• Home
• Project
  • Introduction
  • Result and Discussion
  • Future
  • Protocol
• BioBricks
  • Our all BioBriks
  • BioBriks for medal
  • PartCollection
• Attributions
  • Team
  • Attributions
  • Sponsors
• Collabolations
  • Collaborations
  • Supported by Tokyo_Tech
  • Support Tokyo_Tech
  • UGA-Georgia
  • Uniandes_Colombia
  • Paris-Saclay
  • UT-Tokyo
  • Tokyo-NoKoGen
  • UI-Indonesia
  • NEFU_China
• Human Practice
  • Human Practice
  • Risk assessment
  • Innovative HP
  • Safety
  • Sustainability of iGEM Japan
• Prototype
  • Prototype

Result and Discussion

Proof of Concept (POC)

We examined the antibacterial activity of volatile substance to realize Kozoko. The result suggested that volatile substance of the wasabi, rose, garlic and onion have antibacterial properties. We attempted to identify antibacterial volatile by literature search. Wasabi, rose, garlic and onion have Allyl isothiocyanete, geraniol, allicin, lachrymaltory-factor respectively. Synthesis of antibacterial volatile has many complicated things, so the synthesis requires various enzymes and precursor. Further, We researched whether synthesis of antibacterial volatile will succeed or not in E. coli. The result, E. coli synthesize precursor of geraniol (geranyl diphosphate,GPP). We understood that E. coli can synthesize geraniol using one enzyme. So, we designed system that biosynthesizes geraniol in E. coli.
We will transfer
1. geraniol synthase gene (from Ocimium basilicum).
2. isoprenoid pathway such as MEP pathway gene (dxs, ipsD, ispF, idi, ispA) to biosynthesize GPP that is precursor of geraniol.
3. positive transcription factor of AcrAB-TolC efflux pump gene (MarA) to enhance geraniol tolerance and export geraniol out of cells.

We examined our working hypothesis to “Flavorator” that the volatile gaseous substances from plants’ origin can show either the antibacterial or bacteriostatic activity in a box like Kozoko.

Fragrance of Garlic

○Protocl here

Garlic grated produced its fragrances to suppress unwanted microbial growth. Left pork(A) didn't change the color. Right pork(B) changed Pink to Brown. We found from this result that fragrance of plants have antibacteril volatiles.

Left pork (A) was spread the garlic grated. Right pork (B) wasn’t spread the garlic grated. We left the two pork in the box at 18℃ for 2 month. Left pork (A) didn’t change the color. Right pork (B) changed Pink to Brown.

Fragrance of wasabi

Protocl here

Wasabi grated produced its fragrances to suppress unwanted microbial growth. We found from this result that fragrance of plants have antibacteril volatiles.

図の説明

Fragrance of Rose

Protocl here

Rose grated produced its fragrances to suppress unwanted microbial growth. We found from this result that fragrance of plants have antibacteril volatiles.

fig1：説明

図の説明

図の説明

先駆体合成 (キノン)

GOH生産

FOH生産

ispA+MEP.dev[http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1653025]

λPL+r.b.s.+ispA＋MEP+×× (r.b.s.+dxs+r.b.s.+m-idi+r.b.s.+ispDF)

E. coli strain engineered with MEP pathway enzymes, ispDF, idi, and dxs , in combination with the enzyme gens, ispA, produced farnesol (Fig. 4B), which was detected by the Gas chromatography/Mas (Fig. 4A-G), having the same retention time as the farnesol chemica sample (Fig. 4A), while the counterpart control E. coli did not produce farnesol under the same conditions (Fig. 4C).　Neither E. coli engineered with MEP pathway enzymes only nor the one engineered ispA only showed any farnesol by the Gas chromatography/Mass (Figs. 4D and E). Farnesol is generated through hydrolysis of farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) by the endogenous phosphatases. Increase in farnesol should be associated with an increased intracellular FPP level. FPP is, in turn, converted from geranyl diphosphate (GPP), whose precursors are IPP and DMAPP. IPP and DMPP are end products of MEP pathway that exists in E. coli. Conversion to FPP from IPP or DMPP requires ispA (or m-ispA). Following this context, we speculate that E. coli could produce farnesol better than the counterpart control cells under the up-regulated cellular conditions of an increased intracellular MEP pathway enzymes by metabolic engineering in combination with the special enzyme that converts IPP or DMAPP into FPP.

