China team also participated in our “Prisoner’s Dilemma Experiment” that we conducted. This experiment is a sociological experiment concerning the safety of genetic modification and is part of our “Policy & Practices”. See the “Policy & Practices” page for further information.
Fig7-4-3-1 Meetup with the iGEM LZU-China Team |
Meetup at Boston University
On September 23th, our team is going to host a meetup in Boston University. We are looking forward to sharing ideas with other iGEM teams. Teams will have the opportunity to present their projects and exchange their ideas in details with other iGEM teams and faculty advisors right before the Giant Jamboree.
Meetup page:
https://2015.igem.org/Meetups/Tokyo_Tech_Sept