Difference between revisions of "Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Design"
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
In the picture below we took a picture with these filter from purified GFP, sfGFP lysate and lysate without sfGFP. You can see different colors and a different brightnesses in the picture. So in our first impression we thought it's worth to try some other filters, to find the perfect Filter for sfGFP imaging with almost no background signal. </p> | In the picture below we took a picture with these filter from purified GFP, sfGFP lysate and lysate without sfGFP. You can see different colors and a different brightnesses in the picture. So in our first impression we thought it's worth to try some other filters, to find the perfect Filter for sfGFP imaging with almost no background signal. </p> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
<figure style="margin:auto; width: 300px"> | <figure style="margin:auto; width: 300px"> | ||
| Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
<p> Therefore we bought a lee color filter catalog and began to test different filter combinations. But before testing we decided to measure the extinction and emission spectra from sfGFP as a basis to choose the most promising filter combination and to have a look if the smartphone flash really extincts sfGFP. The preselection was possible, because we had access to the light transmitting spectra of almost every filter. </p> | <p> Therefore we bought a lee color filter catalog and began to test different filter combinations. But before testing we decided to measure the extinction and emission spectra from sfGFP as a basis to choose the most promising filter combination and to have a look if the smartphone flash really extincts sfGFP. The preselection was possible, because we had access to the light transmitting spectra of almost every filter. </p> | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
<figure style="margin:auto; width: 500px"> | <figure style="margin:auto; width: 500px"> | ||
| Line 44: | Line 45: | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
<figure style="margin:auto; width: 200px"> | <figure style="margin:auto; width: 200px"> | ||
| Line 53: | Line 54: | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
<p> The next step was to create a dark environment. Therefore we did handicrafts to design a "black box". Now it was possible to take photos under defined conditions and constant dark background. </p> | <p> The next step was to create a dark environment. Therefore we did handicrafts to design a "black box". Now it was possible to take photos under defined conditions and constant dark background. </p> | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
<figure style="margin:auto; width: 300px"> | <figure style="margin:auto; width: 300px"> | ||
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/11/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_black_box.png" data-lightbox="detection" data-title=" The black box: tinkered to take photos under same conditions"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/11/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_black_box.png" ></a> | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/11/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_black_box.png" data-lightbox="detection" data-title=" The black box: tinkered to take photos under same conditions"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/1/11/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_black_box.png" ></a> | ||
| Line 61: | Line 62: | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure | </figure | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
<h2> The filter combinations </h2> | <h2> The filter combinations </h2> | ||
<p> The essential requirements for taking comparable photos are done. Now we had to find the ideal filter combination. So we made a lot of photos with the preselection. We tested 6 filters for emission and combined every filter for emission with up to 16 filters for extinction.After analyzing the photos with the image processing software Fiji, the optimal filter combination found was tokyo blue (071) in front of the flash and twickenham green (736) in front of the camera. </p> | <p> The essential requirements for taking comparable photos are done. Now we had to find the ideal filter combination. So we made a lot of photos with the preselection. We tested 6 filters for emission and combined every filter for emission with up to 16 filters for extinction.After analyzing the photos with the image processing software Fiji, the optimal filter combination found was tokyo blue (071) in front of the flash and twickenham green (736) in front of the camera. </p> | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
<figure style="margin:auto; width: 400px"> | <figure style="margin:auto; width: 400px"> | ||
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/57/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_optimal_filtercombination.png " data-lightbox="detection" data-title="Test of different filtercombinations. On the top there is the picture without any filters. In the middle the picture was taken with fluorescence green in front of the camera and deep blue in front of the flash. The bottom photo was taken with the optimal filtercombinition. Tokyo blue in front of the flash and twickenham green in front of the camera"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/57/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_optimal_filtercombination.png" ></a> | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/57/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_optimal_filtercombination.png " data-lightbox="detection" data-title="Test of different filtercombinations. On the top there is the picture without any filters. In the middle the picture was taken with fluorescence green in front of the camera and deep blue in front of the flash. The bottom photo was taken with the optimal filtercombinition. Tokyo blue in front of the flash and twickenham green in front of the camera"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/5/57/Bielefeld-CeBiTec_optimal_filtercombination.png" ></a> | ||
| Line 72: | Line 73: | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| + | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