Gas Chromatography/Mass(GC/MS)

Fig4:The FOH standard solution (Ref) was used as a control. The peak corresponding to the FOH standard at 8.5 min is indicated by an arrow. The peak at 8.5 min was applied to GC/MS. The FOH standard solution (Ref) was used as a control. E. coli JM109(Bba_K165025) were compared with respect to FOH formation using GC-MS. The fagment patarn is Similar with Ref.

ispA+MEP.dev[http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1653025]

λPL+r.b.s.+ispA＋MEP+×× (r.b.s.+dxs+r.b.s.+m-idi+r.b.s.+ispDF)

FOH is probably generated through FPP hydrolysis by endogenous phosphatases, which are induced by an increased intracellular FPP level Analogously, we hypothesized that E. coli could produce FOH under cellular conditions of an increased intracellular FPP level through metabolic engineering. A MEP pathway has been shown to synthesize IPP and DMAPP efficiently in E. coli. Because of its high hydrophobicity and low volatility, decane was chosen to extract and solubilize FOH from culture broth. The decane overlay in the two-phase culture did not affect growth, and FOH could be solubilized in the decane phase with negligible volatile loss. We adopt 1 mL of decane overlaid to 5 mL of culture broth. Two-phase culture of E. coli JM109 (BBa_K165025) was carried out in 2YT medium containing 1% glycerol at 29°C for 48 h. The decane phase of the two-phase culture was collected to analyze the FOH content by GC-MS. In the GC-MS analysis (Fig. 4A-G), there was a main peak at 8.5 min in the collected decane phase sample, which corresponded to the reference solution of the standard FOH compound dissolved in decane. Mass spectrometry confirmed that the peak at 8.5 min was FOH (Fig. 4-A). However, the peak was not observed in two-phase culture without introducing BBa_K165025. The formation of FOH from FPP was further confirmed by blocking FPP synthesis. In the GC-MS, the FOH peak was observed in E. coli JM109 (BBa_K165025) culture, whereas no peak was observed with transformed E. coli JM109. It was found that FOH need not only ispA(BBa_K165018) but also MEP(BBa_K165024) in E. coli.We submit new part(BBa_K165025) as producing FOH.

Gas Chromatography/Mass(GC/MS)

Fig4:The FOH standard solution (Ref) was used as a control. The peak corresponding to the FOH standard at 8.5 min is indicated by an arrow. The peak at 8.5 min was applied to GC/MS. The FOH standard solution (Ref) was used as a control. E. coli JM109(Bba_K165025) were compared with respect to FOH formation using GC-MS.

Export and Resistance

Export

[http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1653020 Part's Page]

Fig. XXX: Intracellular geraniol concentrations of E. coli JM109 (WT) and its overexpressing of marA strain, E. coli JM109 (marA).
In this figure, intracellular content of geraniol was less in the strain E. coli JM109 (marA) than the strain E. coli JM109 (WT). The concentrations of intracellular geraniol from E. coli JM109 (marA) was 42.9 μg/ml, which was 40% lower than that from of E. coli JM109 (WT), 72.2 μg/ml. This figure is suggesting that internalized geraniol could be more efficiently exported through AcrAB-TolC efflux pump following the presumed activation of this gene by introducing the activator marA gene.

Resistance

[http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1653020 Part's Page]

Fig. X: Colony formation efficiencies of E. coli JM109 engineered with marA on geraniol overlaid plates. E. coli JM109 and E. coli JM109 (marA) were spotted on LBGMg agar plates in serial ten-fold dilutions (10⁻¹～10⁻⁵), overlaid with geraniol solutions, and incubated at 30°C for 24 h. This figure shows that E. coli JM109 (marA) cells that overexpress the marA product is more survived on geraniol overlay plates than the counterpart control E. coli JM109 wild type cells.

Fig. XX: Comparison of colony numbers after addition of geraniol solution. Time interval for treatment was set every 1 hour from 1 hour to 4 hours. A: E. coli JM109 (WT) + hexane; B: E. coli JM109 (marA) + hexane; C: E. coli JM109 (WT) + geraniol; D: E. coli JM109 (marA) + geraniol. As shown in Figs. XX A and B, treatment with hexane of E. coli JM109 (WT) and of E. coli JM109 (marA) showed similar colony numbers during these treatment intervals to those of time zero. This result suggests that hexane at this concentration and duration of time for 4hours did not affect both cell growth. In contrast, treatment with geraniol of E. coli JM109 (WT) and of E. coli JM109 (marA) showed toxicities to both strains (Figs. XX B, C and D). If we watch the colony numbers carefully, E. coli JM109 (marA) had more than E. coli JM109 (WT) during these treatment intervals ((Figs. XX C and D). These results demonstrate that toxicity of the geraniol was less to the strain E. coli JM109 (marA) than the strain E. coli JM109 (WT).