<p> As you can see in the picture above it is really important to choose the right filters to get a high fluorescence signal and a low background signal. But is it only possible to photograph sfGFP and GFP? To find it out, we tried to photograph monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) lysate, as well. </p> | <p> As you can see in the picture above it is really important to choose the right filters to get a high fluorescence signal and a low background signal. But is it only possible to photograph sfGFP and GFP? To find it out, we tried to photograph monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) lysate, as well. </p> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
<figure style="margin:auto; width: 400px"> | <figure style="margin:auto; width: 400px"> | ||
| Line 80: | Line 84: | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
<h2> Does fluorescence photography work on Paper? </h2> | <h2> Does fluorescence photography work on Paper? </h2> | ||
| − | <p> So far so good. Fluorescence imaging of liquids in quite high amounts is possible. But does it also works with small volumes and on paper? Therefore we took normal laboratory filter papers. (MN 827 B from Macherey and Nagel, C 350 L and FN3 from Munktell and a laboratory filter paper we got from Merck) and put the lysates on the paper and took the photos. Exemplary the results from laboratory filter paper from Merck. The other ones showed the same results. As you can see in the picture below this paragraph, it is possible to photograph volumes of 5 µl purified GFP up to a concentration of 17,5 mmol/l. | + | <p> So far so good. Fluorescence imaging of liquids in quite high amounts is possible. But does it also works with small volumes and on paper? Therefore we took normal laboratory filter papers. (MN 827 B from Macherey and Nagel, C 350 L and FN3 from Munktell and a laboratory filter paper we got from Merck) and put the lysates on the paper and took the photos. Exemplary the results from laboratory filter paper from Merck. The other ones showed the same results. As you can see in the picture below this paragraph, it is possible to photograph volumes of 5 µl purified GFP up to a concentration of 17,5 mmol/l. </p> |
| + | <br> | ||
<figure style="margin:auto; width: 600px"> | <figure style="margin:auto; width: 600px"> | ||
| Line 92: | Line 98: | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
<p> Now we wanted to find out if it is possible to photograph the fluorescence from a CFPS experiment on paper. So after a CFPS run on paper, we took the scrap of paper and took a photo from it. As you can see in the picture below. </p> | <p> Now we wanted to find out if it is possible to photograph the fluorescence from a CFPS experiment on paper. So after a CFPS run on paper, we took the scrap of paper and took a photo from it. As you can see in the picture below. </p> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
<figure style="margin:auto; width: 600px"> | <figure style="margin:auto; width: 600px"> | ||
| Line 100: | Line 110: | ||
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
<h2> The 3D print </h2> | <h2> The 3D print </h2> | ||
| Line 110: | Line 122: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
Revision as of 20:48, 14 September 2015
Prototype Design
The first steps
We planed to design a practical test stripe using fluorescence as output signal. But fluorescence outside the lab sounds not really simple to use. So we had to find a easy way to analyze the output. Therefore we wanted to test in the beginning of our project, if it could work to photograph fluorescence with a smartphone. We got a filter from light engineering from the women cultural center Bielefeld e.V. ("Frauenkulturzentrum Bielefeld e.V.") and put it in front of the smartphone. In the picture below we took a picture with these filter from purified GFP, sfGFP lysate and lysate without sfGFP. You can see different colors and a different brightnesses in the picture. So in our first impression we thought it's worth to try some other filters, to find the perfect Filter for sfGFP imaging with almost no background signal.
Therefore we bought a lee color filter catalog and began to test different filter combinations. But before testing we decided to measure the extinction and emission spectra from sfGFP as a basis to choose the most promising filter combination and to have a look if the smartphone flash really extincts sfGFP. The preselection was possible, because we had access to the light transmitting spectra of almost every filter.
The next step was to create a dark environment. Therefore we did handicrafts to design a "black box". Now it was possible to take photos under defined conditions and constant dark background.
The filter combinations
The essential requirements for taking comparable photos are done. Now we had to find the ideal filter combination. So we made a lot of photos with the preselection. We tested 6 filters for emission and combined every filter for emission with up to 16 filters for extinction.After analyzing the photos with the image processing software Fiji, the optimal filter combination found was tokyo blue (071) in front of the flash and twickenham green (736) in front of the camera.
As you can see in the picture above it is really important to choose the right filters to get a high fluorescence signal and a low background signal. But is it only possible to photograph sfGFP and GFP? To find it out, we tried to photograph monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) lysate, as well.
Does fluorescence photography work on Paper?
So far so good. Fluorescence imaging of liquids in quite high amounts is possible. But does it also works with small volumes and on paper? Therefore we took normal laboratory filter papers. (MN 827 B from Macherey and Nagel, C 350 L and FN3 from Munktell and a laboratory filter paper we got from Merck) and put the lysates on the paper and took the photos. Exemplary the results from laboratory filter paper from Merck. The other ones showed the same results. As you can see in the picture below this paragraph, it is possible to photograph volumes of 5 µl purified GFP up to a concentration of 17,5 mmol/l.
Now we wanted to find out if it is possible to photograph the fluorescence from a CFPS experiment on paper. So after a CFPS run on paper, we took the scrap of paper and took a photo from it. As you can see in the picture below.
The 3D print
Ok, the fluorescence detections works fine, but it's not really practical to take the photo. The filter have to be in the right position direct in front of the camera respectively the flash. Also it has to be quite dark for high quality pictures. Therefore we designed a box and realized it with a 3D printer. The top can be changed specific for the smartphone you use. The test stripe can be placed on the push loading drawer and inserted into the box. So it's quite easy to use. You just have to put the smartphone on the top, insert the test strip an take the photo.
